anyone using gapless rings for FI?
anyone using gapless rings for FI? just wondering if there would be an advantage to using gapless top ring for my rebuild? Is anyone using them, good or bad expieriences?
I used them on my last rebuild but only got about 300 miles out of the rebuild ;( not the rings fault. Picked up some power def compared to my other rings. I think the only downfall is they will wear faster
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
9 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
In mine it was the top ring. It's a stainless 2 piece affair to create the gapless effect.
But the 2nd and oil rings are just conventional
As long as they are used correctly, bore finish is good, then I see little reason why they would wear faster, and certainly no reason they would score the bores.
9 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
9 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
What benefit could a full circle seal offer against a seal with a gap ?
I think the benefit is obvious, even if in reality it it is only very small.
Normal rings dont have a gap because they want a gap there, it's simply required by design.
Obviously gapless rings do still have a gap, but by design the 2 rings overlap so where the normal gap would be, there is still a solid piece of ring passing over it.
If there really is a measurable difference, it would be incredibly small. Most likely less blowby, and less crankcase pressure.
Power.....doubtful it will really make any difference
I think the benefit is obvious, even if in reality it it is only very small.
Normal rings dont have a gap because they want a gap there, it's simply required by design.
Obviously gapless rings do still have a gap, but by design the 2 rings overlap so where the normal gap would be, there is still a solid piece of ring passing over it.
If there really is a measurable difference, it would be incredibly small. Most likely less blowby, and less crankcase pressure.
Power.....doubtful it will really make any difference
