Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

ARE 427 493 rwhp 466 rwtq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2005, 08:10 AM
  #1  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
10.5 Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grove City Ohio/Port Washington L.I sometimes
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ARE 427 493 rwhp 466 rwtq *Update 11-10-05 *

We finally got a chance to dyno my ARE 427 on Wed night and needless to say the numbers are weak.I know it's an ARE engine but I was hoping to see at least 520-530 rwhp.Mods are..........

ARE LS2 427
ARE/Patriot stage 3 heads
Crane 1.8 rockers
248/254 .621 intake .617 exhaust 114 +4 LSA (supposedly)
Fast 90 with LS2 TB
Halltech
Delphi 42 lb injectors
LGM 1 3/4 headers without cats
Stock Z06 exhaust
Spec 3 with alum flywheel
ECSC 4.10 gear
Fresh D&D MN12 tranny

The dyno graph shows the engine peaking at 6100 rpm and it nosedives.It only makes 320 rwhp at 6600.

I think the problem is the Patriot heads not being able to feed the engine up top.

What do you guys think?Oh BTW the car was tuned by Bill Wright aka Billium SS on here.

Last edited by 10.5 Dave; 11-10-2005 at 06:01 AM.
Old 10-01-2005, 09:13 AM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Can you post up a graph?
Old 10-01-2005, 09:20 AM
  #3  
JS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delray Beach, Fl.
Posts: 7,303
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I dont think thats too bad,okay it peaks low but u can shift it at 6300
It will run forever at that rpm and 490RW is nothing to sneeze at Roofer...

I'd try a set of Carteks mid lengths in a 1 7/8 first before pulling the heads
U might see 15RW.....
Old 10-01-2005, 09:30 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
evil02z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You might be losing some of it the the factory exhaust. I know the Z06 exhaust flows well but you're trying to push an extra 80ci of engine through it.
Old 10-01-2005, 09:37 AM
  #5  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

You are experiencing severe valve float past 6000 RPM's with a .600+ cam and 1.8 rockers.....too much valvetrain "intensity" with that much lift and the higher rocker ratio. You need to re-think your valvesprings, rocker arm choice, or both to establish better high RPM valvetrain stability. That might or might not help the bottom of the curve but it will most certainly help the top...also, AFR 225's anyone?.....LOL

Good luck resolving your issues.

Tony M.
Old 10-01-2005, 10:37 AM
  #6  
JS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delray Beach, Fl.
Posts: 7,303
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Tony has a point,switch back to 1.7's and see what happens

Maybe it'll actually pick up
Old 10-01-2005, 10:53 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Silvr98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
You are experiencing severe valve float past 6000 RPM's with a .600+ cam and 1.8 rockers.....too much valvetrain "intensity" with that much lift and the higher rocker ratio. You need to re-think your valvesprings, rocker arm choice, or both to establish better high RPM valvetrain stability. That might or might not help the bottom of the curve but it will most certainly help the top...also, AFR 225's anyone?.....LOL

Good luck resolving your issues.

Tony M.
Good call.....happened to me last year at Thunder with jesel 1.8's and a big cam. Floated bad up top.
Old 10-01-2005, 11:13 AM
  #8  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, a ~620 cam WITH 1.8's...or is that factoring in the 1.8's?
Old 10-01-2005, 11:27 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Wicked_Hugger99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: enterprise, AL
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What do those PP heads flow??? Did ya happen to get any TNT #'s or no???? Does the vette IRS eat up more power than a solid axle? just curious
Old 10-02-2005, 04:03 AM
  #10  
9 Second Club
 
Nickn20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ARE has patriot do thier heads now?
Old 10-02-2005, 09:02 AM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
52172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Buellton Ca
Posts: 3,489
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nickn20
ARE has patriot do thier heads now?
they are probibly patriot heads reworked by are
Old 10-02-2005, 01:13 PM
  #12  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
You are experiencing severe valve float past 6000 RPM's with a .600+ cam and 1.8 rockers.....too much valvetrain "intensity" with that much lift and the higher rocker ratio. You need to re-think your valvesprings, rocker arm choice, or both to establish better high RPM valvetrain stability. That might or might not help the bottom of the curve but it will most certainly help the top...also, AFR 225's anyone?.....LOL

Good luck resolving your issues.

