Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Todays Challenge: What turbo for a 6.0L, 600hp, 2,300lb car...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:55 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
1970camaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Todays Challenge: What turbo for a 6.0L, 600hp, 2,300lb car...

I'm starting yet another new project, but this one is a bit off the wall. Not going to divulge all of the details, but here are a list of requirements/restrictions:

SMALL car, tiny engine bay
6.0L, head studs, rod bolts, small turbo specific cam *already on hand and must be used*
600hp at crank desired - no more than that, won't be able to put it to the ground...205 rear tire
Pump gas, non-intercooled
Single turbo
Turbo must be T3 sized, small frame - smaller the better
3" down-pipe max
Ball-bearing turbo not required/wanted for cost reasons

If you were wondering why not just do a N/A head-cam build? Idle quality is desired to be near stock. Car will be geared to do 1,800rpm or less at 60mph with a TH400 3-speed auto. This would greatly under-gear a N/A build.

So, what turbo would you choose?

Last edited by 1970camaroRS; 05-15-2013 at 01:23 PM.
Old 05-15-2013, 01:08 PM
  #2  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Slow94Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I would go smaller cubic inch to work better with a tiny turbo...
Old 05-15-2013, 01:22 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
1970camaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slow94Formula
I would go smaller cubic inch to work better with a tiny turbo...
The other constraint is that the 6.0L is already on hand, so it's going to be used.
Old 05-15-2013, 01:26 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Can't you at least squeeze a t4?
Old 05-15-2013, 01:30 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
 
67maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toledo
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The car wont be fun to drive. Your either going to put a big turbo on the car and choke it with what your looking to do or put a tiny turbo and reach its max flow very fast with that big of a CI motor. I would say a Precision 6262 would be the way to go if you still choose this project.
Old 05-15-2013, 01:32 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
1fastpickup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Be careful with that combo...small inefficient turbos will raise the IATs...combine that with pump gas and no intercooler...it's a recipe for hurting parts.
How do I know? Last year I blew up a SBC with a 58mm T4, non-intercooled on 100 octane, with 20 degrees timing. Broke 3 pistons and cracked the block! High IATs = detonation...and detonation kills.
Old 05-15-2013, 02:14 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BMF_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alexandria, Ky
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
I'm starting yet another new project, but this one is a bit off the wall. Not going to divulge all of the details, but here are a list of requirements/restrictions:

SMALL car, tiny engine bay
6.0L, head studs, rod bolts, small turbo specific cam *already on hand and must be used*
600hp at crank desired - no more than that, won't be able to put it to the ground...205 rear tire
Pump gas, non-intercooled
Single turbo
Turbo must be T3 sized, small frame - smaller the better
3" down-pipe max
Ball-bearing turbo not required/wanted for cost reasons

If you were wondering why not just do a N/A head-cam build? Idle quality is desired to be near stock. Car will be geared to do 1,800rpm or less at 60mph with a TH400 3-speed auto. This would greatly under-gear a N/A build.

So, what turbo would you choose?
I'm in the works of a very similar project as well, except much bigger DRs (325s). As said before, t4 or go with a smaller cube like a 4.8L. The T3 would even be small for a 4.8 though. If you could do a T4, one of the GTS turbos that PTE made would be much better and they are pretty compact units.

'86 Chevette here, 6.0L with either twin stock GN turbos or a single S475. Either way good luck.
Old 05-15-2013, 02:17 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
1970camaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I may try to get something like a 70mm T4 to fit, but I'm leaning more towards a 66mm T3. I too am a bit worried about IAT and choking the 6.0L...but that's the challenge set forth. Another thought is selling the 6.0L and finding an aluminum 5.3.
Old 05-15-2013, 02:21 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
1970camaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMF_Racing
'86 Chevette here, 6.0L with either twin stock GN turbos or a single S475. Either way good luck.
I'm dragging home a '63 MGB roadster this afternoon.
Old 05-15-2013, 02:45 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BMF_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alexandria, Ky
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
I'm dragging home a '63 MGB roadster this afternoon.
Nice. You do have less room than me. Do a build thread for sure.
Old 05-15-2013, 02:55 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
1970camaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMF_Racing
Nice. You do have less room than me. Do a build thread for sure.
I will, but I'm not starting one until after I have some significant progress first.
Old 05-15-2013, 03:18 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
redss82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Any chance of spraying meth or shoving a small air to water cooler some where? And a 70mm turbo seems to be about the right fit
Old 05-15-2013, 04:28 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Chicago TDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sell the 6.0, get a 4.8 or 5.3 for half what you sell that 6.0 for.
Get a newer Turbonetics 76 MM with the larger turbine wheel or a Precision 7675
Add some meth nozzles to the intake when you really want to romp on it.

