Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Bo White #241's, FAST 90, F15 cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2005, 09:27 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Bo White #241's, FAST 90, F15 cam

I sold the 12 bolt out from under the car a while back and stuck the stock 10 bolt back up under it.. then parked it in the garage for a couple of months while I was building the 408. Before I parked it, I had stuck a set of Bo White's #241's with 2.02 Rev intake and stock truck exhaust valves on the car. The rest of the combo is a stock bottom end (31k miles) with flycut pistons, FMS F15 cam, all bolt ons, and a FAST 90 setup (intake ported by Bo). I got the car out of the garage about two weeks ago and had a set of true duals installed on it. I was really impressed with the SOTP gain over the hooker catback, so since www.Bhamfbody.com was having a dyno day today.. what better time to blow the dust off the car and dyno it. I was really surprised with the power it made, but more amazed with the torque. With the belt on it made 439rwhp 410rwtq, with the belt off it made 446rwhp 417rwtq. Btw, I have an electric WP on the car. I really thought those were good numbers with the mild, unmilled heads on the car. All this dyno racing today made me think back to a year or so ago when I changed combo's every week.. damn that was fun. STAY TUNED I have the "bug" again.
I'm waiting for Blake at www.walkerdynotune.com to email me the run files and then I'll post the graphs.


Last edited by gomer; 12-02-2005 at 10:06 PM.
Old 11-26-2005, 09:50 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

I heard a Vette at the local track that had Borla Stingers with a f15 cam, Man what a sound to hear.
Old 11-26-2005, 09:55 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
CRL 01 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hoover, Alabama
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice numbers Scott! I met up with Bo today at the dyno and gave him my FAST 90 to port a little bit. Should only be a few weeks and I'll be ready to get some new numbers on my car. I'll let you know.
Old 11-26-2005, 09:55 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes,those are good numbers.it proves that there's more to a good set of heads than flow numbers.the heads i have on now (mildly ported 5.3s)blow away my old patriots,even though the patriots had more peak flow than my 5.3s.
Old 11-26-2005, 09:56 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CRL 01 SS
Nice numbers Scott! I met up with Bo today at the dyno and gave him my FAST 90 to port a little bit. Should only be a few weeks and I'll be ready to get some new numbers on my car. I'll let you know.
Cool man, just let me know. You know how much I like beating on other people's stuff on the rollers
Old 11-26-2005, 10:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sorry I got there so late(porting all day ), glad to see that your car is back on the rollers . I know it gave ya the bug again lol. The chambers on those heads are also not deshrouded(stock except polishing) and they were only milled .006" or so(just a clean up pass). So the 2.02 valve is being shrouded a little more than what the stock valve would be. I done this to keep the chamber size as close to stock size as possible since gomer needed em unmilled for PtoV clearance at that time. I think those are good #s as well
Link to pix of these heads(which most probably have already seen):
www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=316041

gomer, how far off was the tune when ya checked it with the duals?
Old 11-26-2005, 10:56 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bo White
gomer, how far off was the tune when ya checked it with the duals?
LOL, you must have heard how bad it was off The first run was 15:1 A/F at WOT. I couldn't belive it had changed that much from just the exhaust. And to think I had been beating on it for the past couple of days with it that lean
Old 11-26-2005, 11:03 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I know my car was off by a full point with just headers so I know yours had to been way off with those duals . Glad to have done a set for ya when I was still sponsorin
Old 11-26-2005, 11:09 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
ta_silver_bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Moundville, AL
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice numbers now hopefully i can get all my stuff together and hop on the rollers to
Old 11-27-2005, 02:10 AM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (18)
 
juicedSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fayette,Alabama
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

those are some good numbers. got any of those heads layin around?? lol
Old 11-27-2005, 04:33 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Haans249's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,045
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Hey Gomer,
Thanks for your quick response on the other post....

How come you lost so much power after switching out your supposably worse heads, and smaller cam? I see that before you would have pulled somewhere about 465 with the belt, but now you only did 440? With the bigger cam, and better flowing heads, along with the FAST 90 setup...where did the 20 hp go? Maybe your cam is too big for stock CI.

Keep us update on the heads/cam swaps though!!! Very interested to see!

Regards,
Adrian
Old 11-27-2005, 04:35 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Haans249
Hey Gomer,
Thanks for your quick response on the other post....

