Cam only Ls1 440rwhp (Vengeance + Harris Tune)
03-10-2007, 11:29 PM
#22
TECH Addict
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere I Belong
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn !! Very impressive numbers man 
peace
Originally Posted by 347fairless
Lets just say this cam kicks some ***.
Vengeance Vindicator Cam
Specs: 240/244 608/598 112
Vengeance Vindicator Cam
Specs: 240/244 608/598 112
peace
03-10-2007, 11:59 PM
#25
Originally Posted by 347fairless
I'm gonna attempt to back these up on Tuesday on a Dynojet 224. Gut feeling is they will be 5-10 lower on Tuesday.
Hell my old combo woulda only put out 380-385rwhp tops (got valve float past 5800 and I never got a chance to get it back on the dyno before it blew a head gasket), but I still managed 118mph in a full weight car in the 1/4. If you trap 122+ you obviously are backing up the #'s, but if you are <120 then something is obviously wrong. I'm curious to see how it runs. Last edited by speed_demon24; 03-11-2007 at 12:05 AM.
03-11-2007, 03:39 AM
#26
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
I'de save ur $$ unless you want to pay for dyno #'s, track #'s (mph for power) are what count not dyno #'s. Hell my old combo woulda only put out 380-385rwhp tops (got valve float past 5800 and I never got a chance to get it back on the dyno before it blew a head gasket), but I still managed 118mph in a full weight car in the 1/4. If you trap 122+ you obviously are backing up the #'s, but if you are <120 then something is obviously wrong. I'm curious to see how it runs.
Hell my old combo woulda only put out 380-385rwhp tops (got valve float past 5800 and I never got a chance to get it back on the dyno before it blew a head gasket), but I still managed 118mph in a full weight car in the 1/4. If you trap 122+ you obviously are backing up the #'s, but if you are <120 then something is obviously wrong. I'm curious to see how it runs.
03-11-2007, 10:26 AM
#28
FormerVendor
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Glenolden, PA
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Um, no it's not, it's a Dynocom Dyno. Regardless look forword to seeing some track numbers. 
Matt
Matt
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
It's a mustang dyno, but apparently its calibrated to run with dyno-jets.
03-11-2007, 11:18 AM
#29
Congrats on the numbers! Tq. curve is killer. Looks like 400 @ about 3400ish and carries all the way over to about 5700ish. Not too shabby!
I swear... it's never enough for some folks, but when it is, all of a sudden it's BS.
I guess it must be true that everyone who uses VRD's cams or H/C combos is also useing bad dyno's/operators that are over inflating the numbers........
Then when their junk goes 6's @ 100+ or traps 120 or better in full weight street cars, it's once again still not quite enough
So sad-
I was at the shop yesterday drooling over my new VRD L92 stroker build when Ron got your e-mail.
Brought a smile to everyone's face
Look forward to seeing some more impressive numbers out of the VRD camp-
I swear... it's never enough for some folks, but when it is, all of a sudden it's BS.
I guess it must be true that everyone who uses VRD's cams or H/C combos is also useing bad dyno's/operators that are over inflating the numbers........
Then when their junk goes 6's @ 100+ or traps 120 or better in full weight street cars, it's once again still not quite enough
So sad-
I was at the shop yesterday drooling over my new VRD L92 stroker build when Ron got your e-mail.
Brought a smile to everyone's face
Look forward to seeing some more impressive numbers out of the VRD camp-
Last edited by SLowETz; 03-11-2007 at 11:24 AM.
03-11-2007, 11:38 AM
#31
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Cmon even you have to know those #'s are hard to believe, expecially through a flowmaster, one of my friends gained 25rwhp with a cutout and he only put down 375rwhp. Now if you go to the track and trap 122+ I'll shut my mouth. 
03-11-2007, 11:43 AM
#32
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLowETz
Congrats on the numbers! Tq. curve is killer. Looks like 400 @ about 3400ish and carries all the way over to about 5700ish. Not too shabby!
I swear... it's never enough for some folks, but when it is, all of a sudden it's BS.
I guess it must be true that everyone who uses VRD's cams or H/C combos is also useing bad dyno's/operators that are over inflating the numbers........
Then when their junk goes 6's @ 100+ or traps 120 or better in full weight street cars, it's once again still not quite enough
So sad-
I was at the shop yesterday drooling over my new VRD L92 stroker build when Ron got your e-mail.
Brought a smile to everyone's face
Look forward to seeing some more impressive numbers out of the VRD camp-
I swear... it's never enough for some folks, but when it is, all of a sudden it's BS.
I guess it must be true that everyone who uses VRD's cams or H/C combos is also useing bad dyno's/operators that are over inflating the numbers........
Then when their junk goes 6's @ 100+ or traps 120 or better in full weight street cars, it's once again still not quite enough
So sad-
I was at the shop yesterday drooling over my new VRD L92 stroker build when Ron got your e-mail.
Brought a smile to everyone's face
Look forward to seeing some more impressive numbers out of the VRD camp-
Somewhat better graph posted.
Last edited by 347fairless; 03-11-2007 at 12:12 PM.
03-11-2007, 12:41 PM
#36
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, I seriously don't understand how someone is getting 400 ft/lbs at 3,500 RPM's on a stock cube LS1 with stock heads, intake and a 240 dur camshaft.
Can anyone explains this to me, cause I'm lost????
Can anyone explains this to me, cause I'm lost????
03-11-2007, 12:58 PM
#38
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get rid of that Flowmaster Catback. People have gained 20+ rwhp by switching to a better exhaust, even the stock exhaust has given people better numbers on the dyno.
So true duals + 90/90 = 480 rwhp cam only?
Or go for true duals, TFS 215's and ported 90/90 for 550 rwhp NA 346?
So true duals + 90/90 = 480 rwhp cam only?
Or go for true duals, TFS 215's and ported 90/90 for 550 rwhp NA 346?
03-11-2007, 02:47 PM
#39
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stevewix
compression! It's advanced , that's the only thing that makes sense to me.
, that's the only thing that makes sense to me.Close to the same exact setup....
How do you get 30 more ft/lbs at 3,500 RPM's?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/651647-2002-z06-cam-only-vengeance-racing-vindicator-vs-competing-shop.html
I'm not trying to crack on anyone, Vengenance obviously knows what they are doing and have way more experience than I'll ever have, I'm just trying to understand how this car is making that much power. I went with a 228/232 in my LS2 GTO just to get this kind of a torque curve and gave up some topend to do so. This just looks like the best of both worlds and I don't understand how they got it.
03-11-2007, 02:47 PM
#40
TECH Enthusiast
Wow nice numbers. that thing should run good now. how do you like your HSW tune? i just got mine back from them a couple weeks ago and couldnt be happier. great people to deal with. also where at in philly are you?