C6 full exhaust numbers
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 6
From: East Coast
C6 full exhaust numbers Kooks long tube headers, with high flow cats(internals now gutted,so, no cats) and B&B bullet exhaust and ofcourse a tune
399.4 rwhp and 386 rwtq
stock numbers were 370 rwhp and 362 rwtq
Car sounds AMAZING. By far, one of the best sounding automobiles I have EVER heard.
399.4 rwhp and 386 rwtq
stock numbers were 370 rwhp and 362 rwtq
Car sounds AMAZING. By far, one of the best sounding automobiles I have EVER heard.
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: South FL
Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
Kooks long tube headers, with high flow cats(internals now gutted,so, no cats) and B&B bullet exhaust and ofcourse a tune
399.4 rwhp and 386 rwtq
stock numbers were 370 rwhp and 362 rwtq
Car sounds AMAZING. By far, one of the best sounding automobiles I have EVER heard.
399.4 rwhp and 386 rwtq
stock numbers were 370 rwhp and 362 rwtq
Car sounds AMAZING. By far, one of the best sounding automobiles I have EVER heard.
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: South FL
Originally Posted by 66deuce
maybe not.the title says C6.i was thinking the LS2 is a little stronger than the old LS6?or am i on drugs?
i would highly suggest checking that dyno
Originally Posted by Silvervette73
old LS6 was 405 hp, the new LS2 is 400. also, the Z06 is running faster and trapping a higher mph at the end of the 1/4, adn the fact that the stock C5's i have seen dyno are not coming close to 370rwhp, most seem to be in the 325-355 range depending on the tranny
i would highly suggest checking that dyno
i would highly suggest checking that dyno
With a tune, most ls2's are putting down 360-370rwhp. You need to do more research before opening your mouth and making yourself look like an idiot. LS2's are in severe need of a tune because of gm de-tuning the **** out of them from the factory.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo Staging Lane
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: South FL
Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
I would suggest checking your brain
With a tune, most ls2's are putting down 360-370rwhp. You need to do more research before opening your mouth and making yourself look like an idiot. LS2's are in severe need of a tune because of gm de-tuning the **** out of them from the factory.
With a tune, most ls2's are putting down 360-370rwhp. You need to do more research before opening your mouth and making yourself look like an idiot. LS2's are in severe need of a tune because of gm de-tuning the **** out of them from the factory.
here is some help
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...0&forum_id=101
this guy said his car dynoed "stock" 370rwhp. Now, who looks like an idiot
Last edited by Silvervette73; Sep 21, 2005 at 06:21 AM.
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 6
From: East Coast
Actually boys,...this is a "low" numbers dyno, as ANYONE who has ever dyoned there can attest to. It is a Superflow dyno,....and trust me, it is calibrated.
Also, it is a load bareing dyno, therefore it simulates weight, wind speed...etc etc.
The dyno IS correct.
As far as GM tuneing goes, belive it or not, they really are very well tuned out of the box,...makeing it hard for tuners to gain more power.
This car, bone stock, went 12.8 @ 110 mph. Stock.
With a tune,...that didn't make alot more power on the dyno,...the car went 12.5 @ 114 mph.
Most likely due to the lack of torque management on the "tuned" setup.
We do not have numbers at the track for the full exhaust and re-tune yet.
No flame but,...the car is laying down power, regardless of what you THINK.
First chance we can get, we'll go to a dynojet dyno, and show you some HIGHER numbers then what we are already makeing.
Also, it is a load bareing dyno, therefore it simulates weight, wind speed...etc etc.
The dyno IS correct.
As far as GM tuneing goes, belive it or not, they really are very well tuned out of the box,...makeing it hard for tuners to gain more power.
This car, bone stock, went 12.8 @ 110 mph. Stock.
With a tune,...that didn't make alot more power on the dyno,...the car went 12.5 @ 114 mph.
Most likely due to the lack of torque management on the "tuned" setup.
We do not have numbers at the track for the full exhaust and re-tune yet.
No flame but,...the car is laying down power, regardless of what you THINK.
First chance we can get, we'll go to a dynojet dyno, and show you some HIGHER numbers then what we are already makeing.
Launching!
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
What were the 1/8 mile and 60' times for the 12.5 at 114 run? The only thing I do not agree with is the 370 stock number. That is better than most if not all stock Z06 numbers that I have seen. The car is not puting down Z06 times or mph at the track.
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 6
From: East Coast
Originally Posted by Zippinzee
What were the 1/8 mile and 60' times for the 12.5 at 114 run? The only thing I do not agree with is the 370 stock number. That is better than most if not all stock Z06 numbers that I have seen. The car is not puting down Z06 times or mph at the track.
ok. 2.09 60ft time. the 1/8th should be about 8.2 at about 88.9 mph.
I will get exact numbers at the end of the day. I have no problem getting the timeslips,..and posting them.
If you don't belive anything else, let me know. we are at the track every week.
It is what it is....and being on the internet, I expect people to speculate.
