Speed density or Mass air flow
has anyone tried the new Abaco style mass air flow sensor. they are digital so i figure they can pick up air better.
please give my oyu opinions. let me know what you all think. i am hoping for 1000 plus on the dyno. but like 650-850 on the street with the change of boost.
thanks
also how much does elevation matter? like if i get tuned at 500ft elevation. and i live at 1500ft elevation. how does that change my tune.
also how much does elevation matter? like if i get tuned at 500ft elevation. and i live at 1500ft elevation. how does that change my tune.
As far as MAF vs. SD here's the basics:
The computers in these cars are hard coded to a maximum MAF airflow. Once you exceed that, the PCM can't tell what the actual airflow is. You then tweak the PE table until you get the fueling where you want it, meaning that your WOT fueling is based solely on RPM. It does not matter what MAF you put on the car your maximum measured airflow is the same (512 g/sec if I recall correctly).
With a 2 or 3 bar tune you're fueling on a calculated airflow from manifold pressure, temperature, etc... not RPM. You're only limited by the MAP sensor you are using, 2 bar or 3.
Trending Topics
Yep so true. I dyno 760 in sanantino in Aug on 14 psi. and 813 in Ga in novmember no change in the tune no cool down. I think it was 80 degrees in sa that day and 67 degrees in GA. Speed density is godly
IMHO. The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Again, that's Ford. Their systems are not VE/MAF hybrids like ours; it's their only option on the OEM hardware that I know of... AFAIK they have no underlying VE for air mass estimation, just the MAF.






