MIGHTYMOUSE

iTrader: (59)

thanks for the help guys, id prefer the 1500, i do have room for a rise in iat's if necessary

George at tti is trying to work with me in getting a nice upgrade package together (if possible)

modular turbo: today was wild for me, ill give a ring tomorrow.

Snyper

iTrader: (27)

Whats your current A2W good for? Looking for something good to 20-22psi on my PT88....price?

MIGHTYMOUSE

iTrader: (59)

900 is rated for 900 though it has served me well above that

bluehawk2

iTrader: (74)

What about running a pt2000 in the front bumper using something like the burkhart bumper support?

You wouldnt have to run meth with that if your water pump and lines are big enough.

sound like it is time to do some fab work

stevieturbo

900 rated in what respect though ? I dont get that as a rating system.

It can only be airflow. No mention on cooling ability. The cooling requirements of 2 different 900bhp engines could be very very different.

MIGHTYMOUSE

iTrader: (59)

not trying to jack my set up all up, remember new turbo is not 2000hp, its 13-1400

the rating question has to go to precision, i dunno dude.

stevieturbo

It's the same with intercoolers though. Places give HP ratings which really mean nothing.

A 2.0 turbo making 900bhp is going to have vastly different IAT cooling requirements than a 7.0 turbo. Although actual air quantities may be similar.

bluehawk2

iTrader: (74)

I looked on precisions site and didnt see any info on cfm for their turbos or intercoolers.

I have been looking at this for my car. I know that my turbos will produce 2400 cfm max, so I am looking at cores that will allow for at least 2400 cfm.



just looking at the size of the 2000 vs the 1500......the 2000 isnt much bigger than the 1500 and its only 5.6lbs more weight

900 17 1/8" L x 14 1/4" H x 4 1/2" D 3.0" 1"NPT 17.3 lbs
1500 14 3/8" L x 15 5/8" H x 7 1/4" D 4.0" 1"NPT 16.9 lbs
2000 15 1/8" L x 15 7/8" H x 4 3/4" D 4.0" 1"NPT 22.5 lbs
.
little overkill never hurts