UPDATE: L92 408 results....new camshaft.
01-31-2007, 05:07 PM
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UPDATE: L92 408 results....new camshaft. Well, like we said we would, we changed the camshaft. Its a very slight change, not giant, but got us what we wanted. Second times a charm. 
We first started off with about 491hp and 494tq with the last cam, and now we are about 520 and 512tq. Not bad for a cam change. Enjoy.
Rick
We first started off with about 491hp and 494tq with the last cam, and now we are about 520 and 512tq. Not bad for a cam change. Enjoy.
Rick
01-31-2007, 05:34 PM
#2
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know whats better: that I got a few extra hundred rpm that I I wanted... or the fact that I have minimal additional lope
Thanks Rick job well done. I was at work earlier when you called so it really didn't dawn on me what you had told me until I got home and saw this.
Thanks Rick job well done. I was at work earlier when you called so it really didn't dawn on me what you had told me until I got home and saw this.
Last edited by dame; 02-11-2007 at 03:54 PM.
01-31-2007, 06:00 PM
#3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow,that is a nice curve. do you care to give out cam specs or is it 
?
*re-edit* nevermind,i just checked the other thread,i'm a lazy idiot
?*re-edit* nevermind,i just checked the other thread,i'm a lazy idiot
Last edited by slow trap; 02-01-2007 at 02:31 PM.
01-31-2007, 06:30 PM
#4
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slow trap
*edit* nevermind,i just checked the other thread 
why roll your eyes...... we already stated the new cam specs........ well @.050 specs that is! feel free to try and duplicate them
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/626547-l92-408-first-results.html
Post #30
Trending Topics
01-31-2007, 11:50 PM
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome numbers! I am building a setup with a similar cam, but I am at 10.5:1 instead (unfortunately I bought this rotating assembly almost a year ago when the L92 was just on the horizon). Hopefully I can get close to what you have accomplished here.
-Geoff
-Geoff
02-01-2007, 02:33 AM
#11
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by White_Hawk
Awesome numbers! I am building a setup with a similar cam, but I am at 10.5:1 instead (unfortunately I bought this rotating assembly almost a year ago when the L92 was just on the horizon). Hopefully I can get close to what you have accomplished here.
-Geoff
-Geoff
Did you already call up Rick and purchase the cam?
02-01-2007, 07:42 AM
#12
Absolutely love it!! Did anyone else notice where the peak was? 6 grand outstanding!!! I think this really goes to show what these heads are capable of with the right cam. Congratulations dame, I hope you bought stock in a tire company, because you damn sure have a shredder on your hands!!
02-01-2007, 09:34 AM
#14
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WAY to go Rick!
Congrats Dame,.....wow you have learned a LOT the hard way glad it's paying off.
Rick,
Reading over the other threads I was originally thinking that a 114LSA would get the goals nailed down (driveability and tq across the PB). I did not think such a small change would be enough, but I may have been wrong. I can't wait to hear the bottle numbers.
How aggressive is the lobe profile Rick, would others consider it lazy?
I would still like to see what a 114LSA, 2 1/8" headers and increased volume for the rest of the exhaust would do to it.
That's what a sleeper should be like. Again, great job!
Congrats Dame,.....wow you have learned a LOT the hard way glad it's paying off.
Rick,
Reading over the other threads I was originally thinking that a 114LSA would get the goals nailed down (driveability and tq across the PB). I did not think such a small change would be enough, but I may have been wrong. I can't wait to hear the bottle numbers.
How aggressive is the lobe profile Rick, would others consider it lazy?
I would still like to see what a 114LSA, 2 1/8" headers and increased volume for the rest of the exhaust would do to it.
That's what a sleeper should be like. Again, great job!
Have a customer with a L92/4xx that appears to need a dif cam. Pretty sure hes already contacted you guys about one. not sure on the specs of the one he has
02-02-2007, 12:22 AM
#18
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the people that keep asking me for specs ( i think they are mistaken my setup for the other one in here) I don't mind posting them AGAIN.....
1st cam 230/244 116=2 LSA
NEW cam 236/246 115 LSA
1st cam 230/244 116=2 LSA
NEW cam 236/246 115 LSA