If anyone wants to prove us wrong, pay for the dyno pulls and, we'll be happy to show you.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Zippinzee
What were the 1/8 mile and 60' times for the 12.5 at 114 run? The only thing I do not agree with is the 370 stock number. That is better than most if not all stock Z06 numbers that I have seen. The car is not puting down Z06 times or mph at the track.
Last edited by SideStep; Sep 21, 2005 at 08:28 AM.
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: South FL
Originally Posted by Zippinzee
What were the 1/8 mile and 60' times for the 12.5 at 114 run? The only thing I do not agree with is the 370 stock number. That is better than most if not all stock Z06 numbers that I have seen. The car is not puting down Z06 times or mph at the track.
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: South FL
Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
Actually boys,...this is a "low" numbers dyno, as ANYONE who has ever dyoned there can attest to. It is a Superflow dyno,....and trust me, it is calibrated.
Lets put it this way, if a stock C6 dynoed 370 on it, and on all the other dynos in the country, they are 325-355, then i think that is proof enough.
looks like their dyno is high 25-30 hp, i knew a guy that had a dyno like that, i believe it was called Unlimited performance here in south FL
i know for a fact his dyno was wayyyyyyyy off too ( personal experience). I bet his dyno was giving higher numbers too, at least 10% or more, guess that was done to make some people feel better when their cars was not making the hp it should be 
my vette, with 325rwhp, 3.42 gears( its an auto ) was trapping 110mph at the same track you ran your C6 on, and that was in 89 deg heat 90% humidity on a summer night.
your C6 with 370rwhp, at least 100lbs lighter, trapped 110mph? there you go, another piece of evidence
no flames intended, just stating facts
Last edited by Silvervette73; Sep 21, 2005 at 08:34 AM.
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 6
From: East Coast
Originally Posted by Silvervette73
Not from what i have seen/heard
Lets put it this way, if a stock C6 dynoed 370 on it, and on all the other dynos in the country, they are 325-355, then i think that is proof enough.
looks like their dyno is high 25-30 hp, i knew a guy that had a dyno like that, i believe it was called Unlimited performance here in south FL i know for a fact his dyno was wayyyyyyyy off too ( personal experience)
my vette, with 325rwhp, 3.42 gears( its an auto ) was trapping 110mph at the same track you an your C6 on, and that was in 89 deg heat 90% humidity on a summer night.
your C6 with 370rwhp, at least 100lbs lighter, trapped 110mph? there you go, another piece of evidence
no flames intended, just stating facts
Lets put it this way, if a stock C6 dynoed 370 on it, and on all the other dynos in the country, they are 325-355, then i think that is proof enough.
looks like their dyno is high 25-30 hp, i knew a guy that had a dyno like that, i believe it was called Unlimited performance here in south FL
i know for a fact his dyno was wayyyyyyyy off too ( personal experience)my vette, with 325rwhp, 3.42 gears( its an auto ) was trapping 110mph at the same track you an your C6 on, and that was in 89 deg heat 90% humidity on a summer night.
your C6 with 370rwhp, at least 100lbs lighter, trapped 110mph? there you go, another piece of evidence
no flames intended, just stating facts
ok. How would you explain 110 to 114 mph from a tune only? Not to mention a tune that didn't show much power on the dyno?
I would have to say, it was due to not having torque management on the car.
no flames recieved....again,...the numbers are correct. Again, anyone willing to put the dollars up to prove otherwise,...do it. We are more then happy to take a ride to any dyno in the area,..just to show you whats up.
...anytime.
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: South FL
Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
ok. How would you explain 110 to 114 mph from a tune only? Not to mention a tune that didn't show much power on the dyno?
I would have to say, it was due to not having torque management on the car.
no flames recieved....again,...the numbers are correct. Again, anyone willing to put the dollars up to prove otherwise,...do it. We are more then happy to take a ride to any dyno in the area,..just to show you whats up.
...anytime.
I would have to say, it was due to not having torque management on the car.
no flames recieved....again,...the numbers are correct. Again, anyone willing to put the dollars up to prove otherwise,...do it. We are more then happy to take a ride to any dyno in the area,..just to show you whats up.
...anytime.
TECH Regular
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: STL
While I agree with dyno numbers are bit on high side, what really matters is what that car does on the track.
FWIW, my bone stock 2003 Z06 dyno'ed 351 rwhp and ran 12.4@114.5, (2.105 60' time), the temp was 92 degrees with 85% humidity.
FWIW, my bone stock 2003 Z06 dyno'ed 351 rwhp and ran 12.4@114.5, (2.105 60' time), the temp was 92 degrees with 85% humidity.
Launching!
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
My tuned 340 rwhp C6 did a 8.252 at 87.05 mph with a 1.952 60' on the run flats. Mph was down a little on that run as the rear end housing broke on the 1st to second shift. This run was in 93 degree weather and 40% humidity. The dyno that my car was tuned on is said to be conservitive, the operator said I would probably go 5 hp higher on some of the other local dynos.