Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

A year ago today I took the stock shortblock record...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2011, 11:40 AM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

You guys are highly motivating me to finish my mustang beater. Tight work...i'm over here on the fence about changing cams,..you ******* aren't even doing that... looks like i'llput the money into the suspension instead.

Thanks for the motivation.
Old 09-25-2011, 01:21 PM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc
ha yeah it is actually funny all the grief given to him over the weight, and the benchracers thinking they could run x.x if they had the car

he sounds jelly and butthurt to me that he would even come into the thread and post something like "not running a tin can"
So because I said my car could run 5.5's if it weighed 2600lbs is innacurate and I'm a bench racer now?

Your telling me that my car that runs 6.60's on a soft, soft *** tune-up, couldn't run 1 sec faster at 1300#'s less race weight?
Old 09-25-2011, 01:46 PM
  #43  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

My ltd went 6.5 at 112 and then we went 5.8 at 120 on the same power last night in the rx7, 2600 vs 3700lbs for an idea.
Old 09-25-2011, 02:05 PM
  #44  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The LTD probably couldn't squeeze out near the 60' that RX7 can though. E.T. for E.T. and MPH for MPH that's only a half second change as your stating.

Just to let everyone know, I am in NO way discounting skinnies accomplishments with the stock shortblock. At all. I've been a big fan of his for a while seeing as I have a stock shortblock also(not for much longer).

What was the LTD's best 60'?
Old 09-25-2011, 04:41 PM
  #45  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
ablakez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by rotary1307cc
ha yeah it is actually funny all the grief given to him over the weight, and the benchracers thinking they could run x.x if they had the car

he sounds jelly and butthurt to me that he would even come into the thread and post something like "not running a tin can"
+1
Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
So because I said my car could run 5.5's if it weighed 2600lbs is innacurate and I'm a bench racer now?

Your telling me that my car that runs 6.60's on a soft, soft *** tune-up, couldn't run 1 sec faster at 1300#'s less race weight?
You realize that your post is exactly what bench racing is right?
Old 09-25-2011, 04:52 PM
  #46  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ablakez28
+1


You realize that your post is exactly what bench racing is right?
Yes I know my post is the definition of bench racing, but to call me a bench racER, emphasis on the er part, he is saying that I have no car, don't go the track at least once every week if not twice or more and actually race said car, or I am just a poser.

That's what I was asking.
Old 09-25-2011, 04:57 PM
  #47  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
ablakez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I am sure he just meant it as silly to say what you think your car will do unless you actually do it. It is real easy to make educated guesses based on factors that seem logical but it still doesn't make it fact.

Basically what skinnies did is amazing and until other people go beat it I think the speculation or downplaying because of weight is petty.
Old 09-25-2011, 05:20 PM
  #48  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ablakez28
I am sure he just meant it as silly to say what you think your car will do unless you actually do it. It is real easy to make educated guesses based on factors that seem logical but it still doesn't make it fact.

Basically what skinnies did is amazing and until other people go beat it I think the speculation or downplaying because of weight is petty.
I dunno how he meant it, I just am far from a bench racer. Everyone freaking bench races, hell everytime we put a new part on the car the first thing out of our mouth's is I bet it runs this now after this part.

So what I am asking is, we now can't bench race because it discredits his accomplishments?

Sorry it was a statement I made not to downplay his times at all, and the responses I got were kinda pissy, far from my intention of my statement.

I don't see why everyone is getting mad though when someone says his car weighs what it does and that's why it runs what it does....isn't it the truth? It weighs what it does it has x amount of rwhp so it goes x.xx at xxxmph in the 1/4 because of that, doesn't every other car that goes down the 1/4 follow this same murphy's law rule?

I just don't see why it's not ok to bring that up in a skinnies thread. Thats all.
Old 09-25-2011, 06:02 PM
  #49  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
ablakez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Look I am not going to sit here and argue. Sorry you disagree but I 100% think its tacky to act like something is reproducible if a car was simply lighter. When it does it.....it does it. Until it does then I don't really care since as we know things are just always easier on paper.
Old 09-25-2011, 06:44 PM
  #50  
On The Tree
 
quik67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grapevine,TX
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skinnies
My rx7 went 8.985 and took the stock shortblock record then a few weeks later smashed the oil pan when it did a bumper stand, the rx7 just sit in storage with no motivation, the motor/trans got put in my ltd daily driver, beat on all year. Well the record got beat a few weeks back, we decided to do something about it. I pulled the motor back out of the ltd(same motor from last year I got the record on, now with who knows how many beatings on it this year) and decided to put it back in the rx7....

