Torquer 2 & Bolt ons
#29
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there are not that many, maybe one, person here where i live that tunes.
idle problems, surge and bucking, not driveable.
that's why i am very surprise in a good way to have found your thread, and see how happy you are with it!man! that's awesome!
it does begin to pull a little to high for me, i think.
well, you tell me, 3800rpm, but before that?
how does it feel driving before the 3800?
idle problems, surge and bucking, not driveable.
that's why i am very surprise in a good way to have found your thread, and see how happy you are with it!man! that's awesome!
it does begin to pull a little to high for me, i think.
well, you tell me, 3800rpm, but before that?
how does it feel driving before the 3800?
#30
under 3800 its perfect. very tame but of course its torquey! i have over 300 ft/lbs at around 2900 rpms, so its moves pretty good. of course with a cam this big ur losing some low end for top end, but i dont plan on trying to race under 3500-3800 rpms
before the tune it was surging and had major bucking problems under like 1100 rpms. but it allllll changed with the tune
before the tune it was surging and had major bucking problems under like 1100 rpms. but it allllll changed with the tune
#31
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
very tame and very torquey!!! magic words!
no one has told me this, thanks man!!
330lbstq at 2900rpm, that is healthy.
that's what i want torquey, tame for driving around, but when it comes time to race, then, we have the power, right?
thanks,
listen, i got run, but i will check this thread later on.
if you don't mind, i would like to talk to you some more about it, before i get a buyer, ha,ha
later
javier
no one has told me this, thanks man!!
330lbstq at 2900rpm, that is healthy.
that's what i want torquey, tame for driving around, but when it comes time to race, then, we have the power, right?
thanks,
listen, i got run, but i will check this thread later on.
if you don't mind, i would like to talk to you some more about it, before i get a buyer, ha,ha
later
javier
#33
Originally Posted by sidewayz28
solid numbers 5LETR. are you running cats? what rpms did u peak at? i moved my rev limiter to 6500 JUST TO BE SAFE. the thing pulled all the way to 6300-6400. very similar to my graph!
#34
Banned
iTrader: (115)
Originally Posted by sidewayz28
c5_ls1.. to answer your question i dont believe the numbers were changed. someone with heads/cam(TR224 + PRC stage 2.5)only put down about 410/3xx -dont remember torque exactly.
I was very impressed when he posted his numbers. I even called and talked to Tom about it. He came close to an FM13 with Tea heads as well. Same hp output as me but not as much torque.
So the differences are your exaust. He said you have 3 inch Y. How big are your headers?
#36
Banned
iTrader: (115)
Mine are 2.5 off the collector with a 2.5 catted y pipe into the factory d/d.
You've got 3 inch all the way into a hooker catback right? Could account for some missing hp on my end maybe. I was asking Tom if my heads would improve the torque at all. I was very impressed with the cam only numbers.
You've got 3 inch all the way into a hooker catback right? Could account for some missing hp on my end maybe. I was asking Tom if my heads would improve the torque at all. I was very impressed with the cam only numbers.
#37
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My car did 401rwhp/380rwtq with the TRQ2 cam and headers, still had the stock ls1 intake, stock pulley and stock TB. Now it has a nitrous tune with some timing pulled and it did 386rwhp. Cam has a nice powerband and pulls well, I think a ls6, asp pulley and ported TB would wake it up even more.