Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Set me straight on pump gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2013, 09:22 PM
  #181  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bikerman9967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by allout06
thats $4.90/gallon ...holy ****... id go thru 55 gallons in a few weeks easy..



Id be afraid inconsistancy would be a problem here. i dont know of anyone really using it in my town. I know several do in indianapolis, which is about an hour directly south of me..

For me, E85 would be great if my car were a track only car. but since itll be on the street 99% of the time, i really have to stick with 93/meth.
I don't trust it out of the pump here at all. I think I'm going to be going bigger in cubes , much bigger. I don't want to run meth. Just intercooler
Old 05-29-2013, 06:54 AM
  #182  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,610
Received 1,751 Likes on 1,307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by badhombre
lets say we tune with my injectors running at 80% duty cycle on pump gas and a WOT afr of 12.9:1 and timing accordingly.
aaaaaannndddd......BOOM!


And just FYI, everyone already knows that you would have to turn the boost/timing/etc WAY down if all you plan to do is swap to E85 and make no changes in fuel. It just serves no usefulness which is why nobody in their right mind would do it. Say your "experiment" works, what did you prove? That it takes more E85 fuel to keep the same A/F ratio compared to gasoline???? Congrats, that was a waste of time and you made less power because you didn't want to take advantage of E85.....
Old 05-29-2013, 07:04 AM
  #183  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
badhombre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
As I said, for such a low power build, pump or E85 hardly matters. So you're just spouting dribble. 600hp is pretty tame, grow a set and aim higher.

And only an idiot would try to tune and simply retain injector duties at a fixed amount.

Just do the bloody thing right and build a fuel system appropriate for the build
my setup will be higher. I was just using round numbers that were close to make an example. Building a high flowing fuel system to run a fuel that is practically unobtainable to see marginal gains is not worth it to me.

Dude, I've been holding back but I gotta say, you're thinking on why people go E85 is all wrong. People who go E85 understand that you need to build the fuel system to support it, otherwise you have to do what you're saying.

Here's what it boils down to. Say you max your motor on pump gas (even with duty cycle at 60%, whatever... who cares) at say 600rwhp@15psi. Lets just say for giggles that you can't risk turning it up any more because of the risk of detonation. THAT is the limiting factor, NOT fuel flow, NOT fuel Injector Duty cycles, NOT fuel pumps. DETONATION.

Now enter E85. Up the fuel injectors to 105 lbs, up the fuel pumps to twin 255s or whatever you need to flow the E85. NOW you can increase the boost and timing to reach upwards of 800 rwhp on the SAME MOTOR that was maxxed on gas. THAT is what everyone is trying to say.

Your point is true.... if you leave everything the same (built to handle the flow needed for pump gas, and at the edge of that limit), you CAN'T handle the flow needed for E85 and you'll never see the benefits of it.

Now if you want high horsepower, you gotta pay to play. You MUST build your supporting systems to a level that is safe for your fuel. Imagine this, somebody says "I want to put a 2000rwhp engine in my Camaro, behind the stock 4l60." That's what your'e saying right now. You want to put this fantastic thing we call E85 into a car that won't support it. BOOM! Just like a 2000 rwhp engine behind a 4l60 will shred it.

If you only want a 600 rwhp car, build it for that, Stevieturbo is right, you can easilly get there on gas. Great. That's about as much as you'll get on pump gas before you start to see detonation. You will have maxxed out the potential of the motor (Heads, cam, intake, pistons, etc).

Now when you're ready to push that SAME MOTOR (Heads, cam, intake, pistons, etc) to 800+ rwhp, you're gong to have to man up and buy a fuel system that will support it. Otherwise, you'll have to do what you're saying and de-tune the system because you can't supply the fuel it needs.