Last Saturday we started working on the rx7, as of 1pm yesterday it started and ran, 6pm headed to the track, we made one 1/8th hit, one 330ft hit(time slip got screwed so no data), then one full hit and did this...

1.409
3.794
5.777
124.17
8.918
156.73

We'll be hitting up another track a few hours away in two weeks to turn the boost back up to where it was in the ltd and actually leaving hard to see what it does, figured this was good enough for tonight since we only made a few hits and the car just got running hours before.
Those are really strong numbers, very impressive. At what boost level was this ? Also do you have any head work done or are those bone stock too? 156 mph making some horsepower! Do you have a build thread somewhere so I can look at your combination, gear ratio, tire size converter stall, etc. I understand if you want to keep a lid on this, just comparing your build with what I am using.

Last edited by quik67; 09-25-2011 at 07:15 PM.
Old 09-25-2011, 07:25 PM
  #51  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Congrads! I can't wait to see what it runs when you turn it up after seeing Hydrostream pick up 10mph going from the TC to the PT unit!
Old 09-25-2011, 07:30 PM
  #52  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
Stock truck cam. I shift it at 6500. It does see over 20 psi often. I also know there is power to be had in a camshaft but I liked the idea of being even more like a stock engine. No headstuds, no ls9 gaskets.
The visuals of your engine don't even come close to looking like a stock 5.3. The intake, electric water pump, tig'd catch cans, an fittings and all the braided line make it look like a high dollar race engine. I love all fast stock bottom end stuff, if I saw your cars in the pits I'd instantly assume it was a high dollar race engine. You're also running a GT 47-80 which is a lot more turbo than skinnies, but both of you two guy's setups are impressive!
Old 09-25-2011, 11:37 PM
  #53  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I don't really have any build threads on here, its a 5.3 with ls9 gaskets, arp head studs, good springs/pushroods, gt2-3 cam, everything else is stock including oil pump, rod bolts, timing chain, etc.

Put the car on the dyno today to get some ideas, looks like leaving higher rpm should help it(left easy at 3400rpm on Friday) and we are going to spray it, should pick up around 100rwhp from the passes on Friday. I really need an 88 on it!
Old 09-26-2011, 07:54 AM
  #54  
On The Tree
 
quik67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grapevine,TX
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skinnies
I don't really have any build threads on here, its a 5.3 with ls9 gaskets, arp head studs, good springs/pushroods, gt2-3 cam, everything else is stock including oil pump, rod bolts, timing chain, etc.

Put the car on the dyno today to get some ideas, looks like leaving higher rpm should help it(left easy at 3400rpm on Friday) and we are going to spray it, should pick up around 100rwhp from the passes on Friday. I really need an 88 on it!
Thanks for the information, are the Ls9 gaskets better than the oem 5.3?
What tire size and rear gear?
Yeah I know, I don't have any build threads or many pics either. I get too busy working on it and really don't think much about taking pics etc.
Man, your mph should be getting you mid to low 8 sec. times with the 1.40 sixty doesn't help much. I bet a 100 shot would wake it up. When you smashed your pan last year, you should have been launching hard enough for low 1.30's that should really lower your times, what have you done to soften the launch? less boost? less rpm?
Again, thanks for sharing.
Old 09-26-2011, 09:35 AM
  #55  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
JoeyGC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St Joe, MO
Posts: 2,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Very impressive Justin Over the winter your going to do the chassis and cage updates then?
Old 09-26-2011, 11:06 AM
  #56  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Rickys S/C Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MOREHEAD KY
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=black98ws6ta;15429367]5.3 with arp head bolts, pushrods, and valvesprings. Here is a engine bay pic, I dont have the slip beside me to post exact numbers. Congrats on getting the car back together and the record.





peck that thing looks bad *** man!!
Old 09-26-2011, 11:36 AM
  #57  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
The Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL at the bench racers and those getting butt hurt at the weight. Who held a gun to your head and said you have to drive a pig?
Old 09-26-2011, 11:49 AM
  #58  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Tejas
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by The Beast
LOL at the bench racers and those getting butt hurt at the weight. Who held a gun to your head and said you have to drive a pig?
x2 .
Old 09-26-2011, 11:50 AM
  #59  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

If your referring to me, I am in no way shape or form butt hurt over his car. I have been a skinnies fan for a while now, jesus christ.

All I said was my car would run 1 second faster if it weighed 1300#'s less.

There is some serious going on in here.
Old 09-26-2011, 12:46 PM
  #60  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Pretty darn impressive! Gives me hope for my build. What rear diff are you running under that car? I may have missed it, but are you just running a single 76mm turbo?


Quick Reply: A year ago today I took the stock shortblock record...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.