thetugboat
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thetugboat
wheres that dyno you were gonna post up of your car????
please give me some faith you have any credibility cause its coming off as you have none.
post up this magical 330rwhp dyno on your stock car tuned. not that im doubting that, but your quick to post others dyno sheets... posts yours
please give me some faith you have any credibility cause its coming off as you have none.
#4
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wont BS in this thread at all.. even though he will try too.
I just want to see if all this talk coming from has ANY credibility.
#6
So, you are saying that his car doesn't dyno 330rwhp as it sits now? Why would you even doubt it? I mean, you've gone from bitching at him about v-ram intake tuned, and now re-iterating a call out about his recent numbers?
Seriously, WTF man. YOu have a hard on for this guy or did you just break a nail replying in that thread?
#7
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didnt take anything out of context...
everyone can read the thread here https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...mustang-2.html
Im just raising the BS flag on everything
everyone can read the thread here https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...mustang-2.html
Im just raising the BS flag on everything
Last edited by CraZee ZO6; 02-25-2009 at 02:35 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have WAYYY too much time on your hands and frankly, need to grow up. you took his posts WAY out of context and were the ONLY ONE posting in there with your mindset.
So, you are saying that his car doesn't dyno 330rwhp as it sits now? Why would you even doubt it? I mean, you've gone from bitching at him about v-ram intake tuned, and now re-iterating a call out about his recent numbers?
Seriously, WTF man. YOu have a hard on for this guy or did you just break a nail replying in that thread?
So, you are saying that his car doesn't dyno 330rwhp as it sits now? Why would you even doubt it? I mean, you've gone from bitching at him about v-ram intake tuned, and now re-iterating a call out about his recent numbers?
Seriously, WTF man. YOu have a hard on for this guy or did you just break a nail replying in that thread?
#10
I didnt take anything out of context...
everyone can read the thread here https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...mustang-2.html
Im just raising the BS flag on everything
everyone can read the thread here https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...mustang-2.html
Im just raising the BS flag on everything
OK..HERE:
TUGBOAT: "It came with 361 to the crank haha...not quite the story any more. Only a CAI away from being rated at what the gxp's are."
---going off of 330rwhp, he's correct. And NO WHERE did he state dyno numbers in his FIRST post about his ratings. He simply said 'rated at'. That could be TS, ET, FWHP, or RWHP. DId you even bother to ask him to clarify? NO, you jumped his ****.
YOU: "to equal a ls3 is more than a intake buddy LOL
they are making like 440crank hp stock"
Funny, I didn't know the LS3 in the GXPs were rated at 440HP stock. Looks like YOU were the one in the WRONG.
TUGBOATS RESPONSE: "First, I'm right at 330whp...So with the Vararam (claiming .3-.5 tenth gains in the 1/4) and me already having ET's as good as the mags have gotten with the GXP's I figure the Vararam will make up for the extra tenths that a good driver will pull out of a stock GXP. Plus there's more left on the table on my tune after the exhaust so I'm pretty sure I could see low low low 360s, most likely 350s after the retune for the Vararam and exhaust. By the way I've kindly attatched a GXP M6 dyno...LS3's in GXP's were rated at 415 crank, not your magical 440 you pulled out of thin air."
Again, you are the one taking it all out of context and were COMPLETELY WRONG In your statements. Instead of shutting up and letting it go, you had to push an issue that you had no strong point on to begin with.
Anything Else?
You were wrong. Get some Lee Press Ons and let it go already. FOCK.
#11
i'm in my hometown and the dyno sheet is at my college place with beer spilled on it cause i dont really care about those numbers.......i'm going to the RPM dyno day on march 7th so you'll have to wait till then or i'll post my stained one this weekend when i go back to school...
#12
And unless I do a dyno pull in a ******* NASA wind tunnel the vararam wont show **** for improved numbers cause its a ram air intake. So obviously i was talking about et/street performance "rating" with my comment.
