Dynoed tonight. Mustang dyno
Dynoed tonight. Mustang dyno Got tuned and dynoed tonight by Bret at FBC in Bmore, 99% of the problems i was having with the car are gone now.
Anyways on a mustang dyno it put down 378rwhp/348rwtq with:
MS3
Stock Heads
MTI Lid
Custom Smooth Bellows
Ported TB
Mac Mids/Cats
Dynomouth
3.42s
Are these numbers good? Im going to be getting a pulley after the gear change, going to 4.10s, and maybe next spring might switch to LTs or at least just gut out my cats i have now. So on a dynojet what would the numbers be, 408-416rwhp/377-383rwtq?
Anyways on a mustang dyno it put down 378rwhp/348rwtq with:
MS3
Stock Heads
MTI Lid
Custom Smooth Bellows
Ported TB
Mac Mids/Cats
Dynomouth
3.42s
Are these numbers good? Im going to be getting a pulley after the gear change, going to 4.10s, and maybe next spring might switch to LTs or at least just gut out my cats i have now. So on a dynojet what would the numbers be, 408-416rwhp/377-383rwtq?
Banned
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 1
From: Naperville, IL
To put things in perspective.. a mustang dyno is lower than a dynojet by 10-15% Most people use dynojet numbers because they read higher. In the sticky in the gen3 internal.. the "recipe for 500rwhp with heads/cam" the same engine put down just 440 on a stingy mustang dyno.
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
I have seen similar results with that camshaft on stock heads on that dyno.
Originally Posted by SupermanSS
Got tuned and dynoed tonight by Bret at FBC in Bmore, 99% of the problems i was having with the car are gone now.
Anyways on a mustang dyno it put down 378rwhp/348rwtq with:
MS3
Stock Heads
MTI Lid
Custom Smooth Bellows
Ported TB
Mac Mids/Cats
Dynomouth
3.42s
Are these numbers good? Im going to be getting a pulley after the gear change, going to 4.10s, and maybe next spring might switch to LTs or at least just gut out my cats i have now. So on a dynojet what would the numbers be, 408-416rwhp/377-383rwtq?
Anyways on a mustang dyno it put down 378rwhp/348rwtq with:
MS3
Stock Heads
MTI Lid
Custom Smooth Bellows
Ported TB
Mac Mids/Cats
Dynomouth
3.42s
Are these numbers good? Im going to be getting a pulley after the gear change, going to 4.10s, and maybe next spring might switch to LTs or at least just gut out my cats i have now. So on a dynojet what would the numbers be, 408-416rwhp/377-383rwtq?
Originally Posted by Asmodeus
To put things in perspective.. a mustang dyno is lower than a dynojet by 10-15% Most people use dynojet numbers because they read higher. In the sticky in the gen3 internal.. the "recipe for 500rwhp with heads/cam" the same engine put down just 440 on a stingy mustang dyno.
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Those numbers are inline with what we see on our dyno, considering you don't have LT's.
As far as accuracy, as long as a dyno is calibrated correctly, it's accurate, no matter what dyno it is. To compare apples to apples, it's more difficult. It's not just a straight 10% difference between Dyno Jets and Mustang Dyno's. In our experience, at 390rwhp on our dyno, a car will typically see just over 400rwhp on a DynoJet. At 420rwhp on our dyno, the same car will see between 450-460rwhp. At 600rwhp, the difference is even more, I've witnessed as much as an 80rwhp difference with the same car on two different dyno's (it was a Mustang MD-1700 at another location, and a DynoJet). Since the more power a vehicle produces, the Mustang Dyno's absorb more and more power. We tell our customer's that the difference is a conservative 7%.
Now which one is more "real world" is a totally different question. If you drive your car in a situation in which you have no mass and you're in a vacuum, so basically if you do intergalatic racing in space, use a DynoJet. If your car sees gravity, and has an aerodynamic coeffecient, and you race on a planet called Earth, then use a Mustang Dyno.
