Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

YET another 5.3L junker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2012 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default YET another 5.3L junker

thought i would share. the car is a 68 chevelle, 4 link back halved car, with 33X14.5 rears. car weighed 2900lb with big block so it should be lighter then that when im done. going to be running on e98 and mid 8's is the goal.

engine:
stocker 5.3l
EPP blower cam
chromoly push rods
.650 valve springs
ls9 gaskets
ARP head bolts
ls1 intake
ls6 fuel rail (inside joke)
220lb injectors
QTP headers

power adder:
F1 procharger with cogs (lsx transplant kit)



will update on progress as i move along

Last edited by night ryder; 07-02-2012 at 11:11 PM.
Old 07-02-2012 | 12:02 AM
  #2  
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 1
From: Shawnee,KS
Default

did you mean ARP head studs?
Old 07-02-2012 | 12:07 AM
  #3  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default

Originally Posted by AutomagicLS1
did you mean ARP head studs?

nope bolts. had them laying around, so figured i would try them
Old 07-02-2012 | 12:10 AM
  #4  
M2W-GTO's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: LJC via STL
Default

Can't wait to see how this one turns out!
Old 07-02-2012 | 12:21 AM
  #5  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default

also i kept everything in mind with this build. i went supercharged as there is no pieces or contaminated oil going through it like a turbo would. i went with a cog so the crank wouldn't have the tension on it like a rib belt would. i will also be running a engine diaper of coarse, and the exhaust will exit behind the rear tire's so no oil going through the exhaust cant get on the rear brakes or tires.

Last edited by night ryder; 07-02-2012 at 12:32 AM.
Old 07-02-2012 | 08:06 AM
  #6  
quik67's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine,TX
Default

Great to see another 4-link, 5.3ls transplant car. What did the car run with the big block at 2900 lbs.
Keep us informed.
Old 07-02-2012 | 04:41 PM
  #7  
quik67's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine,TX
Default

Do you have any other pics you can post?
Old 07-02-2012 | 09:20 PM
  #8  
Bobsmyuncle's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Default

That cog will have just as much tension under acceleration. If not more than a ribbed setup But I'm interested to see wht it does. So i hope it works
Old 07-02-2012 | 10:44 PM
  #9  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default

Originally Posted by Bobsmyuncle
That cog will have just as much tension under acceleration. If not more than a ribbed setup But I'm interested to see wht it does. So i hope it works

shouldn't. with a cog, there is tension of turning the supercharger. with a belt it has to be super tight to prevent slippage, plus the tension of turning the supercharger. at least thats how it work in my mind.
Old 07-02-2012 | 10:53 PM
  #10  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default

Originally Posted by quik67
Do you have any other pics you can post?

i didn't own it when it had the big block. traded my 98 ss roller for it. here is the only picture i have right now of the whole car.




this is my old setup before i got this 5.3 idea. had a 408 and had a 106mm ready to be mounted, but got bored with it. also didn't like the idea of spending $$$$$ to keep it running every year. just wasnt fun anymore.

Old 07-03-2012 | 09:01 AM
  #11  
quik67's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine,TX
Default

Originally Posted by night ryder
i didn't own it when it had the big block. traded my 98 ss roller for it. here is the only picture i have right now of the whole car.




this is my old setup before i got this 5.3 idea. had a 408 and had a 106mm ready to be mounted, but got bored with it. also didn't like the idea of spending $$$$$ to keep it running every year. just wasnt fun anymore.

That's a great looking car!
I like the direction you are going with the 5.3, I'm really anxious to see how it turns out. I can relate on the $$$$$ for a high end engine and routine maintenance, that's the exact same reason i decided to go cheap 5.3.
What are you using for fuel management? Stock ECM?
FYI: My car weighed 3047 lbs with the blown bbc and now weighs 3024 lbs with the
5.3 and twin turbos,full exhaust, full interior and sound system. So you should be well under 2900 when done. Are you using an aluminum block 5.3?

