Why the ms3 is no good for the street!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
all you people complaining about the ms3 being a bad street car cam because its "too big" dont have any experience with them and are just hating for no reason...
stock 241 heads, stock 3.42 10 bolt, stock ls6 intake manifold. ms3 on 112 lsa, hooker long tubes, ORY, texas speed rumbler and ported TB...ram HD clutch

411.5 rwhp, 381rwtq.
315rwtq by 2800rpms...
360rwhp by 4900rpms.....
and heres my dyno sheet from when I was just ported TB, and full exhaust. 351rwhp, 355rwtq.....

so wait, am I seeing this correctly??? Look and learn MS3 haters. Look at my dyno sheets. Stock cam vs MS3. My hp/tq cross a little over 5200rpms and look at the MS3....HP/tq cross at 5300rpms. The difference from the stock cam crossing at 5200rpms is 350rwtq/rwhp and the MS3 at 5300rpms is 375rwtq/rwhp....now figure that out.
3500rpms....340rwtq for bolt on car, 360rwtq for MS3 car. 240rwtq for bolt on car, 240rwtq for MS3.
also, at 2800rpms, BOTH cams have the same amount of HP and TQ. 315rwtq and about 170rwhp. Now what? The MS3 is too big and has no down low power??? well from what Im seeing with both cam's in my car....the down low power is the same with any bolt on stock cam car and the MS3 just pulls like a rapped ape up top......
The ms3 gains tq everywhere over a stock cam/ full bolt on car and HP is nearly the same until 4800rpms+. So, my question is this...
if you can DD a full bolt on car, why cant you DD a MS3 car when the power is nearly the same down low???
Last edited by kidcamaro98; Aug 16, 2009 at 07:45 AM.
But, 90% of the people who dont see the track very much would guaranteed rather have a smaller cam with more power down low and would like it more than the ms3 side of things. all tunes equal. Drive a smaller cam, the down low power makes it clear the difference between the small and big cams...
btw.. im the orginal poster so hate all you want. haha
That being said, yes...low-end power is more ideal for DD, and smaller 22x cams offer this type of power and will have better characteristics for your 4th gear 50-70mph highway pulls in and out of traffic. Fortunately, these cars (LS1 powered vehicles) already have good characteristics for sissy/daily driving. There is no need to mod the car at all if you want a good DD car. So let's stop talking about droppin' heads and cams in 'DD' cars, with the goal of making the car "more" drivable. It's as drivable as it can get from the factory. So modding is not really there to make it 'more drivable' for the stop and go. Get real, we mod the **** out of these cars to do ONE thing. Go fast. So in my opinion, you'll lose drivability at some level for ANY cam swap change significant enough to add some good HP/Tq levels. My point, yes, the MS3 will sacrifice low-end, stop-and-go traffic power for the good stuff up top. BUT, if your complaining about or contemplating over whether or not to have the MS3 because of this 'flaw', then you shouldn't mod the motor in the first place. Leave it alone if you want a fast car that can drive good. Put some bolt-ons in place and a little 100 shot for your speed fix.
By the way Ragen, I'm not directing this post to you at all. This is a "general" dispersion of common sense that I hope all in this thread feels. Everyone should stop arguing at this point. It's not worth name calling. Nothing is.
BTW-I am probably in that 10% that could DD a damn race car, but that's me. lol






