Dyno Guesses & Bench Racing Forum Horsepower Estimates | Racing Scenarios
View Poll Results: READ THREAD BEFORE VOTING Which is quicker? Auto-swapped C5 Z06 vs Manual C5 Z06
Auto with converter
93.65%
Manual
6.35%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Which of these cars is quicker? Auto swap vs Manual

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2011, 10:13 PM
  #21  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BuckaroooZ28
Manuel!

Manuel????
Are you talking about the Hispanic guy driving the Automatic?
Old 01-01-2013, 03:05 AM
  #22  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (36)
 
98TADRIVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jerzy
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soundengineer
Manuel????
Are you talking about the Hispanic guy driving the Automatic?
lol hispanic or american, advantage-> automatic w/ stall
Old 01-01-2013, 03:33 AM
  #23  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
Dig = Auto
Roll = Manual

not if you have the right stall in your car
if you have a small stall or a stock stall... yes... the M6 will win every time assuming the rest of the car is identical in power curve and weight

however... I have no problems beating manual transmission cars....
Proper stall to put me in the powerband immediately, plus torque multiplication = faster than an M6....

now... if we get into the discussion of a clutchless Manual.. like a liberty that has been faceplated....the liberty is going to win most of the time if its set up properly.
Old 01-01-2013, 04:55 PM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

I say that because the M6 guys always trap higher at the track, and well numbers don't lie. However, when i say roll I usually mean a 4k hit and up, which takes away a lot of the stall's advantage.
Old 01-01-2013, 05:01 PM
  #25  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
I say that because the M6 guys always trap higher at the track, and well numbers don't lie. However, when i say roll I usually mean a 4k hit and up, which takes away a lot of the stall's advantage.
I dont know what the hell you are talking about there (in red)
4k and up and you are toast vs me....
4800~5000 stall will eat your *** alive

and m6 guys dont trap any higher MPH than an auto guy does when the power out of the rear is the same.
power out of the engine is the same, of course the m6 will trap higher MPH... more parasitic loss thru the auto, but theres also a better ET thru an auto because you put more average torque over time thru the rearend.
Old 01-01-2013, 05:05 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
silverz28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st.louis
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by black00ssFL
80e is only like 30-50lbs heaver once you take that stock converter out of there. And I'd think a 4400 stall and 4.30's would overcome that steep 1st gear.
The 4l60e 134lbs
The 4l80e 184lbs

The normal 9.5 in 60e converter 33lbs
The normal stall for 80e? not sure but I do think they are also 5-10lbs heavier even at the same 9.5 rating?? I need someone to weigh a 80e converter

So 50lbs minimun, possibly 60-65lbs?

I have yet to weigh a T56 but I think the t56 (without clutch, clutch pedal,) might be a few lbs lighter then a 60e, guessing 15-20
Old 01-01-2013, 05:20 PM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,960
Received 452 Likes on 355 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soundengineer
I went from 11.7@123 in my t56
to an 11.2@122 with my TCI 6x and yank py3600 made as a 4800 stall.

no other mods done inbetween the 2 runs...
both done in similar weather...
both done on a Tuesday evening, one week apart.

both on a 245/55/16 MR street radial.


I will say.... auto is faster
my car is perfect proof
No way there is that much difference. All that proved is your not very good with a stick.

If both cars has comparable mods there is not alot of difference.
examples
stall = light weight/drag clutch
shift kit = faceplated
each need to be geared independently for best results.

The difference is the manual car if it's a f-body will need a rear. All stick cars will need a little more work on the set-up for ultimate performance.

Auto has it's advantages in consistency.
Old 01-01-2013, 05:30 PM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have never personally seen someone launch as hard in an M6 fbody as my stalled auto.. Not even the "race cars" that I have seen run (I'm talking even some what similar set ups).. I cut 1.50.152s barely spinning with a nitrous tune 2200+DA on a budget H/C setup that was 100% a full weight street car (small cam, 317s hand ported/etc)..

You would be hard pressed to find even 1 guy out of 100 that could cut a quicker 60' than that. I'm expecting low-mid 1.4Xs on the new setup, still nothing special. Consistency isn't all thy have.
You can say it is easier/harder for either one... That is irrelevant while racing. Fact the stalled auto 99.999% of the time will 60' harder.
Old 01-01-2013, 05:33 PM
  #29  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
No way there is that much difference. All that proved is your not very good with a stick.

If both cars has comparable mods there is not alot of difference.
examples
stall = light weight/drag clutch
shift kit = faceplated

The difference is the manual car if it's a f-body will need a rear. All stick cars will need a little more work on the set-up for ultimate performance.

Auto has it's advantages in consistency.

many cars will routinely see .4 to .5 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile just from going from stock Manual to Auto transmission with a properly sized stall

a change in gearing advantage, plus the ability to transfer more torque to the ground over a longer period of time, will always net you a faster ET

go from a 3.42 to a 4.11 and tell me you dont see a good drop in your overall ET, then add the benefits of a Stall converter and tell me you dont see more drop in ET...