Tony M.
thats the first thing i noticed.
Old 10-02-2005, 01:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You probably have severe valvefloat and those cylinder heads probably leave a lot to be desired.
Old 10-02-2005, 10:30 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
 
Mike K.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Did you guys notice this as well

Delphi 42 lb injectors
LGM 1 3/4 headers without cats
Stock Z06 exhaust


None of those are good except maybe the injectors for a 427, He definatly needs to let the exhaust breath alot better.
Old 10-02-2005, 11:06 PM
  #15  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike K.
Did you guys notice this as well

Delphi 42 lb injectors
LGM 1 3/4 headers without cats
Stock Z06 exhaust


None of those are good except maybe the injectors for a 427, He definatly needs to let the exhaust breath alot better.
IMO, the exhaust system isn't holding him back much.....Lou (LG) just put up big #'s with the same system on a stock C6 Z06 with just the addition of his 1.75 LGM headers. The biggest problem is the TQ output which should have been alot higher, especially with arguably the best header for torque production in a C5 (the LGM's with thier long primary/merge collector design). Also, the valve float issue (potential issue) probably wouldn't have much of an impact at the point the engine generates peak TQ, so even with the top of the curve cleaned up a little, the question still remains whether this combo will ultimately be a good set-up or not.

Any headway on changing some of the valve gear or springs?

Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; 10-02-2005 at 11:11 PM.
Old 10-03-2005, 02:50 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hopefully you still have the stock rockers sitting around somewhere.
Old 10-03-2005, 05:55 AM
  #17  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
10.5 Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grove City Ohio/Port Washington L.I sometimes
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.621 lift is with the 1.8's factored in.Stock Z06 mufflers flow quite well and are very light.I would have bought Kooks 1 7/8 headers but I already have the big dollar LGM headers and I don't want to buy new ones.

I'm going to buy a good set of heads and a cam directly from Comp this winter so I know that I'm getting.
Old 10-03-2005, 08:06 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
92SilverSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bensalem, Pa, now montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

my buddy made 501rwhp with his 402 ls2. Thats with AFR 225s
Old 10-03-2005, 09:50 AM
  #19  
JS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delray Beach, Fl.
Posts: 7,303
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I wouldnt pull the heads
Just switch to a mid length 1 7/8 header and it'll pick up power...
Old 10-03-2005, 10:07 AM
  #20  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JS
I wouldnt pull the heads
Just switch to a mid length 1 7/8 header and it'll pick up power...
Doubtful. LG made 565rwhp with a 427 with their headers. I've seen MTI guys do the LSX90 and Kooks 1-7/8" and pick up 30rwhp on those 427s. But that was from TPIS or FLP headers, and most of that was probably the LSX90.

It's probably worth 5HP maybe 10HP, but the area under the curve would be hurt. 32" primaries with a high flow merge collector are better suited than 24" primaries on a 1-7/8" with standard collectors. How?

For a 427 that peaks at 6400 or so, 34" primaries at 2" would be ideal. But, no one makes anything like this. Using the formulas from A. Graham Bell’s Performance Tuning in Theory and Practice, we can calculate that if you have a 32" primary, you would now need a 2.1" diameter, so 2.10"-1.75" = .35" difference. If the header has 24" primaries, it comes out to requiring a 2.72" diameter, and thus 2.720"-1.875" = .845".

Personally, I'd use the one that is closer to 0, which is the LG header. If LG would come out with a 1-7/8" that is 32", it would be the best hands down.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.