My Procharged TA is done.
05-23-2009, 11:27 PM
#23
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am actually surprised myself. The dyno is a accurate. There have been a lot of cars on it. My buddy who is good at tuning and did my whole car has done a bunch of vehicles on it and mine is a freak. He is amazed himself. I have 70k on the motor. When it was apart to put the rod bolts were in. The motor looks like brand new. Looks like there is hardly any wear on it. Just for fun I think I am going to throw it on another mustang dyno and do it on the same night with the conditions mine were done in.
Last edited by josepy121380; 05-23-2009 at 11:35 PM.
05-24-2009, 01:54 PM
#25
According to the chart rwhp is actually 575 but adjusted with "with WCF" raising it to 610 - a 35 hp difference. What does 'with WCF' mean?
But 575 seems to be high for a P1 too. We don't know what pulley combination either and if it is a six rib or 8 rib or 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 inch intercoolers?
If true HP actually is 610 then on a Dynojet that equates to almost 700 rwhp if there is a true 15-20 percent differential between a Mustang and Dynojet.
I surely wouldn't want to be running that much hp with a stock bottom end and without meth assist to cool the intake charge.
It is a six speed so that might account for some of the difference.
But 575 seems to be high for a P1 too. We don't know what pulley combination either and if it is a six rib or 8 rib or 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 inch intercoolers?
If true HP actually is 610 then on a Dynojet that equates to almost 700 rwhp if there is a true 15-20 percent differential between a Mustang and Dynojet.
I surely wouldn't want to be running that much hp with a stock bottom end and without meth assist to cool the intake charge.
It is a six speed so that might account for some of the difference.
05-25-2009, 11:58 AM
#26
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to the chart rwhp is actually 575 but adjusted with "with WCF" raising it to 610 - a 35 hp difference. What does 'with WCF' mean?
But 575 seems to be high for a P1 too. We don't know what pulley combination either and if it is a six rib or 8 rib or 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 inch intercoolers?
If true HP actually is 610 then on a Dynojet that equates to almost 700 rwhp if there is a true 15-20 percent differential between a Mustang and Dynojet.
I surely wouldn't want to be running that much hp with a stock bottom end and without meth assist to cool the intake charge.
It is a six speed so that might account for some of the difference.
But 575 seems to be high for a P1 too. We don't know what pulley combination either and if it is a six rib or 8 rib or 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 inch intercoolers?
If true HP actually is 610 then on a Dynojet that equates to almost 700 rwhp if there is a true 15-20 percent differential between a Mustang and Dynojet.
I surely wouldn't want to be running that much hp with a stock bottom end and without meth assist to cool the intake charge.
It is a six speed so that might account for some of the difference.
I dont know what else to say.
05-25-2009, 12:04 PM
#27
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Part of the reason why this car is pushing so hard is due to the upgraded fuel system. The procharger systems yield large gains with larger injector and fuel delivery; even with stock heads and intake.
05-25-2009, 12:29 PM
#28
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was over budget on the project and I dont want to be slinging a new motor in it.
06-01-2009, 10:07 PM
#34
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
