LS1 A4 - AFR205 66cc - LG G5X3 114 - SW 1 3/4 - 3"catback true dual -Vigil 3200 Stall
07-07-2007, 01:51 PM
#1
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jeddah,Saudi Arabia
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS1 A4 - AFR205 66cc - LG G5X3 114 - SW 1 3/4 - 3"catback true dual -Vigil 3200 Stall Hi,
This is the dyno for my Lumina LS1 5.7 Stock shortblock
95F the air temp , 30in-Hg , 15% Humidity
in STOCK
Locked TC => 404.72 RWHP - 375.28 RWTorque
Unlokced => 383.10 RWHP - 332.34 RWTorque
Stock Intake LS6 and TB ...
26 Timing 95 Octane
The catback 3" TrueDual
What you think ?
What is the best WOT Shift point ?
This is the dyno for my Lumina LS1 5.7 Stock shortblock
95F the air temp , 30in-Hg , 15% Humidity
in STOCK
Locked TC => 404.72 RWHP - 375.28 RWTorque
Unlokced => 383.10 RWHP - 332.34 RWTorque
Stock Intake LS6 and TB ...
26 Timing 95 Octane
The catback 3" TrueDual
What you think ?
What is the best WOT Shift point ?
Last edited by ss2002; 07-07-2007 at 02:57 PM.
07-07-2007, 10:00 PM
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Good a4 numbers. However if you mill those heads you are going to find a lot more power with that combo. What is your compression with 66cc heads 10.25 to 1. I have one of LG's experimental cams that will be out later this year with a milled set of afr 205s (59cc) and made 490 rwhp 445 rwtq (M6) with those mods and all boltons. Think about milling them for more N/A power, or were you thinking FI (turbo/supercharger) down the road ?? At any rate good power bro.
07-10-2007, 06:57 AM
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by ss2002
Thank you allngn_c5
waiting more
waiting more
You are very welcome sir. I am glad to see yet another satisfied with LG Motorsports products customer. The x2 cam is perfect balance between mild and wild. Good peak numbers but very mannerable too.
Trending Topics
07-13-2007, 06:30 PM
#9
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good #'s but not to hijack I have that same cam only on a 112 and I have stock ls-1 heads and I made 409/390 I do have a 6spd car though. Does an auto really loose that much power over a manual, cuz I was looking at those heads and im a little weary now that I might not pick up as much power as I want.
07-18-2007, 02:06 PM
#11
Those #'s aren't too shabby. I thought you would get a little bit more with a good size cam like that.
I highly doubt you will hit 450 milling the heads, you're probably only leaving about 15rwhp on the table. Plus if you mill with that cam you're definately gonna have to flycut.
Now if you get a Fast 90 and TB, run no cats, underdrive pulley, and mill the heads you would be at 440+ probably.
Heck just a ported stock TB on a H/C car will net you like 10 rwhp. Again respectable #'s for whats done, congrats.
I highly doubt you will hit 450 milling the heads, you're probably only leaving about 15rwhp on the table. Plus if you mill with that cam you're definately gonna have to flycut.
Now if you get a Fast 90 and TB, run no cats, underdrive pulley, and mill the heads you would be at 440+ probably.
Heck just a ported stock TB on a H/C car will net you like 10 rwhp. Again respectable #'s for whats done, congrats.
07-19-2007, 07:08 AM
#12
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by DannoWS6
Heck just a ported stock TB on a H/C car will net you like 10 rwhp. Again respectable #'s for whats done, congrats.
Are you serious ?!?!? Maybe 5 rwhp if you are lucky.
07-19-2007, 07:10 AM
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Milling will help a lot more by raising compression. You'll find a lot of torque. As far as flycutting the g5x3, you don't have to. I got mine a couple of years ago, and LG Motorsports only flycutt for an added measure of safety. My heads are milled to 59 cc's as well. I have more cam now and am making a good amount more hp/tq then last year. Love the new R&D cam that Louis did for me. Will be on the market in the future.
07-19-2007, 08:54 AM
#14
Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Are you serious ?!?!? Maybe 5 rwhp if you are lucky.
As far as milling goes I agree you are leaving torque/power on the table, SCR would be much better at 11-1, but it won't make another 40rwhp,lol. Seriously even another 15-20 peak is doing real good at 59CC over 66. My heads are milled close to 60CC, and with my much smaller cam my PVC was pretty close, I'm running a stock gasket too.
I wouldn't trust the longevity of that cam and heads milled 59cc (if running a smaller gasket too). You might get away with it but I bet after a year or so of 6400rpm+ runs you're gonna see some nicks on those pistons. For piece of mind I would flycut. Or mill a little less like me
07-19-2007, 08:58 AM
#15
Banned
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Schaumburg,IL
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those are some nice gains...congrats
overall power I did expect more as most, but if you look at the before/after results the 404 rwhp looks more impresive.
The only thing I see wrong with your setup is the 3200 stall. IMO thats tight for your combination.
overall power I did expect more as most, but if you look at the before/after results the 404 rwhp looks more impresive.
The only thing I see wrong with your setup is the 3200 stall. IMO thats tight for your combination.
07-19-2007, 12:50 PM
#16
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by LS1 SPEED
those are some nice gains...congrats
overall power I did expect more as most, but if you look at the before/after results the 404 rwhp looks more impresive.
The only thing I see wrong with your setup is the 3200 stall. IMO thats tight for your combination.
overall power I did expect more as most, but if you look at the before/after results the 404 rwhp looks more impresive.
The only thing I see wrong with your setup is the 3200 stall. IMO thats tight for your combination.
07-25-2007, 10:36 PM
#20
Banned
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, I noticed you are only running 26* timing. Why? I'm running 29* on 93 octane (and probably still could give it more advance). You have 95 octane, and could probably get more hp with more advance. Talk to your tuner..