Or, make provisions to run E85 and that will help your IAT's

With a 76 MM turbo and a 4.8, you are going to have 600+ WHP with the right tune even without an intercooler.
Old 05-15-2013, 04:40 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
1970camaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redss82
Any chance of spraying meth or shoving a small air to water cooler some where? And a 70mm turbo seems to be about the right fit
An air to water is a thought I've had.

Originally Posted by Chicago TDP
Sell the 6.0, get a 4.8 or 5.3 for half what you sell that 6.0 for.
Get a newer Turbonetics 76 MM with the larger turbine wheel or a Precision 7675
Add some meth nozzles to the intake when you really want to romp on it.

Or, make provisions to run E85 and that will help your IAT's

With a 76 MM turbo and a 4.8, you are going to have 600+ WHP with the right tune even without an intercooler.
600whp is not going to happen with 205 rear tire. I am starting to think an aluminum 5.3 and a small 66mm turbo might be a better fit.
Old 05-15-2013, 05:18 PM
  #15  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
I'm starting yet another new project, but this one is a bit off the wall. Not going to divulge all of the details, but here are a list of requirements/restrictions:

SMALL car, tiny engine bay
6.0L, head studs, rod bolts, small turbo specific cam *already on hand and must be used*
600hp at crank desired - no more than that, won't be able to put it to the ground...205 rear tire
Pump gas, non-intercooled
Single turbo
Turbo must be T3 sized, small frame - smaller the better
3" down-pipe max
Ball-bearing turbo not required/wanted for cost reasons

If you were wondering why not just do a N/A head-cam build? Idle quality is desired to be near stock. Car will be geared to do 1,800rpm or less at 60mph with a TH400 3-speed auto. This would greatly under-gear a N/A build.

So, what turbo would you choose?
Common sense says just throw a 427 or 454 n/a build at it. You will have no idle quality issues unless you choose to have them.

Trying to turbocharged a build for such a small increase in power borders on silly, especially when the turbo is just too small.

Of course it can be done though.
Old 05-15-2013, 05:46 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
 
67maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toledo
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
An air to water is a thought I've had.



600whp is not going to happen with 205 rear tire. I am starting to think an aluminum 5.3 and a small 66mm turbo might be a better fit.
I think you are going to like this setup a lot better. A 5.3 or even a 4.8 with a 6262 or a GT35R should work just fine.
Old 05-15-2013, 08:02 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
I'm dragging home a '63 MGB roadster this afternoon.
Got a good friend doing a 427 in a 69 mgc
Old 05-16-2013, 12:25 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

These On3 Performance turbos are actually very tiny and compact for a T4 turbo. I have a 76mm and I can't believe how small it is compared to the GT45 or BW's. Something to consider. Mine put down 485 rwhp the other day on the dyno at 10 psi, stock bottom end.

On3 pic: ($319 plus shipping).

http://www.ebay.com/itm/On-3-Performance-76mm-Turbo-Camaro-LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LSX-Camaro-Trans-Am-6-0l-5-3l-/140974408414?pt=Race_Car_Parts&hash=item20d2bac2de&vxp=mtr
Old 05-16-2013, 01:10 AM
  #19  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
1970camaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HRHohio
These On3 Performance turbos are actually very tiny and compact for a T4 turbo. I have a 76mm and I can't believe how small it is compared to the GT45 or BW's. Something to consider. Mine put down 485 rwhp the other day on the dyno at 10 psi, stock bottom end.

On3 pic: ($319 plus shipping).
That's interesting. I had considered the On3 before, but I didn't realize they were that physically small. Also, now that I have the car in my garage, its apparent that I have more room to play with than I thought I would. Previous owner already did the firewall and trans tunnel work and revised the steering to swap in a V8. An air to air Intercooler is out of the question though...
Old 05-16-2013, 06:13 AM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Small air to water can make things much easier to locate. That and a water tank over the rear tires may help in your application.


Quick Reply: Todays Challenge: What turbo for a 6.0L, 600hp, 2,300lb car...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.