Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Why #7?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2012, 11:06 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
 
Wicked69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AutomagicLS1
you'll crack #7 hole if you dont have the rear steam tubes hooked up.
Would you say this is more so on pump gas (91)? I'm running E85 and no intercooler but conservative timing, water injection, and a colder plug. When I do an all out pass I just pull the #5, 7 and tune from there.

I do plan to run it in the future when I get around to forging this one and going crazy on the boost.
Old 03-28-2012, 11:42 PM
  #22  
Teching In
 
slpfirehawk415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by westtexasbuff
I plan on making these custom water vapor lines in about 2-3 months for those that are interested. I have the same setup on mine.



I could swear my engine has this thing already because I took it apart and put it back together, are you guys saying that the tubes are too small or are not functional in the rear?
Old 03-28-2012, 11:55 PM
  #23  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

I run the kurt urban kit. Its a nice setup. The rear of the cylinders should always be vented it. I dont care what your setup is. If you run it hard they should be vented. SLPfirehawk you probly have the stock ls1 lines they vent the rear but wont fit under a fast intake and just grind down the ribs on the ls6 intake to fit. But I put the fast on so I went with the KUP system.
Old 03-29-2012, 12:48 AM
  #24  
Teching In
 
slpfirehawk415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zmg00camaross
I run the kurt urban kit. Its a nice setup. The rear of the cylinders should always be vented it. I dont care what your setup is. If you run it hard they should be vented. SLPfirehawk you probly have the stock ls1 lines they vent the rear but wont fit under a fast intake and just grind down the ribs on the ls6 intake to fit. But I put the fast on so I went with the KUP system.
Yes mine is the stock one. Im confused now though. It sounds like your saying that everyboyd who broke ringland #7 broke it because they got an intake and blocked off the vents in the rear, but that couldn't possibly be true, right? I mean the vents are obviously and integral part of the cars engineering, everybody wouldn't just go blocking them off like that right? Can somebody clarify this for me?
Old 03-29-2012, 01:18 PM
  #25  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

As it's been explained to me, it's a heat related issue with #7. Not sure exactly why, but #7 piston and chamber get hotter than the rest. This causes issues with the factory rings and ring lands on the pistons. Horsepower is heat, so at a stock level, running stock programming that puts the AFR in the mid to low 12s, it's not an issue.

But bump up compression, bump up horsepower, lean it out a little bit and the temperatures in the cylinder start to rise, as does the cylinder pressure (isn't that what torque is directly related to, cylinder pressure?).

In 2001, all of the f-bodies and corvettes had the ls6 intake, and the rear steam vents were closed.

A wise man told me, keep the cylinder heat under control, and you'll keep the motor together.
Old 03-29-2012, 01:27 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

I agree with all that ^^ Stock engines and such will be fine. But when you start adding power they should be vented.
Old 03-29-2012, 03:29 PM
  #27  
Teching In
 
slpfirehawk415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so then the 98-99 have a vented front and rear but the later models have only a vented front?
Old 03-29-2012, 03:50 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Y2KFirehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saucon Valley, PA
Posts: 731
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slpfirehawk415
so then the 98-99 have a vented front and rear but the later models have only a vented front?
98 through 2000 are vented front and rear but do not come with LS6 intakes. 2001-2002 cars came with LS6 intakes but plugged rear vents.
Old 03-29-2012, 04:01 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Midnight02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Very inciteful thread. My car is in the shop getting a rebuild because of the dreaded #7 ringland failure. 2002 SS -- stock bottom end + heads/cam/Fast 92/spray.

So I presume that the rear vents are covered on my car (2002). If that's the case, am I crazy to go back with the same setup (FAST intake, etc.) and NOT do something different with the rear vents?
Old 03-29-2012, 04:51 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
 
91sonomast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Murray, KY
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It appears as though you are, the KUP kit is only $200
Old 03-29-2012, 05:30 PM
  #31  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
93camaro_zzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by westtexasbuff
I plan on making these custom water vapor lines in about 2-3 months for those that are interested. I have the same setup on mine.



That is trick as hell! Very nice idea and fabrication1 Wouldn't be too hard either as long as you know how to tap, and do tubing bending and flaring.
Old 03-29-2012, 05:56 PM
  #32  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Midnight02
Very inciteful thread. My car is in the shop getting a rebuild because of the dreaded #7 ringland failure. 2002 SS -- stock bottom end + heads/cam/Fast 92/spray.

So I presume that the rear vents are covered on my car (2002). If that's the case, am I crazy to go back with the same setup (FAST intake, etc.) and NOT do something different with the rear vents?
Yes vent it. And you are spraying, That cylinder is all ready hotter and when you spray that cylinder is more prone to denotation.
Old 03-29-2012, 10:20 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Midnight02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Zmg00camaross
Yes vent it. And you are spraying, That cylinder is all ready hotter and when you spray that cylinder is more prone to denotation.
Thanks! At $200 for the kit (and the cars already in the shop for the rebuild) I don't see much downside to doing it.
Old 03-29-2012, 10:56 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
Adam86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Faribault, MN
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Y2KFirehawk
98 through 2000 are vented front and rear but do not come with LS6 intakes. 2001-2002 cars came with LS6 intakes but plugged rear vents.
I was wondering about that. I have a '98 with the stock coolant setup and an LS6 intake with the bottom dremelled out. I take it I should be ok then?
Old 03-29-2012, 10:56 PM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Midnight02
Thanks! At $200 for the kit (and the cars already in the shop for the rebuild) I don't see much downside to doing it.
but of course, If you want to go cheaper then you can get another front cross over and run a line from that and use a t fitting into the front one. But the kit is nice and sure looks good.
Old 03-30-2012, 06:14 AM
  #36  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
 
30th t/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 3,098
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

what is the benefits with the KUP kit over just running the 98-00 setup?
You could notch out the bottom of the LS6 intake and spend alot less for the 98-00 coolant lines.
Old 03-30-2012, 10:49 AM
  #37  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
LS14EVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fenton, MI
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Glad I brought this up. Great discussion going on here. Looks like if I do any more mods, I'll be venting the rear of my 02.
Old 03-30-2012, 11:20 AM
  #38  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I melted cyl 7 on 2 forged ls1 engines. No steam vent hooked up. I ended up getting a pre 2000 vent tube and shaVing down the bottom of my ls6 intake to make it fit. No real need to spend any money on a kit, the factory one works fine
Old 03-30-2012, 11:43 AM
  #39  
BMW ///M Nerd
iTrader: (5)
 
BAD ASS TA WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Where does the braided line on the above pictured setup run to off of that steam port distribution block?
Old 03-30-2012, 01:08 PM
  #40  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Y2KFirehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saucon Valley, PA
Posts: 731
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SPRAYED 01
I ended up getting a pre 2000 vent tube and shaVing down the bottom of my ls6 intake to make it fit. No real need to spend any money on a kit, the factory one works fine
Exactly what I did upon installing my LS6 intake on my 2000. I maintained the factory vent tube by modifying the bottom of the LS6 intake.


Quick Reply: Why #7?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.