precision vs turbonetics? anybody done a comparison on the dyno
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
precision vs turbonetics? anybody done a comparison on the dyno
i have twin TC70's with a .81 a/r and was thinking of getting PT67's or PT71's with the billet wheels and a .68 a/r. i want to make more power and i want to spool faster. so has anybody done a comparison between the two?
Last edited by jeremym; 09-30-2011 at 09:39 AM.
#4
With that displacement you probably would not want to go smaller than the .83 A/R on T4s. From what I've read the billet wheels don't change the spool characteristic much if at all.
#6
TECH Apprentice
do it justice and leave the larger a/r turbine.
the smaller comp wheel from pte is better than turbonetics 70mm
Trending Topics
#11
TECH Apprentice
#12
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob..._Machined.html
I think you could address other aspects like, cam, compression, and tune to deal with the spooling issues.
I think you could address other aspects like, cam, compression, and tune to deal with the spooling issues.
#17
On The Tree
#18
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
The turbos on your car now are 7068s. There's no reason to change to a pair of 7168s. You need to address other issues like the cam, compression, and potentially the tune if you're unhappy with the spooling of the car. If you want to throw some money around please throw some my way. I'll send you my paypal.
#19
We run 70psi with cast wheels on our sled pullers all the time. Billet is NOT necessary for anything other then extreme apps which not many setups can live under any how......definitely not gas motors.