Finally, my AFR/F13 dyno
#21
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
SAE was 5-10 lower, cant remember for sure though. With the new tune in there I think its got enough in it to go 435/420 SAE based on what the car was picking up with a slight lean out of AFR.
Did you get an SAE graph??? or just the STD???
#22
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
just STD, I may be getting the SAE as well though, I *think* it was right around 425/410-415 SAE. pretty damn close to what you did if you factor in that my heads arent milled. i figured the bump in compression and playing with the tune would get me around 440ish SAE. I just want to run about 11.0-11.5:1 CR so I am waiting on a forged bottom end. prob lighten up the ls7 clutch with an alum flywheel as well at the same time.
i just looked at that tonight too, uncorrected sounded even better 439/426ish lol of course i can remember the better numbers if i get one ill post it up i am trying to get the file
i just looked at that tonight too, uncorrected sounded even better 439/426ish lol of course i can remember the better numbers if i get one ill post it up i am trying to get the file
Last edited by WS6FirebirdTA00; 02-28-2006 at 11:14 PM.
#23
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
peace
#27
425rwhp @ 410rwtq are awesome with stock compression AFR heads! With 11.0-1 and better quench setup you should come close to 440rwhp and pick up alot under the curve.
#28
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
ill try to get the SAE graph up, I have the files so I just have to figure out how to use it and print it off. I was still quite impressed with the numbers under the curve compaired to similar setups. SAE is 424/411 (everyone around here uses STD from what I have seen or else I would have got SAE in the first place). My AFR is about 0.4 rich on me up top so I am hoping to lean that out and maybe get 430/415. Then throw a ported fast intake on the car and see what she does then.
They dynoed a cobra that night, pulley, CAI, exhuast and tune...489/501...made me want to buy more parts lol. I have been thinking about getting those MLS gaskets out of there for some cometics gaskets when I did the intake. I am not quite ready to mill the heads because I may shoot for about 11.5:1 on a forged 346 so I dont want to mill them 2 times. Any of you guys think it would be a good idea for the thinner gaskets for the better quench and slightly higher compression?
They dynoed a cobra that night, pulley, CAI, exhuast and tune...489/501...made me want to buy more parts lol. I have been thinking about getting those MLS gaskets out of there for some cometics gaskets when I did the intake. I am not quite ready to mill the heads because I may shoot for about 11.5:1 on a forged 346 so I dont want to mill them 2 times. Any of you guys think it would be a good idea for the thinner gaskets for the better quench and slightly higher compression?
#29
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
Any of you guys think it would be a good idea for the thinner gaskets for the better quench and slightly higher compression?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/451387-re-dyno-d-my-afr205-head-cam-after-milling.html
#30
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
damn good numbers man. id like to know if the extra weight from the ls7 clutch hurts the power. ive been told it does but dont know whether to believe it or not, although it felt quite a bit heavier than my spec....before it broke at 5k miles
125.67 mph trap in the 1/4, damn thats good lol
125.67 mph trap in the 1/4, damn thats good lol
#31
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
damn good numbers man. id like to know if the extra weight from the ls7 clutch hurts the power. ive been told it does but dont know whether to believe it or not, although it felt quite a bit heavier than my spec....before it broke at 5k miles
125.67 mph trap in the 1/4, damn thats good lol
125.67 mph trap in the 1/4, damn thats good lol
#33
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
F13 112+4, AFR 205, 66cc heads, 10:1 CR, LS7 cltuch LS2 steel flywheel
I think the car still had more left in it, I had yet to put my new tune in there with my latest changes but overall it wansnt too bad, little lean in torque area and too rich towards higher rpm/power areas.
EDIT: I got my SAE files, I was kinda confused cause the ones I look at from guys around here are STD and that is the print out I got.
SAE
424 rwhp
411 rwtq
I think the car still had more left in it, I had yet to put my new tune in there with my latest changes but overall it wansnt too bad, little lean in torque area and too rich towards higher rpm/power areas.
EDIT: I got my SAE files, I was kinda confused cause the ones I look at from guys around here are STD and that is the print out I got.
SAE
424 rwhp
411 rwtq
I'm expecting at least 450 rwhp with this setup, hopefully more.
#36
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
as of right now, no, those plans are still in the air though. i was thinking about doing that next spring but as of now it looks like i will have to get a rear end then, had some unexpected expenses lol
#37
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
as of right now, no, those plans are still in the air though. i was thinking about doing that next spring but as of now it looks like i will have to get a rear end then, had some unexpected expenses lol
#38
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
not yet, but before i do anything crazy with this setup i am going to get a new rear end. i just bought the fast intake since i was able to get it new at a great price. if i am satisfied with the power and torque i can make from this setup i may run it for a while. who knows though, **** can brake and plans can change lol
#39
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
not yet, but before i do anything crazy with this setup i am going to get a new rear end. i just bought the fast intake since i was able to get it new at a great price. if i am satisfied with the power and torque i can make from this setup i may run it for a while. who knows though, **** can brake and plans can change lol
Ya, I am basically in the same boat. I want a 402, but I need to finish building the drivetrain/suspension to handle it before getting the engine. All the other expenses interfere with my ability to spend absurd amounts of money on my car!