chadman

just waiting for the all the parts to get here , cant wait to get everything in and see how she runs !2000 ws6 m6 has 410 rear in it already

heres the list
5.3 prc stage 2 heads w.675 springs
ms3 cam
fast 102 intake and tb
fast billet fuel rails
36lb injectors
ported oil pump
adjustable double roller timing set
ls7 lifters
17/8 tsp headers and ory

2slow2flurry-ous

iTrader: (13)

is it a six speed or auto?...I'll assume m6 because you didn't say anything about a stall...

-You want the short end of it? It should roll out pretty hard because you got a nice list of mods right there but I really don't like THAT cam. The gears should help it out but you have to spin the **** outta that cam to make power, which kinda sucks to me for a street car. Those 5.3 heads might help with the midrange, I know those are some great heads for a ls1. Run it at the track and get back to us!

chadman

car is a m6 i forgot to mention that i soon as i get some numbers ill get them on here

cookba

iTrader: (10)

hope you plan on getting a new rear!

chadman

tell me about it , but a good problem to have as far as i see it ......a 9" will be going in it when funds permit

SOMSS

iTrader: (1)

Call Comp, they will design (free) a cam for your specific needs that will match your heads.
Too much intake for a 346ci engine. FAST 90/90 would be better. You don't need the high flow fuel rails, the stock ones work just fine up to about 700hp. I would go with 42lb injectors, LS2 timing chain and definitely change those stock push rods for some Comp Cams chro-moly push rods.

HWI

iTrader: (2)

You referring to the FAST 102? Tony Mamo already proved this a fallacy, it is not too big for a stock cubed motor.

chadman

yes im using chro-moly pushrods ...cant use stock rails with the 102 and a 90 is not easy to come by these days i tried to get one used not so easy , so what ive read the 102 will be fine

LS6427

iTrader: (2)

Get this FAST 90 intake and TB

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FAST-...Q5fAccessories

.

mike c.

iTrader: (1)

Chadman-Why a 9''? It robs more power and the chance you will break a 12 bolt is slim. I have hundreds of n/a low 1.4 60's and 1.3's on the hose pulling wheelies and the moser 12bolt is still in there going strong after eight years of hell in a 3,700lbs car.

chadman

Get this FAST 90 intake and TB

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FAST-...Q5fAccessories

1200 for a used setup you got to be f-ing kidding me!

chadman

mike c . the rear upgrade will be down the road 9" or a 12 bolt will suit me fine ...when the time comes or should i say when the $$ comes ill look into it but thanks for your input

wannabfast

iTrader: (3)

IMO i would say you are in the ball park for 450. Just my .02

180ls1

iTrader: (4)

you guys are crazy telling him that is too much intake for a stock engine. Yes that setup will make the 450 mark with ease and then some. Just make sure you get a quality tune for it and run a 4" cutout.

MikeWS6

I was just reading that thread. Very surprised.

SOMbitch

iTrader: (8)

Those heads are an ok bang for the buck but for a few more c-notes there are much better choices. I picked up 19/19 with the only change being TFS as cast 220's...

BrntWS6

iTrader: (7)

^^more than a few. I thought the price difference was well over $500. 20 horse is a good increase but your definately paying for it.

SOMbitch

iTrader: (8)

^^^now that I am running more cubes I sure they picked up more than20/20....

BrntWS6

iTrader: (7)

^ People buying these heads are on a budget and probably aren't going big cubes. I'm sure the 220's are great heads, but can't fairly be compared to the 5.3's. It's a totally different price bracket.

Midnight02

iTrader: (8)

You're definitely in the neighborhood of getting to 450 rwhp. I have a similar setup and ended up at 440 rwhp on a N2O tune.