Regardless, your ENGINE has more potential with E85 that it does with pump gas, when supporting systems (fuel) are build correctly. THAT is the point everyone is trying to get across.
ok, let me put this to you this way. When doing a nitrous setup, you pill a wet kit for say a 150 shot. What do you do tuning wise? Pull timing. Say you pill it up to 200. You start seeing 1/2* of kr. Do you put smaller pills back in, or pull a little more timing to handle this amount of air/fuel? I don't know about you guys, but I always just pulled a little timing to take full advantage of the shot. Did I lose some "potential power" by pulling timing out. yeah probably, but it helps the engine live, and in the end still makes more power. You guys are acting like pulling timing will make the motor lay over or something. That isn't how it works. It has been known fact in the nitrous world for years. You add more air and fuel, yes you gotta pull timing. BUT the increased volume of air and fuel is what is making the higher power, not running higher timing
Old 05-29-2013, 09:38 AM
  #184  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bikerman9967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this guy is confusing the crap out of me
Old 05-29-2013, 09:42 AM
  #185  
Staging Lane
 
lurker1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You only pull timing on a nitrous timing to do what? AVOID DETONATION , because of the lack of octane available. You would make more power on that same 200 shot if you could keep the timing where it was , or better yet, increase it to take advantage of a higher octane fuel.
Old 05-29-2013, 09:50 AM
  #186  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Silver Sleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Goldsboro/Pikeville NC
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agreed..the advantage of E85 is the ability to run a more agressive timing curve with XXX amount of boost without detonation. same principle as any race fuel except ethanol has a different makeup wich requires more fuel volume. with the correct E85 setup some ditch their intercooler setups and make more power. pump gas blowthrough carb guys can run without an intercooler...ive seen frost on a non intercooled E85 blowthrough carb intakr manifold..while the carb by design and the way it atomizes fuel allows for chemical intercooling in itself no matter the fuel, its obvious that the E85 takes it above and beyond what regular pump gas can do.

regardless of how the OP wants to run it, he wil find out that pulling timing to make up for the the lack of a fuel system to support E85 will do nothing but cause problems and dissapoint..
Old 05-29-2013, 09:54 AM
  #187  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Silver Sleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Goldsboro/Pikeville NC
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tuning for nitrous and tuning for boost are two different animals...


Originally Posted by badhombre
my setup will be higher. I was just using round numbers that were close to make an example. Building a high flowing fuel system to run a fuel that is practically unobtainable to see marginal gains is not worth it to me.



ok, let me put this to you this way. When doing a nitrous setup, you pill a wet kit for say a 150 shot. What do you do tuning wise? Pull timing. Say you pill it up to 200. You start seeing 1/2* of kr. Do you put smaller pills back in, or pull a little more timing to handle this amount of air/fuel? I don't know about you guys, but I always just pulled a little timing to take full advantage of the shot. Did I lose some "potential power" by pulling timing out. yeah probably, but it helps the engine live, and in the end still makes more power. You guys are acting like pulling timing will make the motor lay over or something. That isn't how it works. It has been known fact in the nitrous world for years. You add more air and fuel, yes you gotta pull timing. BUT the increased volume of air and fuel is what is making the higher power, not running higher timing
Old 05-29-2013, 10:29 AM
  #188  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by badhombre
my setup will be higher. I was just using round numbers that were close to make an example. Building a high flowing fuel system to run a fuel that is practically unobtainable to see marginal gains is not worth it to me.

ok, let me put this to you this way. When doing a nitrous setup, you pill a wet kit for say a 150 shot. What do you do tuning wise? Pull timing. Say you pill it up to 200. You start seeing 1/2* of kr. Do you put smaller pills back in, or pull a little more timing to handle this amount of air/fuel? I don't know about you guys, but I always just pulled a little timing to take full advantage of the shot. Did I lose some "potential power" by pulling timing out. yeah probably, but it helps the engine live, and in the end still makes more power. You guys are acting like pulling timing will make the motor lay over or something. That isn't how it works. It has been known fact in the nitrous world for years. You add more air and fuel, yes you gotta pull timing. BUT the increased volume of air and fuel is what is making the higher power, not running higher timing
Originally Posted by HRHohio

Here's what it boils down to. Say you max your motor on pump gas (even with duty cycle at 60%, whatever... who cares) at say 600rwhp@15psi. Lets just say for giggles that you can't risk turning it up any more because of the risk of detonation. THAT is the limiting factor, NOT fuel flow, NOT fuel Injector Duty cycles, NOT fuel pumps. DETONATION.

