offaxis

iTrader: (19)

There seems to be some really friendly dynos around you guys.

These cars should run mid 10`s all day NA with that kind of power.

Congrats

chris93266

iTrader: (5)

i only made 333 with a 02 z06 cam on the same dyno. i had all the same mods except the headers, exhaust, & heads.

offaxis

iTrader: (19)

Congrats on the numbers. Thats the highest a4 dyno sheet ive seen with a ls6 intake. You are making more power than some m6 cars with simular pkgs. Like I said mid 10s all day shouldnt be a problem with that much power.

Have fun

DEEZ98Z

iTrader: (5)

Nice numbers! Was that unlocked???

chris93266

iTrader: (5)

unlocked

brad8266

iTrader: (23)

Great torque all though the entire rpm range

nahasapeemapetalon

iTrader: (9)

unreal, i gotta get my car dynoed and tuned where u go haha
look at my sig

offaxis

iTrader: (19)

If you are telling me you make 442 sae unlocked you live in la la land. Not that it matters either way but your converter is locked on those sheets you posted.

BTW .. You have a very impressive dyno sheet . Im not trying to put down your combo lets just be accurate

offaxis

iTrader: (19)

I dont think you are anywhere near 453 on a dynojet with the 224 cam

Guys I think you guys need to put the crack pipes down. Im not trying to rain on your parade but its just not gonna happen

chris93266

iTrader: (5)

hmm well i don't have a lock switch, so i assumed it was unlocked. isn't that usually the case?

bandit1

iTrader: (12)

Dont hate the player hate the game, im not an 18 year old kid trying to act cool sayin I have all this power, I am a 34 year old man that works for a living and owned more than my fair share of muscle cars, lm also a mechanic with 20+ years of experience to back me up, so if you are not seeing the numbers you want then you have alot more to worry about than what I am and am not making with my 224 cam!!!! Maybe the guy on the mustang dyno fubared something and it read wrong, maybe my car is making that kind of power with a smaller 224 cam maybe the world is round and not flat hey you can sit there on the computer all day long with your woulda coulda shouldas I prefer to do it!!!! You dont have to believe me like I really care what you want to believe Im the one driving my car not you. I will be going to another mustang dyno, there is only one dynojet here in my area and the guy never is around noone can get him to come dyno people. But I have a dyno day with my car club on the 21st and if I see lower numbers then ok if not then I will assume they are correct and whoever does not like it can kiss my

I made 378.8 just a few days ago on the exact same dyno and that was with my car totally untuned. To me its not hard to believe that I could gain 30RWHP from a good solid tune, underdrive and a home ported TB.

DEEZ98Z

iTrader: (5)

Your tuner can lock the converter while tunning it... you don't need a switch.

DEEZ98Z

iTrader: (5)

Those are solid numbers on a mustang dyno. The MD that we use around here is only a 20hp difference so I could see 430rwhp out of a 224 A guy here locally put down 435 with 5.3 heads/ 224 cam and a 6 speed

offaxis

iTrader: (19)

Bandit1

Im not a hater believe me. Unless you just reinvented the Wheel its not possible . I personally love the 224 cam but no offense but you didnt buy a great set of heads to make you have 20+ more hp than anyone on this board ever made with the 224 cam and a A4. I am just into whats real. BTW alot of mustang dyno are configured to give out dynojet numbers. I have seen dynos as high as 430 rwhp with a 224 caM but that was with a 90/90 setup . If you can do it do it but for a guy that knows so much ya bought heads that are only middle of the road at best. HAve fun in fantasy world

bandit1

iTrader: (12)

For one read the whole post before you start having a secondary conversation it helps alot. I use my car daily I perfer not to have to rev to the moon and back especially on an auto to make super high HP. Ok I will give that, its got alot to do with the dyno and the operator. But 2 days before I hit the 378.8, I went to a local guy with a bad drivers side O2 and a CEL and still managed to hit 353 RWHP, on a dynomite dyno, which is very similar to a mustang both enertia dynoes which place a load on the car and factoring in wind resistance and weight of the car etc etc. Anyway after fixing it, it felt so much better that I went and had it redynoed and thats when it hit 378.8 so if you go by PURE logic then either all the dyno operators around here are idiots and do not know how to operate said equipment, which is entirely possible or I may be acually making good numbers.

Okay lets move on too your next comment I bought heads that are middle of the road HHHUUUMMM, well first off I dont live in the land of money its the land of fantasy remember, and when I see a nice set of LS6 CNC ported heads, titanium retainers, nice gold springs good too .650 lift, ferra valves, 59cc chambers, 5 angle valve job etc etc and I get gaskets, crank bolt, cam, push rods by comp, and head bolt set for WELL under what i would spend for a set of AFRs or Darts I go for it. Now I will agree that for someone who has no automotive skills, like maybe you, buying a set of heads and wanting the best, these would not be a good choice, AFRs, trickflows maybe but when I have porting ability, access to a superflow 600 flow bench, a whole machine shop, and the experience of my uncle who built engines for INDY I can tell you that with the proper set up and the right touches and about 8 hours of hand porting checking measuring and gauging my LS6 heads equal flow in every lift after .300 as the trickflows or the AFRs going by their posted numbers. I got 321in and 228ex at .600 lift measuring at 28 inches without increasing the runner size meaning that I kept the velocity up while improving flow. So did i make a bad choice or did i just choose a cheaper way to get the flow numbers I wanted?

Am I making more than anyone has ever on the 224 well not as I see it I have gone through the dyno section and found more than I can count where people with the 224 are making over 400 in an auto with the 224 cam. So i guess everyone of us are high and gee fantasy land is sure alot better than "ignorant land" when you start doing mods to talk about on your car then we'll talk or maybe you have tried and failed and thats where all this repressed anger is coming from. If you read my post all I was doing was some bench numbers did I say I hit 453 no i said if what everyone says about dynojets is true key word is if. I did hit over 400 on a mustang was something screwy possibly but maybe just maybe not.

camarokid94

iTrader: (2)

i love my TSP 233-239

chris93266

iTrader: (5)

i'll have to ask my tuner if he locked the converter. i honestly doubt he did because we had just talked about the pros/cons of installing a lockup switch, and he was all against it. i'll check and get back with you.

BlackSuperchargedLS1

iTrader: (5)

nice numbers. I'm running the same setup, but M6.

thechef

iTrader: (13)

Offaxis its not worth fighting with these guys, i agree 453 aint happening with that set up, not that the car isnt making good power but i have never seen that power from that set up on our dynojet

enjoy your set up guys and post up when ya get to acrtually dynojet

bandit1

iTrader: (12)

Gee I guess even on non ford boards there are going to be the kind of people that DO NOT read the post, again I did not say I was maing 453 on a dynojet I simply said if i go by what i am told!!!!! Hooked on phonics its never to late to learn to read!!!! I did however say i made over 400 on a MD though