Fuel feed line size
Although what you propose for a lift pump and then the 044's, may be a concern as far as reliability of the package goes.
For your goals id just do a walbro 255hp intank and a 044 in line
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
And again, depending on your configuration, make sure the surge tank is always kept full. ie ensure the 044 does not outflow whatever is feeding it.
Googling suggests the red top can supply in the region of 180 litres per hour. A Single 044 will flow roughly 300lph.
That is a setup that can never work safely or reliably.
And again, depending on your configuration, make sure the surge tank is always kept full. ie ensure the 044 does not outflow whatever is feeding it.
Googling suggests the red top can supply in the region of 180 litres per hour. A Single 044 will flow roughly 300lph.
That is a setup that can never work safely or reliably.
But once engine consumption exceeds the red tops flow, the swirl tank will start to empty.
and Facet only rate their pump for say 250hp, maybe at a push 300hp. So once you're engine is making 300hp, that swirl tank will be emptying.
IMO if you insist on doing it this way ( and I'm not saying there is anything wrong with it ), you'd be better with one of those FM/Carter pumps at circa 80/100gph flow. They arent expensive either.
That way too, you could return all fuel from the engine to the main tank which means less hot fuel getting recirculated into the small swirl tank. It also simplifies plumbing a little more.
This type of thing, although there are a few variations.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Carter/180/P46...oductId=748050
http://www.jegs.com/i/Carter/180/P4601HP/10002/-1
At 100gph, it will outflow a single 044 under all circumstances. Plus the bonus of always pressurising the swirl tank slightly, which again can only assist the flow ability of the 044.
Last edited by stevieturbo; Dec 28, 2012 at 05:36 PM.
Will this pump here work?
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Carter-Un...item416ef6f3ac
Another Question is there any regulator you can recommend?
Or this one is the cheaper low pressure version. As you're only using it as a lift pump, it doesnt need to create much pressure. Either would do really, hardly makes any odds. They're both claiming the same flow numbers
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Universal...#ht_619wt_1059
Regulators...really there are loads. Aeromotive, Fuealab, Magnafuel etc etc
I'm using the Magnafuel 9950-B. It's bigger than I need, but means I'll never need another one.
But there are various ones on ebay/aus
http://www.magnafuel.com/products/ef.../MP-9940-B.htm
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/HOLLEY-12...ht_1875wt_1198
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/AEROMOTIV...#ht_1289wt_825
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/new-Aerom...#ht_2629wt_825
Or a second hand SX reg
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/SX-EFI-FU...#ht_500wt_1076
All of those regulators are return style. If you are running a lift pump, swirl tank etc etc, then you must have a return in the system somewhere, unless you are electronically controlling the main engine pump to regulate pressure and flow...which I doubt you are.
as apposed to an unregulated supply line to one side of the rail, and the reg on the other side.
Infact now i think about it, i think i could run any reg like that, so should be fine!!!
My goal is not to heat all the fuel upby sending it to the engine and back to the tank.
Ideally the reg would be close to the rails, but as long as you have sufficient flow to the engine so pressure is maintained, then you'll be fine.
The only negative with such a setup, is if it is a very hot engine bay, and fuel could boil in the rails after shutdown, hot starting and running may be harder until cool fuel makes its way up front.