Now enter E85. Up the fuel injectors to 105 lbs, up the fuel pumps to twin 255s or whatever you need to flow the E85. NOW you can increase the boost and timing to reach upwards of 800 rwhp on the SAME MOTOR that was maxxed on gas. THAT is what everyone is trying to say.

If you only want a 600 rwhp car, build it for that, Stevieturbo is right, you can easilly get there on gas. Great. That's about as much as you'll get on pump gas before you start to see detonation. You will have maxxed out the potential of the motor (Heads, cam, intake, pistons, etc).

Regardless, your ENGINE has more potential with E85 that it does with pump gas, when supporting systems (fuel) are build correctly. THAT is the point everyone is trying to get across.

I highlighted the points I think you missed.

Also, by your logic, you can force as much pump gas and air as you want as long as you pull enough timing. There comes a point of diminishing returns. i.e. Maxxed out engine.

Again... at that point, you have MORE potential still with E85.
Old 05-29-2013, 11:17 AM
  #189  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

I'm going to turbocharge my car...but I'm going to run it at 0psi boost so I dont have to change anything
Old 05-29-2013, 11:33 AM
  #190  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
I'm going to turbocharge my car...but I'm going to run it at 0psi boost so I dont have to change anything
I'm going to boost mine to 90 psi, but pull timing 180 degrees, to be safe and make huge power. Who needs that E85... Witches Brew!

http://www.importtuner.com/tech/impp...e/viewall.html


For those who still understand octane at this point.... here's an interesting article on Methanol/Water injection and it's benefits if you can't get E85 or still want to run pump gas.

http://www.snowperformance.net/produ...cle-pdf-42.pdf

Very interesting reads.

Last edited by HRHohio; 05-29-2013 at 11:44 AM.
Old 05-29-2013, 05:50 PM
  #191  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

This is still going?
Old 05-29-2013, 06:30 PM
  #192  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
SPRAYED 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

That should really shut this down. People are going to search and find this thread. If they don't read through they might actually think that you can make more power on pump gas. This could cost some one a blown engine. We all know badhonbre is dead wrong. Honestly i think he does to but is to proud to admit it. Close this down!!!
Old 05-29-2013, 06:32 PM
  #193  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,610
Received 1,751 Likes on 1,307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
This is still going?
You know what they say about a train wreck...
Old 05-29-2013, 07:20 PM
  #194  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bikerman9967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm kind of pissed I didn't get the information I was looking for. I'd like a semi straight answer but it doesn't seem like it will happen
Old 05-29-2013, 07:28 PM
  #195  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bikerman9967
I'm looking at building a 1000hp street chevelle. I would like it to run on pump gas, but if it can't be done, it can't be done. I can get e85 but its from the pump as well and not sure it's trustworthy
Hopefully to help answer your question a little, I think you can get there on pump gas, but you'll need methanol/water. That's with all the best stuff on your engine taken care of... start with a 6.0L or better, Heads/Cam setup, forged pistons, fuel system, etc.

If you accept 1000 hp CRANK or ~850 RWHP, I don't see a problem with it. If you avoid Methanol/Water, I think you'll have a hard time getting there safely.


Here's another similar thread without all the confusion. LOL.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...-pump-gas.html

Or, just grab your checkbook.... NRE --> http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...x/viewall.html

The consensus on that thread is "Yes, it can be done". Good luck!