#15
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'm in my hometown and the dyno sheet is at my college place with beer spilled on it cause i dont really care about those numbers.......i'm going to the RPM dyno day on march 7th so you'll have to wait till then or i'll post my stained one this weekend when i go back to school...
have fun posting up others people's dyno sheets.
and others guys talking out of their *** I never doubted his 330 out of his motor with his mods... I just doubted HIM. His #, his dyno run are all in his head.
maybe he can post his 13.0 et timeslip.. lol probably not as well.
lock it up this one is done. point proved.
phoney
Last edited by CraZee ZO6; 02-25-2009 at 05:59 PM.
#16
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they are rated at 415.
they make 370-380rwhp STOCK.. that is about 440hp crank. Yes they are underrated.
Im FAR from wrong... your just a idiot.. have fun playing with your friend. I did my job here, anyone else can see how dumb both of you are.
#17
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im keeping this real short cause your another dumbass...
they are rated at 415.
they make 370-380rwhp STOCK.. that is about 440hp crank. Yes they are underrated.
Im FAR from wrong... your just a idiot.. have fun playing with your friend. I did my job here, anyone else can see how dumb both of you are.
they are rated at 415.
they make 370-380rwhp STOCK.. that is about 440hp crank. Yes they are underrated.
Im FAR from wrong... your just a idiot.. have fun playing with your friend. I did my job here, anyone else can see how dumb both of you are.
here, lets try this. What do you drive?
#18
haha I KNEW it.
have fun posting up others people's dyno sheets.
and others guys talking out of their *** I never doubted his 330 out of his motor with his mods... I just doubted HIM. His #, his dyno run are all in his head.
maybe he can post his 13.0 et timeslip.. lol probably not as well.
lock it up this one is done. point proved.
phoney
have fun posting up others people's dyno sheets.
and others guys talking out of their *** I never doubted his 330 out of his motor with his mods... I just doubted HIM. His #, his dyno run are all in his head.
maybe he can post his 13.0 et timeslip.. lol probably not as well.
lock it up this one is done. point proved.
phoney
Wow...you're a brainiac.
Im keeping this real short cause your another dumbass...
they are rated at 415.
they make 370-380rwhp STOCK.. that is about 440hp crank. Yes they are underrated.
Im FAR from wrong... your just a idiot.. have fun playing with your friend. I did my job here, anyone else can see how dumb both of you are.
they are rated at 415.
they make 370-380rwhp STOCK.. that is about 440hp crank. Yes they are underrated.
Im FAR from wrong... your just a idiot.. have fun playing with your friend. I did my job here, anyone else can see how dumb both of you are.
In fact, didn' the M6 dyno sheet he post have ~367?.....WhTF EVER questioned that you moron? He NEVER STATED HE WOULD DYNO THAT NUMBER........DO YOU COMPREHEND???...
Basically...I'll point it simply.............
YOU ASSUME, YOU WRONG,
YOU CRIED LIKE A BABY,
YOU WOULDNT" ADMIT INCORRECTION ON YOUR BEHALF,
THREAD LOCKED,
YOU START NEW THREAD,
YOU GET PROVED WRONG AGAIN...............all based off of you not wanting to admit you assumed and misinterpreted what he said. ANd now, you're starting a can of woop *** as NO ONE HERE agrees with you and are pointing out your grade school ignorance.
STFU. Let me dig you a ditch so you can cry me a river.
#19
#20
I forgot to comment directly on this part.............................so your job was to make a senseless call out on something you assumed about and were wrong in teh first place, just to get proven wrong again? If that'st he case, then Congrats.
Secondly, 'anyone else can see', HOWEVER, JUST LIKE THE LINK YOU posted, NO ONE agrees with YOU!. It appears to be quite the opposite.
Secondly, 'anyone else can see', HOWEVER, JUST LIKE THE LINK YOU posted, NO ONE agrees with YOU!. It appears to be quite the opposite.