Who's got the weakest H/C LS1 out there?
09-11-2008, 06:12 AM
#107
11 Second Club
1)05 LQ9 6.0
2)Futral FM14 232"/234" .598"/.598" 112LSA
3)Patriot Performance Dual gold Valve Springs
4)stock 317 heads hand ported,220cc intake runners,68cc chambers,313cfm intake,milled 0.030,10.8:1 compression,stock valves
5)ARP head bolts,ARP rod bolts
6)Vig3200/3:42s/auburn posi
7)standard bolt ons(lid,bellows,mass air ends,ported throttlebody pulley,LTs,cutout,etc)/stock LS6 intake
The heads were handported by a friend of mine.
Had it Dyno tuned by Allan Futral.
414rwhp unlocked
438rwhp locked
not bad.not great.. :p
2)Futral FM14 232"/234" .598"/.598" 112LSA
3)Patriot Performance Dual gold Valve Springs
4)stock 317 heads hand ported,220cc intake runners,68cc chambers,313cfm intake,milled 0.030,10.8:1 compression,stock valves
5)ARP head bolts,ARP rod bolts
6)Vig3200/3:42s/auburn posi
7)standard bolt ons(lid,bellows,mass air ends,ported throttlebody pulley,LTs,cutout,etc)/stock LS6 intake
The heads were handported by a friend of mine.
Had it Dyno tuned by Allan Futral.
414rwhp unlocked
438rwhp locked
not bad.not great.. :p
09-11-2008, 08:37 PM
#110
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gateway International Raceway
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The title says H/C not boosted application...but if you think you have something there you should start a lowest boosted application thread. I would be interested to see who posts up in there.
09-12-2008, 06:46 AM
#111
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, i am a truck here, but was dissappointed with my # as well.
370, 11:1 forged pistons, patriot stage 2 heads, .23x/.23x cam on a 112 LSA, hooker LT headers, 3K stall, 4.11 gears, CAI
only made 365 rwhp n/a torque was near 400 ft/lb
370, 11:1 forged pistons, patriot stage 2 heads, .23x/.23x cam on a 112 LSA, hooker LT headers, 3K stall, 4.11 gears, CAI
only made 365 rwhp n/a torque was near 400 ft/lb
09-12-2008, 07:03 AM
#112
"Who's got the weakest H/C LS1 out there?"
i didnt see where it said who has the weakest "non" boosted h/c in the title
i was kidding about the 900 hp thing, was just trying to get in the sprit of the post
i saw all the high h/p dyno stuff people were reporting, thought i would be there, although some of their 1/4 mile times dont match their power outputs, lol
playing around on the street, i have pulled away from a couple cars that dyno'ed 100 hp more than mine-i used the dyno for a safe tune, wasnt real concerned about hp #'s, its to hard to look at all the gauges on the street and dodge trees also, lol
Sept 19th, track rental, i'll see what it does in the real world
so erase my post if it doesnt belong here in the n/a h/c section
i didnt see where it said who has the weakest "non" boosted h/c in the title
i was kidding about the 900 hp thing, was just trying to get in the sprit of the post
i saw all the high h/p dyno stuff people were reporting, thought i would be there, although some of their 1/4 mile times dont match their power outputs, lol
playing around on the street, i have pulled away from a couple cars that dyno'ed 100 hp more than mine-i used the dyno for a safe tune, wasnt real concerned about hp #'s, its to hard to look at all the gauges on the street and dodge trees also, lol
Sept 19th, track rental, i'll see what it does in the real world
so erase my post if it doesnt belong here in the n/a h/c section
09-12-2008, 11:02 AM
#113
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South FL
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are right on that one. Some people go to inflated dyno's and think they really have the power. Every Dyno is different. All can be "tweaked" by the owner.
I love the people that are dyno'ing mid 400's with cam only set-ups.
Gotta take it to the track to know for sure. A lot of posters on this thread probably have numbers closer to the "actual" power output, or slightly lower due to the dynamometer their car was tuned on (assuming engine is ok). I know I was on a stingy dyno, and I have to believe others were as well.
Who cares if you have a dyno sheet that shows 450+RWHP if your car gets beat by low 400 RWHP cars. Right?
I love the people that are dyno'ing mid 400's with cam only set-ups.
Gotta take it to the track to know for sure. A lot of posters on this thread probably have numbers closer to the "actual" power output, or slightly lower due to the dynamometer their car was tuned on (assuming engine is ok). I know I was on a stingy dyno, and I have to believe others were as well.
Who cares if you have a dyno sheet that shows 450+RWHP if your car gets beat by low 400 RWHP cars. Right?