Last edited by HRHohio; 05-29-2013 at 07:35 PM. Reason: Added other post.
Old 05-29-2013, 07:32 PM
  #196  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
This is still going?
ROFL! That's what happens when someone throws a wrench in the works... everyone pitches in to fix it. LOL
Old 05-30-2013, 05:16 AM
  #197  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bikerman9967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
Hopefully to help answer your question a little, I think you can get there on pump gas, but you'll need methanol/water. That's with all the best stuff on your engine taken care of... start with a 6.0L or better, Heads/Cam setup, forged pistons, fuel system, etc.

If you accept 1000 hp CRANK or ~850 RWHP, I don't see a problem with it. If you avoid Methanol/Water, I think you'll have a hard time getting there safely.


Here's another similar thread without all the confusion. LOL.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...-pump-gas.html

Or, just grab your checkbook.... NRE --> http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...x/viewall.html

The consensus on that thread is "Yes, it can be done". Good luck!
I'm not dead set on 1000 rwhp . If I'm within 150hp those are pretty wild numbers. I've been looking into water/meth and my only concern is how long a tank lasts. I know you can get bigger tanks, but it i have to fill 2.5 gallons of water/meth every 20 gallons of fuel it will suck. Anyone use a kit on the street with a high hp application?
Old 05-30-2013, 08:42 AM
  #198  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bikerman9967
I'm not dead set on 1000 rwhp . If I'm within 150hp those are pretty wild numbers. I've been looking into water/meth and my only concern is how long a tank lasts. I know you can get bigger tanks, but it i have to fill 2.5 gallons of water/meth every 20 gallons of fuel it will suck. Anyone use a kit on the street with a high hp application?
It's really not that bad. I have the snow methanol system and when street cruising (ie. not in boost), it doesn't use any meth/water. I have mine set to come on at 5psi progressively to 10psi. I use my windshield washer reservoir and can go all night on it. Also, I use the -30 windshield washer fluid (blue) for $2.99/gallon vs. the "Boost Juice". Plus, I keep a gallon in the trunk to top off if needed.

Everyone has an opinion on what to use, so talk with your tuner about what he's comfortable tuning on (straight meth, 50/50, or -30F) and do some more research on that.
Old 05-30-2013, 09:56 AM
  #199  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bikerman9967
I'm not dead set on 1000 rwhp . If I'm within 150hp those are pretty wild numbers. I've been looking into water/meth and my only concern is how long a tank lasts. I know you can get bigger tanks, but it i have to fill 2.5 gallons of water/meth every 20 gallons of fuel it will suck. Anyone use a kit on the street with a high hp application?
Depends on the nozzles! They size them in gph or gallons per hour! I have a single 10gph nozzle in my car (iirc). If you hold the throttle to the floor for one hour, it will consume 10 gallons of alcohol. If you have two 10gph nozzles, its 20 gallons per hour, etc etc.
Old 05-30-2013, 12:41 PM
  #200  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bikerman9967
I'm not dead set on 1000 rwhp . If I'm within 150hp those are pretty wild numbers. I've been looking into water/meth and my only concern is how long a tank lasts. I know you can get bigger tanks, but it i have to fill 2.5 gallons of water/meth every 20 gallons of fuel it will suck. Anyone use a kit on the street with a high hp application?

IMO all your questions have been answered

I would say yes you can achieve your power goals on pump gas alone. However, it will require very good intercooling and a lower compression than many might like. This will keep you away from detonation to allow you to use a sensible amount of ignition timing to make the power. Is it the preferred option ? not generally, but it will still work, and has worked for others for decades across many different engines.

And has already been answered several times. Meth usage/longevity depends on pump, nozzle size, tank size, when you inject and ultimately how often you actually put your foot down in such a manner as to actually be injecting.

I generally only inject water/meth when racing, so a 6-7 litre tank on the street would last me forever...simply because I dont use it there. I already have far more power than I do traction on the street, so the added power via meth is of no use.
When racing with suitable tyres and high traction surface, then I can make better use of any extra power.

IMO a 2.5-3 gallon tank ( AIS tanks are the best ) should last you a very long time, unless you drive like a complete lunatic all the time.


Quick Reply: Set me straight on pump gas



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.