T56 2.66 1.78 1.30 1.00 0.74 0.50

total gear with a 3.42
T56 9.10 6.09 4.45 3.42 2.53 1.71

total gear with a 4.11
T56 10.93 7.32 5.34 4.11 3.04 2.06



TCI 6x 2.97 2.23 1.57 1.18 1.00 0.75

total gear ratio with a 3.42
TCI 6x 10.16 7.63 5.37 4.04 3.42 2.57




Distinct gear advantge with my TCI 6x that is close to changing from a 3.42 up to a 4.11
plus the mechanical advantage of adding a 4800 stall

half a second increase is very easily achieved
Old 01-01-2013, 05:33 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
No way there is that much difference. All that proved is your not very good with a stick.

If both cars has comparable mods there is not alot of difference.
examples
stall = light weight/drag clutch
shift kit = faceplated
each need to be geared independently for best results.

The difference is the manual car if it's a f-body will need a rear. All stick cars will need a little more work on the set-up for ultimate performance.

Auto has it's advantages in consistency.
You don't need a shift kit to cut a killer 60' in an average setup.
Old 01-01-2013, 08:32 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
02SOMWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wallkill ,NY
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
I have never personally seen someone launch as hard in an M6 fbody as my stalled auto.. Not even the "race cars" that I have seen run (I'm talking even some what similar set ups).. I cut 1.50.152s barely spinning with a nitrous tune 2200+DA on a budget H/C setup that was 100% a full weight street car (small cam, 317s hand ported/etc)..

You would be hard pressed to find even 1 guy out of 100 that could cut a quicker 60' than that. I'm expecting low-mid 1.4Xs on the new setup, still nothing special. Consistency isn't all thy have.
You can say it is easier/harder for either one... That is irrelevant while racing. Fact the stalled auto 99.999% of the time will 60' harder.
the first run is a 1.38 60ft

Old 01-01-2013, 08:37 PM
  #32  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
02SOMWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wallkill ,NY
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm a stick guy but my vote for this thread would go to the auto. In the back of my mind I'm pretty sure my car would be quicker auto but I could never change it. I have too much fun banging the gears and driving along and being able to dump the clutch and lay the car sideways at 50mph+
Old 01-01-2013, 08:57 PM
  #33  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02SOMWS6
I'm a stick guy but my vote for this thread would go to the auto. In the back of my mind I'm pretty sure my car would be quicker auto but I could never change it. I have too much fun banging the gears and driving along and being able to dump the clutch and lay the car sideways at 50mph+
dont be a wussy....
get a big stall and accomplish the same thing..
Old 01-01-2013, 09:15 PM
  #34  
FormerVendor
 
James@ShorTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dyno Tuning in KY
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not everyone is capable of driving a stickshift to its abilities. 9/10 times the auto will be faster... I know of a few drivers that would make all your jaws drop behind the 6spd!
Old 01-01-2013, 09:44 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02SOMWS6
the first run is a 1.38 60ft
Originally Posted by 02SOMWS6
I'm a stick guy but my vote for this thread would go to the auto. In the back of my mind I'm pretty sure my car would be quicker auto but I could never change it. I have too much fun banging the gears and driving along and being able to dump the clutch and lay the car sideways at 50mph+
You are in the 1% IMO.. Few and far between people can make an M6 perform like that.
Old 01-02-2013, 02:13 PM
  #36  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
02SOMWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wallkill ,NY
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by James@ShorTuning
Not everyone is capable of driving a stickshift to its abilities. 9/10 times the auto will be faster... I know of a few drivers that would make all your jaws drop behind the 6spd!
I make my own jaw drop...LOL
Old 01-03-2013, 05:37 PM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,960
Received 452 Likes on 355 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soundengineer
many cars will routinely see .4 to .5 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile just from going from stock Manual to Auto transmission with a properly sized stall

a change in gearing advantage, plus the ability to transfer more torque to the ground over a longer period of time, will always net you a faster ET

go from a 3.42 to a 4.11 and tell me you dont see a good drop in your overall ET, then add the benefits of a Stall converter and tell me you dont see more drop in ET...


T56 2.66 1.78 1.30 1.00 0.74 0.50

total gear with a 3.42
T56 9.10 6.09 4.45 3.42 2.53 1.71

total gear with a 4.11
T56 10.93 7.32 5.34 4.11 3.04 2.06



TCI 6x 2.97 2.23 1.57 1.18 1.00 0.75

total gear ratio with a 3.42
TCI 6x 10.16 7.63 5.37 4.04 3.42 2.57




Distinct gear advantge with my TCI 6x that is close to changing from a 3.42 up to a 4.11
plus the mechanical advantage of adding a 4800 stall

half a second increase is very easily achieved
I've went from 3.42 to a 4.11 before. I saw just over a tenth and +1mph. No huge advantage, I ended up taking some gear out(went to 3.90's) and went faster. I actually would'nt mind trying a 3.73. Any benefit a auto has is in the first 330'. At some point in drag racing it seems cars go back to a standard type trans, be it a Linco(?) or whatever else is availible.
Originally Posted by lemons12
You don't need a shift kit to cut a killer 60' in an average setup.
Not for 60'...to keep it alive.
Old 01-21-2013, 08:53 AM
  #38  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Roarin_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 4,567
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

I voted auto, I have yet to see an M6 Fbod with 313rwhp hit lower than 12.3 Can imagine it would be even better with a vette with it's lighter weight.



Quick Reply: Which of these cars is quicker? Auto swap vs Manual



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 AM.