C5 Dyno (408ci, Twin T66, AEM EMS)
#141
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
I did a little reading over at www.Supraforums.com and it sounded like the C5 was detuned but I am sure it was not detuned for the dyno... can we get more accurate info?
Needless to say I would expect that C5 at 1100-1200 rwhp to run 160mph trap speeds. Isn't that John Meany territory?
Needless to say I would expect that C5 at 1100-1200 rwhp to run 160mph trap speeds. Isn't that John Meany territory?
#142
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
I did a little reading over at www.Supraforums.com and it sounded like the C5 was detuned but I am sure it was not detuned for the dyno... can we get more accurate info?
Needless to say I would expect that C5 at 1100-1200 rwhp to run 160mph trap speeds. Isn't that John Meany territory?
Needless to say I would expect that C5 at 1100-1200 rwhp to run 160mph trap speeds. Isn't that John Meany territory?
The car had only been running a week prior to the event and really hadn't seen anything but dyno time since we were all busy working on the 3 cars that ended up going to TX... I will get the timeslips and the dyno chart up ASAP (even the 1200RWHP that we did here in Tucson before we loaded it up for TX).
It wasn't detuned for the dyno, but apparantly, the old dyno had a speed limit of 160MPH and this caused the first two runs to abort with no data. On the third run the operator shut it down before 160 so at least some data could be recorded. I haven't seen the chart, but I believe it was 1013RWHP@4800RPM... It peaks around 6300 and at 4800 the rate of change on the graph is still high...
#143
I ruin the end of films...
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Taking back some video tapes
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Needless to say I would expect that C5 at 1100-1200 rwhp to run 160mph trap speeds. Isn't that John Meany territory?