408/AFR/T-rex on engine dyno
#22
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 5,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbo'd stang
Not my motor, so I didn't grab any sheets. I don't know a damn thing about engine dynos, but I think that it was around .4....sound right? I just paid attention to the WB to make sure it was ok during a pull.
#23
Got an update on the motor. It made 520/500 on the dyno today. That is through SLP headers/Y-pipe/single exhaust. Owner is talking about doing a true dual setup, so that should put it at 530-540.
#24
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbo'd stang
Got an update on the motor. It made 520/500 on the dyno today. That is through SLP headers/Y-pipe/single exhaust. Owner is talking about doing a true dual setup, so that should put it at 530-540.
#25
Originally Posted by 1936FordPU
He needs to ditch the headers first, John Cocktosten. Tell him Richard Thruster says hi!
I heard you guys did good the other night with the yellow car.
#28
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was expecting to see more than that honestly. I don't think that motor is cammed right. Although 630 fwhp is a lot, I've seen the same results with a lot less.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just suggesting there may be even more left in this combination.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just suggesting there may be even more left in this combination.
#29
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Studytime
I was expecting to see more than that honestly. I don't think that motor is cammed right. Although 630 fwhp is a lot, I've seen the same results with a lot less.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just suggesting there may be even more left in this combination.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just suggesting there may be even more left in this combination.
Great job Scott
#30
Originally Posted by Studytime
I was expecting to see more than that honestly. I don't think that motor is cammed right. Although 630 fwhp is a lot, I've seen the same results with a lot less.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just suggesting there may be even more left in this combination.
I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just suggesting there may be even more left in this combination.
#31
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You spelled it wrong. It's "Clouseau".
I was getting ready to qualify the statement I made by my own experience on the dyno, but I'd hate to be pointing out the obvious.
Good luck with it.
Ben T.
I was getting ready to qualify the statement I made by my own experience on the dyno, but I'd hate to be pointing out the obvious.
Good luck with it.
Ben T.
#33
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbo'd stang
Got an update on the motor. It made 520/500 on the dyno today. That is through SLP headers/Y-pipe/single exhaust. Owner is talking about doing a true dual setup, so that should put it at 530-540.
Only making 9 rwhp & 45 rwtq more than Christian's 'Vette . . . and he has a 346
Yeah . . . I'd change QUITE A FEW things on that big cube motor . . . ASAP
#34
Originally Posted by The Dragon
Dang. If I was him I'd be screaming
Only making 9 rwhp & 45 rwtq more than Christian's 'Vette . . . and he has a 346
Yeah . . . I'd change QUITE A FEW things on that big cube motor . . . ASAP
Only making 9 rwhp & 45 rwtq more than Christian's 'Vette . . . and he has a 346
Yeah . . . I'd change QUITE A FEW things on that big cube motor . . . ASAP
Ok hero, we all can't be dyno kings.
#35
Originally Posted by Studytime
You spelled it wrong. It's "Clouseau".
I was getting ready to qualify the statement I made by my own experience on the dyno, but I'd hate to be pointing out the obvious.
Good luck with it.
Ben T.
I was getting ready to qualify the statement I made by my own experience on the dyno, but I'd hate to be pointing out the obvious.
Good luck with it.
Ben T.
#39
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbo'd stang
Ok hero, we all can't be dyno kings.
Probably shouldn't have bothered posting in the dyno section or even be concerned about the dyno results of that motor . . . which you've indicated in your post
Good luck
#40
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Dragon
Dang. If I was him I'd be screaming
Only making 9 rwhp & 45 rwtq more than Christian's 'Vette . . . and he has a 346
Yeah . . . I'd change QUITE A FEW things on that big cube motor . . . ASAP
Only making 9 rwhp & 45 rwtq more than Christian's 'Vette . . . and he has a 346
Yeah . . . I'd change QUITE A FEW things on that big cube motor . . . ASAP
I am reading the comments from The Dragon as an informative help to give you a reference...
And I don't see the point about beeing a hero or beeing a dyno king...
I just imagine the amount of human, logistical plus money investment you are spending trying to create the best possible power with your project, respect for that.
The post of The Dragon seems pretty clear for me, with this size of engine you can expect a little more...but you have maybe already enough power to be satisfied with I guess!!!
Christian