Lt1 mainfold!!!!!!
08-24-2010, 10:38 AM
#7
LTx intake!!!
For starters, 1000+ rwhp has been made using a stock casting.
Secondly, a back-to-back test was performed between a heavily modified LT4 intake versus single plane. The LT4 made more torque below 5200, they were dead even 5200-6200, then the single plane made more above 6200 (but only about 15 hp at peak). This was with a large solid-roller that liked being over 6000. On most street set-ups with hydraulic cams, you'll spend most of your time below 6200 rpm.
Mike
For starters, 1000+ rwhp has been made using a stock casting.
Secondly, a back-to-back test was performed between a heavily modified LT4 intake versus single plane. The LT4 made more torque below 5200, they were dead even 5200-6200, then the single plane made more above 6200 (but only about 15 hp at peak). This was with a large solid-roller that liked being over 6000. On most street set-ups with hydraulic cams, you'll spend most of your time below 6200 rpm.
Mike
Trending Topics
08-25-2010, 12:12 PM
#8
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WACO, TX
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes like mike said, I've seen it over and over again! How high are you spinning it? Anything 6500 and under you don't need a single plane. And if you runnin a stock computer you can't go over 7k anyways! So it's all bout the rpm! But if it's worth anything I went with a heavily porter lt4, looking for sum big power with the new build!