As far as accuracy, as long as a dyno is calibrated correctly, it's accurate, no matter what dyno it is. To compare apples to apples, it's more difficult. It's not just a straight 10% difference between Dyno Jets and Mustang Dyno's. In our experience, at 390rwhp on our dyno, a car will typically see just over 400rwhp on a DynoJet. At 420rwhp on our dyno, the same car will see between 450-460rwhp. At 600rwhp, the difference is even more, I've witnessed as much as an 80rwhp difference with the same car on two different dyno's (it was a Mustang MD-1700 at another location, and a DynoJet). Since the more power a vehicle produces, the Mustang Dyno's absorb more and more power. We tell our customer's that the difference is a conservative 7%.
Now which one is more "real world" is a totally different question. If you drive your car in a situation in which you have no mass and you're in a vacuum, so basically if you do intergalatic racing in space, use a DynoJet. If your car sees gravity, and has an aerodynamic coeffecient, and you race on a planet called Earth, then use a Mustang Dyno.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo TECH Enthusiast
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Interesting as I have seen the same escallating error between a md1750 de and a dynojet as well.
Originally Posted by Tuner@Straightline
Those numbers are inline with what we see on our dyno, considering you don't have LT's.
As far as accuracy, as long as a dyno is calibrated correctly, it's accurate, no matter what dyno it is. To compare apples to apples, it's more difficult. It's not just a straight 10% difference between Dyno Jets and Mustang Dyno's. In our experience, at 390rwhp on our dyno, a car will typically see just over 400rwhp on a DynoJet. At 420rwhp on our dyno, the same car will see between 450-460rwhp. At 600rwhp, the difference is even more, I've witnessed as much as an 80rwhp difference with the same car on two different dyno's (it was a Mustang MD-1700 at another location, and a DynoJet). Since the more power a vehicle produces, the Mustang Dyno's absorb more and more power. We tell our customer's that the difference is a conservative 7%.
Now which one is more "real world" is a totally different question. If you drive your car in a situation in which you have no mass and you're in a vacuum, so basically if you do intergalatic racing in space, use a DynoJet. If your car sees gravity, and has an aerodynamic coeffecient, and you race on a planet called Earth, then use a Mustang Dyno.
As far as accuracy, as long as a dyno is calibrated correctly, it's accurate, no matter what dyno it is. To compare apples to apples, it's more difficult. It's not just a straight 10% difference between Dyno Jets and Mustang Dyno's. In our experience, at 390rwhp on our dyno, a car will typically see just over 400rwhp on a DynoJet. At 420rwhp on our dyno, the same car will see between 450-460rwhp. At 600rwhp, the difference is even more, I've witnessed as much as an 80rwhp difference with the same car on two different dyno's (it was a Mustang MD-1700 at another location, and a DynoJet). Since the more power a vehicle produces, the Mustang Dyno's absorb more and more power. We tell our customer's that the difference is a conservative 7%.
Now which one is more "real world" is a totally different question. If you drive your car in a situation in which you have no mass and you're in a vacuum, so basically if you do intergalatic racing in space, use a DynoJet. If your car sees gravity, and has an aerodynamic coeffecient, and you race on a planet called Earth, then use a Mustang Dyno.
Originally Posted by Tuner@Straightline
Now which one is more "real world" is a totally different question. If you drive your car in a situation in which you have no mass and you're in a vacuum, so basically if you do intergalatic racing in space, use a DynoJet. If your car sees gravity, and has an aerodynamic coeffecient, and you race on a planet called Earth, then use a Mustang Dyno.
Originally Posted by Tuner@Straightline
Now which one is more "real world" is a totally different question. If you drive your car in a situation in which you have no mass and you're in a vacuum, so basically if you do intergalatic racing in space, use a DynoJet. If your car sees gravity, and has an aerodynamic coeffecient, and you race on a planet called Earth, then use a Mustang Dyno.
He's Superman, so I'd say a little of both
Nice numbers man.