80lb injectors = what max WHP range?
12-21-2010, 08:20 PM
#21
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NoCal
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We'll find out next month hopefully. Do a search, theres plenty of info on it. I decided to play the safe route and use a baby tame cam just to allow for nice driveability while not in boost.
12-21-2010, 09:02 PM
#22
Also a big difference in fuel usage between a blower car and a turbo car correct? Heard it many times from people I would trust....
12-21-2010, 09:59 PM
#23
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hinesville, GA
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is an example for 1000 Crank HP and 80% duty cycle. Requirment for N/A and Boost (should work for either turbo or supercharged).
70lbs min for N/A (if you wanted to play it safe 80lbs)
85lbs min for Boost (if you wanted to play it safe 95lbs)
I posted a formula a while back on how to calculate your injector size. If you know the your crank hp. To answer you question 80lbs injector for turbo application is good for about 925 Crank HP at 80% duty cycle.
70lbs min for N/A (if you wanted to play it safe 80lbs)
85lbs min for Boost (if you wanted to play it safe 95lbs)
I posted a formula a while back on how to calculate your injector size. If you know the your crank hp. To answer you question 80lbs injector for turbo application is good for about 925 Crank HP at 80% duty cycle.
Last edited by WS6RED2002TA; 12-21-2010 at 10:04 PM.
12-29-2010, 08:42 PM
#25
12-30-2010, 05:04 PM
#28
9 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cecil County, MD
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure what my car dyno's, but I have 80's at 50psi base pressure. Car went 9.32 @ 152mph at 14psi. Car is 3533lbs. I'd guess that's in 950-975 crank hp range.
12-30-2010, 07:49 PM
#31
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm really impressed by some of the numbers being turning on those injectors. I thought they gave up a lot sooner. Does the increased pressure have any downsides besides a little more wear on the pumps?
I don't know the guy personally but that's one of the funniest questions I've heard online in a while.
Why don't you brag online about what you do in real life?
I don't know the guy personally but that's one of the funniest questions I've heard online in a while.
Why don't you brag online about what you do in real life?
12-30-2010, 09:25 PM
#33
12-31-2010, 04:29 PM
#35
i have run a 58 psi base and ran a 1:1 regulater with 80's.... with that setup i have made 900rwhp on a TT vette with my duty cycle in the mid 90's..... the optimal setup in my opinion would be a 100+lb injector low impedence injector , with a low impedence driver box.... then you can drop your base pressure down to 43.5 psi, and possibly go with a 2:1 regulater
12-31-2010, 09:37 PM
#37
12-31-2010, 11:29 PM
#39
7 Second Club
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i went 8.9@161 at 3700lb with 80's at 80psi on C16.. they are a good injector.
12-31-2010, 11:31 PM
#40
7 Second Club
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have run a 58 psi base and ran a 1:1 regulater with 80's.... with that setup i have made 900rwhp on a TT vette with my duty cycle in the mid 90's..... the optimal setup in my opinion would be a 100+lb injector low impedence injector , with a low impedence driver box.... then you can drop your base pressure down to 43.5 psi, and possibly go with a 2:1 regulater
driver boxes are a thing of the past with anything up to 190lb high Z injectors being so damm good!