Last edited by quik67; 07-03-2012 at 09:17 AM.
Old 07-03-2012 | 07:48 PM
  #12  
Bobsmyuncle's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by night ryder
shouldn't. with a cog, there is tension of turning the supercharger. with a belt it has to be super tight to prevent slippage, plus the tension of turning the supercharger. at least thats how it work in my mind.
I know there isn't tension on it when the motor is not rotating, cogs are very loose infact. But UNDER ACCELERATION, there is tremendous amount of tension. Our ysi car had an 8tibbed setup, slipped, so we swapped to a cog, and ended up bending our brackets bc under WOT the cog had a LARGE amount of tension. Pulled the front of the blower down and started slacking the opposite side of the belt. U would be Amazed at how much tension there is when that motor wants to accelerate straight to 7k, and the blower doesn't. And this was on an easier to spin ysi.
Old 07-06-2012 | 05:46 PM
  #13  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default

Originally Posted by quik67
That's a great looking car!
I like the direction you are going with the 5.3, I'm really anxious to see how it turns out. I can relate on the $$$$$ for a high end engine and routine maintenance, that's the exact same reason i decided to go cheap 5.3.
What are you using for fuel management? Stock ECM?
FYI: My car weighed 3047 lbs with the blown bbc and now weighs 3024 lbs with the
5.3 and twin turbos,full exhaust, full interior and sound system. So you should be well under 2900 when done. Are you using an aluminum block 5.3?

doing a stock computer and a iron block. the shop that will be tuning it did a car today that has same procharger and pulleys as mine, but has built motor 402, heads, and intake. it made 867whp. i cant slow down the procharger anymore, so it should be interesting.
Old 07-06-2012 | 05:52 PM
  #14  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default

Originally Posted by Bobsmyuncle
I know there isn't tension on it when the motor is not rotating, cogs are very loose infact. But UNDER ACCELERATION, there is tremendous amount of tension. Our ysi car had an 8tibbed setup, slipped, so we swapped to a cog, and ended up bending our brackets bc under WOT the cog had a LARGE amount of tension. Pulled the front of the blower down and started slacking the opposite side of the belt. U would be Amazed at how much tension there is when that motor wants to accelerate straight to 7k, and the blower doesn't. And this was on an easier to spin ysi.
not sure how you would have more tension then a belt setup under acceleration. sure its not going to slip like a belt, but there should be less tension as the belt is trying to rip off the snout becuase it has to be so tight, plus turn the supercharger. the cog is just turning the supercharger. your talking about belts slippage vs non slippage.

and you must of had one hell of tough crank snout, or a thin bracket
Old 07-30-2012 | 12:54 AM
  #15  
night ryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: south dakota
Default

made a little progress on the car. had to put in a steel firewall, steel tunnel, new front suspension, and completed a bunch of little things. here are a couple progress pictures.



wanted to see the stance with the new suspension. going to be scaled once it goes for the tune.


have to box in a few more things, then it gets carpet
Old 07-30-2012 | 03:32 AM
  #16  
BottleFedZ346's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl.
Default

Looking good!
Old 07-30-2012 | 06:11 PM
  #17  
91sonomast's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 337
Likes: 1
From: Murray, KY
Default

220lbs injectors?
Old 07-30-2012 | 11:17 PM
  #18  
Blown06's Avatar
8 Second Truck Club

iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 8
Default

What pulley combo and belt is that?
Old 07-31-2012 | 05:04 PM
  #19  
gnx7's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member20 Year Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 188
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

That is a bad *** Chevelle.

What front tubular suspension did you go with? Did you also replace the front spindles?
Old 07-31-2012 | 05:12 PM
  #20  
Adam86's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Faribault, MN
Default

That car should only be available in flat black. So badass. Very nice looking project.


Quick Reply: YET another 5.3L junker



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.