How come you lost so much power after switching out your supposably worse heads, and smaller cam? I see that before you would have pulled somewhere about 465 with the belt, but now you only did 440? With the bigger cam, and better flowing heads, along with the FAST 90 setup...where did the 20 hp go? Maybe your cam is too big for stock CI.

Keep us update on the heads/cam swaps though!!! Very interested to see!

Regards,
Adrian
The heads that are on the car now are stock combustion chamber sized (compared to 58cc on the older heads) , smaller intake, and exhaust valves, and don't flow anywhere near as much air. I was only expecting 430rwhp at best with the combo that's on there now... so I was VERY surprised when I got the numbers above. In short, the heads I have now aren't anywhere as "max effort" as the ones I had before.
Old 11-27-2005, 05:11 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Haans249's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,045
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I see, didn't realize that the heads you have on now are not as good as the ones you had before. Even with your new FAST setup and larger cam, your heads are now the limiting factor. That explains it.
I have some, on a stock LS1
Patriot LS6 style Stage 3 heads with 2.055/1.57 valves handported running 327cfm at .6 lift w/ 61cc chambers, unmilled
FAST 90 setup
Edlebrock 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8th headers
and some other misc bolt-ons. (Volant CAI, 85mm MAF, ORY, !AIR, !CATS, U/D pulley)
Stock 10bolt with 3.73s, its an M6

If I were to stick the FMS F13, the same one you had before, should I expect to see 460-470 to the wheels? What about the F15....this will be daily driven btw haha. Which one would clear without me having to flycut? Sorry if i'm stealing your thread, really curious though!

Regards,
Adrian
Old 11-27-2005, 05:29 PM
  #14  
...with cheese.
iTrader: (41)
 
Armageddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cool man, glad to hear things are going well for you! I'll be bugging you again shortly with my 408. I put a Spec 3 in that White T-Rex car you tuned. It's doing really well, I would recommend Gomer's tuning to anyone!
Old 11-27-2005, 05:47 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Haans249
I see, didn't realize that the heads you have on now are not as good as the ones you had before. Even with your new FAST setup and larger cam, your heads are now the limiting factor. That explains it.
I have some, on a stock LS1
Patriot LS6 style Stage 3 heads with 2.055/1.57 valves handported running 327cfm at .6 lift w/ 61cc chambers, unmilled
FAST 90 setup
Edlebrock 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8th headers
and some other misc bolt-ons. (Volant CAI, 85mm MAF, ORY, !AIR, !CATS, U/D pulley)
Stock 10bolt with 3.73s, its an M6

If I were to stick the FMS F13, the same one you had before, should I expect to see 460-470 to the wheels? What about the F15....this will be daily driven btw haha. Which one would clear without me having to flycut? Sorry if i'm stealing your thread, really curious though!

Regards,
Adrian
I've had both the F13 and F15, along with installing/tuning several of them along the way in other people's cars. IMHO the F13 is a better cam than the F15. The F15's I've done haven't really made that much more power than the F13's. The F13 112 +2 is one of my favorite cams of all time. That would be my suggestion for you.
Old 11-27-2005, 06:44 PM
  #16  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

There is a ton of power to be had with stock heads,ported and stock valve size(forget the 2.02's).

Gomer- have you tried a good set of 241's ported,shaved to 10.8-1 comp. and a smaller Cam?

Reason I ask is because we have a car that last put out 438hp/420tq with "home ported" heads,stock valves,TR224 on 112 Cam,12bolt-4.11 gears,FAST 78mm intake. It was the best midrange power we've ever seen out of a H/C setup. A bigger Cam would definitely boost the power
Old 11-29-2005, 08:55 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
STRIPSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
There is a ton of power to be had with stock heads,ported and stock valve size(forget the 2.02's).

Gomer- have you tried a good set of 241's ported,shaved to 10.8-1 comp. and a smaller Cam?

Reason I ask is because we have a car that last put out 438hp/420tq with "home ported" heads,stock valves,TR224 on 112 Cam,12bolt-4.11 gears,FAST 78mm intake. It was the best midrange power we've ever seen out of a H/C setup. A bigger Cam would definitely boost the power
What casting is the 241? 01+ or ls6? just curious
Old 11-29-2005, 09:39 AM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
 
DramaFoYoMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The 241 is the 01+ LS1 head.
Old 11-30-2005, 01:05 PM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
MARKSZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: bama bitch
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nice numbers *******
Old 11-30-2005, 03:41 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Worm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My 2000 WS6 had 241s


Quick Reply: Bo White #241's, FAST 90, F15 cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.