Dyno Guesses & Bench Racing Forum Horsepower Estimates | Racing Scenarios

s2000 vs. lt1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2010, 02:26 AM
  #41  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Considering Toyota Rav4s run high 14s nowadays, high 13s definitely isn't what it used to be. Race a '11 V6 Mustang and a '97 Z28/TA, and you would probably be unpleasantly-surprised.
Old 06-22-2010, 02:47 AM
  #42  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Endersshadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Considering Toyota Rav4s run high 14s nowadays, high 13s definitely isn't what it used to be. Race a '11 V6 Mustang and a '97 Z28/TA, and you would probably be unpleasantly-surprised.
So what you're saying is that the 17 year old tech in the LT1 has FINALLY been surpassed by some modern V6's? Good job. Also...what is surprising about a 300+ hp car beating a 250 hp car? Nothing. What was your point again?
Old 06-22-2010, 03:36 AM
  #43  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Since when are LT1s 250hp? I don't even believe for a second that the LT1 F-bodies were 275/285hp when the Corvette was 300hp. The LT1 was a great motor (Optispark aside) for its day, and I am in no way trying to discredit it... but to downplay one motor (in a car built for a COMPLETELY different reason) because it only propels a car to the same speed as an older car is dumb. Sorry, there's just no other way to put it. Calling a 2000 S2000 "weak" because it runs the same times as a '93 Trans Am is just flat out dumb.
Old 06-22-2010, 10:31 AM
  #44  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
sciff5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Like I said.. narrow minded
Old 06-22-2010, 10:33 AM
  #45  
On The Tree
 
CaptainDirtymax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the LT1 Vette's had better flowing exhaust manifolds than the F-body's. oh and btw, the Optispark isn't as bad as everyone makes it out to be. yes, it doesn't like water, and the placement of it right below the waterpump probably wasn't the smartest idea. but they do last. i'm at almost 190k miles on my factory Opti, still running strong.
Old 06-22-2010, 12:56 PM
  #46  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The one on my mom's old '94 Vette blew at ~110k miles. And then her transmission went at 116k IIRC.
Old 06-23-2010, 11:16 PM
  #47  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Back in the day I saw plenty of LT1s(Fbodies) run 13s even autos. Many are ragged out and driven by kids that don't know how to drive now. Hell my best time time in a six speed LT1 Vette is 13.6. I would love a 96 Vette six speed-12s stock with an LT4
Old 06-24-2010, 12:38 AM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
I8ASaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N. Richland Hills
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Geez, I have never considered an S2000 a race: track, dig, roll, whatever - I guess when they were 3-4 cars back when I was stock I just never thought of that as competition. Maybe I'm just lolh4x driver of the century.
Old 06-24-2010, 12:38 AM
  #49  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
Back in the day I saw plenty of LT1s(Fbodies) run 13s even autos. Many are ragged out and driven by kids that don't know how to drive now. Hell my best time time in a six speed LT1 Vette is 13.6. I would love a 96 Vette six speed-12s stock with an LT4
That has a great chance of being my next car... Admiral Blue on red/black. When my mom had her automatic '94 Vette when I was in high school, a buddy of mine had an identical '95. He ran a 13.6@99mph at the beginning of summer, so I would think maybe a 13.4@101mph on a great day. There were very few LT1s quicker than that.
Old 06-27-2010, 12:41 AM
  #50  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
BLK85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When is the race going to happen?
Old 06-27-2010, 01:20 AM
  #51  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
WhitePhoenix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OP is not stock for those of you saying it's a drivers race stock for stock etc. . He said he has long tube headers and ORY. I'll give the advantage to the lt1.
Old 06-27-2010, 03:40 AM
  #52  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
I8ASaleen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N. Richland Hills
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Even if he was I still say it's a slaughter, now it definitely will be.
Old 06-27-2010, 04:47 AM
  #53  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by I8ASaleen
Even if he was I still say it's a slaughter, now it definitely will be.
You can't say it's a slaughter just because of the people that you have raced. Numbers don't lie, and the numbers says it should be VERY close. To say otherwise is ignorance.
Old 06-27-2010, 04:59 AM
  #54  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
meine96ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My buddy has a S2k and I think they pull really nice nice for the type of car they were made to be..
Now, I think it would come down to your set up and how good you can launch.. But, from a roll you should be able to pull on him..
Old 06-27-2010, 05:40 AM
  #55  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Considering Toyota Rav4s run high 14s nowadays, high 13s definitely isn't what it used to be. Race a '11 V6 Mustang and a '97 Z28/TA, and you would probably be unpleasantly-surprised.
Really anything other than low 13s is pretty slow now adays. 2011-2015 is going to make it even more slow IMHO.
Old 06-27-2010, 09:46 AM
  #56  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
blk/slvr02ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Port Saint Lucie,Florida
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was @ my local track Wed. night and watched a S2000 run 8.46@178 that was 1 sick little car.



Quick Reply: s2000 vs. lt1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM.