Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Out of curiousity why does everyone use 2.5" on the crossover pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2013, 04:00 PM
  #101  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Here is where we got the idea to change. They use 2" primary thick wall tubing.

http://www.full-race.com/store/turbo...-manifold.html

Edit: inside diameter was around 1.78", outside was 2.0"

Last edited by Sarg; 02-03-2013 at 04:09 PM.
Old 02-03-2013, 04:54 PM
  #102  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sarg
Here is where we got the idea to change. They use 2" primary thick wall tubing.

http://www.full-race.com/store/turbo...-manifold.html

Edit: inside diameter was around 1.78", outside was 2.0"
AFAIK, Full race uses 1.25 and 1.5 schedule 40 pipe for their manfolds. The 1.25 schedule 40 evo manifolds are about 1.375" ID while the 1.5" schedule 40s are 1.61" ID. I dont know of anyone using schedule 10-40 pipe with a SBC/BBC/LS. Everyone I know uses 18/16g tubing which has 1/2 the wall thickness if that. A 1.75" 16g has a larger ID than a 1.5 schedule 40.
Old 02-03-2013, 05:22 PM
  #103  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

It has been several years, but I could have sworn he used 2" stuff which was around 1.78 inside diameter and went to twin 2" ID pipes leading into a T4 turbo. We bought whatever it was he recommended but I could have sworn it was 1.78 ID
Old 02-03-2013, 06:12 PM
  #104  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sarg
It has been several years, but I could have sworn he used 2" stuff which was around 1.78 inside diameter and went to twin 2" ID pipes leading into a T4 turbo. We bought whatever it was he recommended but I could have sworn it was 1.78 ID
So did you ever build and test multiple combos or just buy what someone else recommended? The only problem with using pipe sized elbows is they only offer a couple useable sizes. I am somewhat reverse engineering street combos from proven race combos. When you take what you said and apply it to race combos, the tubes just doesn't make logical sense.

Better yet, what do 1200-1300hp imports use for tube sizes?
Old 02-04-2013, 04:21 AM
  #105  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have never built a 1200 hp import. We only tested the two combos. We were surprised to see the increase in spool up with the larger pipe size. We initially built it with the smaller size to try to promote more exhaust velocity but found that the subarus with their long exhaust tract seemed to like larger exhaust for whatever reason. This was a 400 awhp street car.
Old 02-09-2013, 03:46 PM
  #106  
Teching In
 
Crystalss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dudeman
if 2.5" cross over will support 2300hp, how much will a 2.25" crossover support? sorry if i missed it.
Originally Posted by Phil99vette
About 500hp less, 1800-1900.
I figured i would give this thread a bump...so I will ask some questions.

How much would 2" crossover support? around 1000?

Obviously my power will be much less than that so I am thinking about 2" crossover for my street LT1...hell I am actually kicking around the idea of 1.5" header primaries. On my setup I will have to merge the two 2" pipes into a single 2.5" pipe into a t4 .96 ar t70 MasterPower turbo. Or should my merge be a single 2.25" pipe? The merge will be about a foot long with a 90.
two 2" pipes = 6.28 cross section
one 2.25 = 4" cross section
one 2.5 = 4.9 cross section

Looks like 2.5 is the better merge size? Comments?
Old 02-09-2013, 04:18 PM
  #107  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
turbocamaro125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Warfordsburg PA
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Phil...what will 2" support? 1k-1.2khp?
Old 02-09-2013, 04:20 PM
  #108  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Considering 2.5" will support 2400hp
2.25" will support 1800hp
2" would support 1000hp.
Old 02-09-2013, 09:05 PM
  #109  
Staging Lane
 
2000camaroSS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Antonio Tx
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

all kinds of great info in forced induction today, been on this forum for awhile. subd to 3 more threads today for a total of about 14 in 3 or 4 years
Old 02-10-2013, 10:18 AM
  #110  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

One day I am going to build a 1500hp x275 motor and I am sure it will make people scratch their heads on some things...
Old 02-10-2013, 10:35 AM
  #111  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
turbocamaro125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Warfordsburg PA
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

What combo would you build Phil?...I would like to know!
Old 02-10-2013, 12:14 PM
  #112  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
RacerXLs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NWI
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Me too lol
Old 02-10-2013, 12:42 PM
  #113  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
MattKatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I read this....Now you have me thinking.
Old 02-10-2013, 12:50 PM
  #114  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Dont take my advise, get maximum boost by corky bell and do some research.

Seems like a majority of v8 owners put retarded size pipes on their setups without ever testing or researching.

Some of my import friends make headers out of 1.25" schedule 20 pipes for a 400-500hp build.
The following users liked this post:
n2xlr8n66 (09-03-2021)
Old 02-10-2013, 12:58 PM
  #115  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
MattKatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont have time or patience to read stuff like that....Never have. I think all books should be condensed to the Nitty Gritty important cliffs....Thats all I want/Need.
Old 02-10-2013, 01:35 PM
  #116  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

In that case a 3" crossover would work perfect.
Old 02-10-2013, 02:09 PM
  #117  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
MattKatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Smart one...lol.
Old 02-10-2013, 02:11 PM
  #118  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,533
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Just run a 2.5" bro. If it's a dedicated race truck, and you're making that much power, then run the 2.5". Myself... I'm running 2.25" to my T6 but will be in the 750-1000whp range where I have absolutely zero reason to use 2.5".
Old 02-10-2013, 03:50 PM
  #119  
Teching In
 
RB440MIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dimondale, MI
Posts: 48
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Hi Phil,
Oddly enough, I was going to finish my 2.5 cross over for my 5.3 single turbo. It is about 1/2 way done, but I'd rather get it right now than do it all over again to optomize it later. I am using an f-car manifold on the left and a log manifold on the right. The manifold has a piece of schedule 10 2 inch stainless which has an ID around 2.25. The log on the right is sc 10 2.5 inch which matches the T4 flange nicely when ovalled with a vice. That all being said, I grabbed my copy of Maximum Boost and was not able to find the math to determine the correct cross over size. There was a mention of mach numbers and flow in the intercooler section. I would like to understand the math behind this. I would greatly appreciate any help so that I can size this cross ove correctly.


Thanks
Mike
Old 02-10-2013, 05:45 PM
  #120  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RB440MIKE
Hi Phil,
Oddly enough, I was going to finish my 2.5 cross over for my 5.3 single turbo. It is about 1/2 way done, but I'd rather get it right now than do it all over again to optomize it later. I am using an f-car manifold on the left and a log manifold on the right. The manifold has a piece of schedule 10 2 inch stainless which has an ID around 2.25. The log on the right is sc 10 2.5 inch which matches the T4 flange nicely when ovalled with a vice. That all being said, I grabbed my copy of Maximum Boost and was not able to find the math to determine the correct cross over size. There was a mention of mach numbers and flow in the intercooler section. I would like to understand the math behind this. I would greatly appreciate any help so that I can size this cross ove correctly.


Thanks
Mike
You using 1 or 2 turbos? Any pics


Quick Reply: Out of curiousity why does everyone use 2.5" on the crossover pipe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.