do you believe that? 316rwhp/298rwtq what is wrong?
#22
i scanned the dyno of my 2000 LS1 camaro. mods are in the sig. :
http://community.webshots.com/myphot...ecurity=ljoALm
how much rwhp/rwtq i would gain with tunning?
thanks
http://community.webshots.com/myphot...ecurity=ljoALm
how much rwhp/rwtq i would gain with tunning?
thanks
#23
hey abdullah i am guessing u need more ignition timing, u might also want to try richning that to about 12.8 or so, according to trials some cars like to be leaner and others like to be a lil' richer. try advancing the cam the cam seems to be a lil big for that compression
#24
Originally Posted by maxxxboost
hey abdullah i am guessing u need more ignition timing, u might also want to try richning that to about 12.8 or so, according to trials some cars like to be leaner and others like to be a lil' richer. try advancing the cam the cam seems to be a lil big for that compression
thanks for the reply maxxxboost but my friend just sold his car (grin).
now it is time for my 2000 LS1 camaro (grin).
#25
Originally Posted by maxxxboost
hey abdullah i am guessing u need more ignition timing, u might also want to try richning that to about 12.8 or so, according to trials some cars like to be leaner and others like to be a lil' richer. try advancing the cam the cam seems to be a lil big for that compression
#26
thanks for the info Houston999.
i just installed Koni SA shocks and ES hyperflex bushings kit in my 2000 LS1 camaro and truely the car is handling now much better than before i'm happy for that. my next mod will be Griffin radiator ( or UMI upper and lower front A-arms and adjustable torque arm).
i just installed Koni SA shocks and ES hyperflex bushings kit in my 2000 LS1 camaro and truely the car is handling now much better than before i'm happy for that. my next mod will be Griffin radiator ( or UMI upper and lower front A-arms and adjustable torque arm).
#27
First off, some of you ls1 guys make me laugh. You really have some low opinions/knowledge of LT1s.
You have those spiks up top because your too lean. Richen it up some.
I made peak hp @ 12.5:1 A/F and actually lost a tiny bit of hp and gaied some torque by going to 12.8:1 A/F. My setup was 3.5 yr old LE heads and 230/236 .544/.556 114lsa cam:
Here is the dynocharts fom the same day:
You have those spiks up top because your too lean. Richen it up some.
I made peak hp @ 12.5:1 A/F and actually lost a tiny bit of hp and gaied some torque by going to 12.8:1 A/F. My setup was 3.5 yr old LE heads and 230/236 .544/.556 114lsa cam:
Here is the dynocharts fom the same day:
#28
wow, thats not good at all. my stock headed XE 224/230 camd car with full bolt ons (X-pipe, longtubes, intake) and a PCMforless tune put down 342 wheel horsepower.
and a lot of you ls1 guys in this thread know **** about lt1s LOL
and a lot of you ls1 guys in this thread know **** about lt1s LOL
#29
Originally Posted by Abdullah
i scanned the dyno of my 2000 LS1 camaro. mods are in the sig. :
http://community.webshots.com/myphot...ecurity=ljoALm
how much rwhp/rwtq i would gain with tunning?
thanks
http://community.webshots.com/myphot...ecurity=ljoALm
how much rwhp/rwtq i would gain with tunning?
thanks
- As for the LT1 car, yea ur down on power big time. My old 95 Z 6sp made around 295rwhp with BBK 1 5/8in shorties, 2.5in ory, slp LM, FIPK, spec2 clutch w/ aluminum flywheel, and other usual stuff except ported TB & ud pulley . Had stock heads/cam and a .030 overbore. Then on a 75 dry shot it made 372rwhp. These runs were made on the same day using a portable chassis dyno which i know can be a little optimistic sometimes but you get the idea. On motor it went 13.1@108mph w/ a 2.1 60ft(sucks bad, I know) on 275/60 15in bfg DRs with my friend driving it(same guy i bought it from)