09-30-2008, 01:13 AM
#115
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PewterScreaminMach...hey man. I dynoed 399rwhp and 372rwtq. so we r pretty close, although I do have my stock rear end. do u have a dyno graph by chance. so I can see how our curves compare. because I don't know what kind of cam I have...insane, I know. the guy I bought it from was not bright. here is mine...
Last edited by badazz99ta; 09-30-2008 at 01:24 AM.
09-30-2008, 09:47 AM
#116
ok, i made it to the track to see how my dyno #'s (which i thought should have been higher)matched up with real world times
best pass was 11.1, had a glich in 1st gear, but the mph was 126
the converter wasnt hitting the stall, only 2200 instead of 3000, so i was a little lazy out of the hole-i run an old school switch/pitch turbo 400, 13" comverter, so im sure i was in 10 sec territory with a converter setup for the car, but i was still running a cons. tune up also, in a big box car, 69 chevelle
with my car weight, mph, the speed calculator says it should run 10.6, have close to 600 hp, so allowing for driveline loss, i guess the dyno was close
interesting thing, the dyno said 126 mph wheel speed at 6200, which is what i had
one thing i learned, these $121 gm lifters will go 7000 rpm, got a little lazy one shift, lol
supercharger cam, afr heads, 3" exhaust would really pick up some power, but untill the gov. gets off their azzes and fixes the economy, im sittin still, already lost enough to buy 2 new vettes, lol
best pass was 11.1, had a glich in 1st gear, but the mph was 126
the converter wasnt hitting the stall, only 2200 instead of 3000, so i was a little lazy out of the hole-i run an old school switch/pitch turbo 400, 13" comverter, so im sure i was in 10 sec territory with a converter setup for the car, but i was still running a cons. tune up also, in a big box car, 69 chevelle
with my car weight, mph, the speed calculator says it should run 10.6, have close to 600 hp, so allowing for driveline loss, i guess the dyno was close
interesting thing, the dyno said 126 mph wheel speed at 6200, which is what i had
one thing i learned, these $121 gm lifters will go 7000 rpm, got a little lazy one shift, lol
supercharger cam, afr heads, 3" exhaust would really pick up some power, but untill the gov. gets off their azzes and fixes the economy, im sittin still, already lost enough to buy 2 new vettes, lol
10-01-2008, 02:26 AM
#118
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
98 short block rebuilt
fly cut pistons
stock mls gasket
patriot stage 2 ls1 heads (2.02/1.57) unmilled
tsp ms3 (237/242 .605/.610 112lsa)
stock lifters
stock rockers
comp pushrods
ls2 timing chain
ls6 intake
ported tb
stock maf
lid
pacesetter lts
custom true duals with moroso spiral flows
rebuilt 4l60e
transgo shift kit
fuddle 4400 stall
trans cooler
4.10 gear w/ girdle
walbro 255
lucas 42# injectors
new fuel filter
msd wires
ngk tr6 gapped .035
368hp/317tq
fly cut pistons
stock mls gasket
patriot stage 2 ls1 heads (2.02/1.57) unmilled
tsp ms3 (237/242 .605/.610 112lsa)
stock lifters
stock rockers
comp pushrods
ls2 timing chain
ls6 intake
ported tb
stock maf
lid
pacesetter lts
custom true duals with moroso spiral flows
rebuilt 4l60e
transgo shift kit
fuddle 4400 stall
trans cooler
4.10 gear w/ girdle
walbro 255
lucas 42# injectors
new fuel filter
msd wires
ngk tr6 gapped .035
368hp/317tq
****, those are the whackest numbers I have ever seen with those, Nice mods
11-12-2009, 01:21 AM
#119
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ashland, Ky
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
394/341 on a Dyno Jet. Livernois stage 2 heads, Futral custom cam, Fast 90.
1/8th mile ET/MPH in sig. Good enough to trap 11.20 @ 122mph in the 1/4 when I was still testing and that was when the car was running 7.30's @ 92. LOL Should be good for high 10's at 127 at least, not bad I think.
1/8th mile ET/MPH in sig. Good enough to trap 11.20 @ 122mph in the 1/4 when I was still testing and that was when the car was running 7.30's @ 92. LOL Should be good for high 10's at 127 at least, not bad I think.
11-15-2009, 07:50 PM
#120
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gateway International Raceway
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
394/341 on a Dyno Jet. Livernois stage 2 heads, Futral custom cam, Fast 90.
1/8th mile ET/MPH in sig. Good enough to trap 11.20 @ 122mph in the 1/4 when I was still testing and that was when the car was running 7.30's @ 92. LOL Should be good for high 10's at 127 at least, not bad I think.
1/8th mile ET/MPH in sig. Good enough to trap 11.20 @ 122mph in the 1/4 when I was still testing and that was when the car was running 7.30's @ 92. LOL Should be good for high 10's at 127 at least, not bad I think.