Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

How far off are my dyno #s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2006, 08:48 AM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default How far off are my dyno #s?

How far off are my dyno #s?

Setup is:

LS1 (Forged Pistons)
-Stock LS6 heads
-HPE S-Cam (238/242, .608/612 on a 115 LSA)
-Underdrive Pulleys
-Long Tubes
-Lid
-Cutout
-Ported Throttle Body
-Ported Oil Pump
-Double Roller Timing Chain
-NGK Plugs
-MSD Plug Wires
-Z06 Clutch/Slave
-3:42s/M6
-Tuned

I made 385 rwhp on dynojet. A few folks are telling me that those numbers are way too low. Where should I be? Now granted, when my car was dynoed it was with a bad TP sensor that was throwing the idle way off and also giving me 12-14 mpg. Does that have anything to do with the low numbers, I don't know. Now the sensor has been replaced and I haven't been able to get it back to the dyno. Thanks for your input.

Last edited by anLS1x2; 08-24-2006 at 07:01 AM. Reason: TP sensor instead of throttle body sensor
Old 08-22-2006, 07:54 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Anyone? Here is the dyno sheet.

Old 08-22-2006, 08:21 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
redtail2426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester,Ny
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what was your air/fuel ration and how much timing are you running??Who tuned it?
Old 08-22-2006, 08:24 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
redtail2426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester,Ny
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

and get it redone since the fix,it may have helped..
Old 08-22-2006, 09:07 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

my uneducated guess would be your cam is too big and the 115 lsa isn't helping either.even so you seem to be down around 30 rw.i would think a cam that big would clear 400 rw easily ,but your dcr is way low so that may be the problem.
CAM GURUS INSIDE PLEASE !
Old 08-22-2006, 11:05 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
 
RoastEmSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

torque curve looks awful, somethings wrong
Old 08-23-2006, 12:47 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Post

Get it tuned and go from there....
Old 08-23-2006, 07:13 AM
  #8  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow trap
my uneducated guess would be your cam is too big and the 115 lsa isn't helping either.even so you seem to be down around 30 rw.i would think a cam that big would clear 400 rw easily ,but your dcr is way low so that may be the problem.
CAM GURUS INSIDE PLEASE !
There are guys around here who are running the same cam I have, with a tune, with stock LS1 heads, who are putting down 430 rwhp, so they say. Even the guy who tuned it said that it should be higher. I just need to put it back on the dyno and see what happens. I just wanted to see what range y'all might think I should be in before I get it re-dynoed so that I am not dissapointed when the numbers stay were they are at or don't rise much at all.
Old 08-23-2006, 01:32 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

with a cam that size on stock heads i would think you should be over 415 rw easily tuned with 380 rwtq.
Old 08-23-2006, 01:39 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow trap
with a cam that size on stock heads i would think you should be over 415 rw easily tuned with 380 rwtq.
Yeah, I just got an email from the tuner telling me to bring my car back so that he can re-tune it with the TP sensor fix. He just told me that he has tuned S-Cam/Bolt-on only cars at 460 rwhp!!! WOW! So what does that mean that my Heads/Cam/Bolt-on car will make? I hope to have it over there next week, so I will post up the results.
Old 08-23-2006, 02:25 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by anLS1x2
.... He just told me that he has tuned S-Cam/Bolt-on only cars at 460 rwhp!!! WOW! ...
S-Cam? I hope he didnt say this was on stock heads/intake. There is no way a cam only bolt on car is making more than 420RWHP. You need a re-tune with a good sensor etc.
Old 08-23-2006, 02:57 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Trust
S-Cam?
HPE S-Cam (238/242, .608/612 on a 115 LSA)

Originally Posted by Trust
I hope he didnt say this was on stock heads/intake. There is no way a cam only bolt on car is making more than 420RWHP. You need a re-tune with a good sensor etc.
The tuner is Chuck from HPE, he is probably the best tuner down here in Texas. He has the world LT1 record and The fastest stock LS1 record! He knows how to tune them. I wouldn't doubt that he can get those kind of numbers. And it was probably with FAST 90/90.
Old 08-23-2006, 04:06 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
lilbuddy1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trust
S-Cam? I hope he didnt say this was on stock heads/intake. There is no way a cam only bolt on car is making more than 420RWHP. You need a re-tune with a good sensor etc.
The 460rwhp S-cammed car is an ls2 GTO. So very believeable, but the cam IMHO is garbage.
Old 08-23-2006, 04:11 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
The 460rwhp S-cammed car is an ls2 GTO. So very believeable, but the cam IMHO is garbage.
I'm curious as to why you don't believe in the S-cam? Did you or someone you know have a bad experience with one?
Old 08-23-2006, 04:45 PM
  #15  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

In a nutshell:

Chuck and Eric from HPE = Badass tuners, builders and racers.

HPE S-Cam in a low compression cam-only LS1 = Bad

Why? Intake valve closing point is way too late for a 346, which lowers dynamic compression and tries to force a power peak past the harmonic resonance of the LS6/FAST intake. The exhaust valve opening is too early for a naturally aspirated 346 which will bleed off cylinder pressure too early during the power stroke.

I don't know why people buy this cam for a cam-only 346. It's much better suited for a large displacement motor running a power adder, but not a low compression, small displacement naturally aspirated motor.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 08-23-2006, 05:41 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
lilbuddy1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anLS1x2
I'm curious as to why you don't believe in the S-cam? Did you or someone you know have a bad experience with one?
Refer to what patrick g. above me said
Old 08-23-2006, 09:10 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
In a nutshell:

Chuck and Eric from HPE = Badass tuners, builders and racers.

HPE S-Cam in a low compression cam-only LS1 = Bad

Why? Intake valve closing point is way too late for a 346, which lowers dynamic compression and tries to force a power peak past the harmonic resonance of the LS6/FAST intake. The exhaust valve opening is too early for a naturally aspirated 346 which will bleed off cylinder pressure too early during the power stroke.

I don't know why people buy this cam for a cam-only 346. It's much better suited for a large displacement motor running a power adder, but not a low compression, small displacement naturally aspirated motor.
I think Chuck would have mentioned something to me about going with a smaller cam if he knew that the S-cam would suck for my application. Actually it was Chuck's idea to begin with to put the S-cam in my car. Long story short, he built me a new motor after I flooded the old one. He used a stock short block except for the forged pistons that he used. The rest is in the list at the top of this thread. I have no idea what the CR is for my motor but I know that the CR is higher than a stock LS1 because of the LS6 heads (obviously).
Old 08-23-2006, 10:11 PM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
The 460rwhp S-cammed car is an ls2 GTO. So very believeable, but the cam IMHO is garbage.
Right, but in a 6.0L with LS6 heads, I just dont see a LS1 with 241 heads and LS6 intake touching 460 to the wheels cam only.

EDIT: Ok, I just re read it and saw he has LS6 heads, my mistake!
Old 08-31-2006, 08:25 AM
  #19  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
anLS1x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellville, Texas
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well I had the car re-tuned and re-dynoed on Tuesday. I'm bummed. It was dynoed with the cap on the cutout and in 100+ degree weather. I sure hope it is putting down at least 400 with the cap off and in cooler weather. Like everyone says, "Take it to the track - dynoes don't mean nothing."



Old 08-31-2006, 09:01 AM
  #20  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

If that Cam was a 110 duration it would rip.The 115 duration is killing it.

The graph is not very smooth.Maybe there is a problem somewhere too.


Quick Reply: How far off are my dyno #s?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.