Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Budget/eBay head studs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2014 | 11:26 PM
  #61  
3pedals's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 6
From: WPG MB
Default

I torqued mine to 85, but I beleive my tq wrench ends up a couple lb light. No broken studs and no trouble
Old 01-18-2014 | 07:54 AM
  #62  
Camaro9969's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 4
From: Granby, Mass
Default

They seem to work ok had them in my cheap block tq to 90 and had no issues now the real arps well that's a different story..........
Old 01-18-2014 | 08:39 AM
  #63  
aknovaman's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 105
From: Hog Back, KS
Default

So, tell the real aro story, plz.
Old 01-18-2014 | 09:58 AM
  #64  
turbotbirds's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

Interesting reading! I have snapped a few of the procomps on a Gen1 SBC at 75lbs, but it was on the second time the engine was put together.
Old 01-18-2014 | 12:05 PM
  #65  
Forcefed86's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,066
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro9969
They seem to work ok had them in my cheap block tq to 90 and had no issues now the real arps well that's a different story..........
Like I said back in post 43...

Over torquing a stud to 90lbs that is rated for 70lbs will result in less clamping force. Going over the yield point of a fastener (max stretch point) will permanently deform the bolt and weaken the clamping force. (or just break)

Same goes for ARP. Just because it doesn't break at 90ftlbs+ doesn't mean it's holding the head down better.
Old 01-18-2014 | 12:10 PM
  #66  
Hulkls1's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Default

I've used them 3 times works great my 5.3 is at 19# of boost going strong and I just got a set for my ls3 also
Old 01-18-2014 | 12:11 PM
  #67  
3pedals's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 6
From: WPG MB
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Like I said back in post 43...

Over torquing a stud to 90lbs that is rated for 70lbs will result in less clamping force. Going over the yield point of a fastener (max stretch point) will permanently deform the bolt and weaken the clamping force. (or just break)

Same goes for ARP. Just because it doesn't break at 90ftlbs+ doesn't mean it's holding the head down better.
Who says these things are rated for 70ftlbs?
Mine came with NO instructions - typical of chineese stuff. They claim them to be 8740 material, like the ARP's, so I torqued to acheive 80ftlbs like ARP wants their 8740 studs tq'd to.
Old 01-18-2014 | 12:16 PM
  #68  
Forcefed86's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,066
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Originally Posted by 3pedals
Who says these things are rated for 70ftlbs?
Mine came with NO instructions - typical of chineese stuff. They claim them to be 8740 material, like the ARP's, so I torqued to acheive 80ftlbs like ARP wants their 8740 studs tq'd to.
It's on the ebay page that sells them.

Head Stud Torque

11mm 70-75 ft-lbs should use ARP Lube or Thread torque lube,
8mm 23 ft-lbs
http://www.ebay.com/itm/221332526450...84.m1439.l2649





The ARP instructions said to use these values with ARP lube....

First pass 25lbft second pass at 50lbft, and finally a 3rd at 70lbft.

Finally install the 5 smaller ARP bolts and torque them to 22lbft.
And these values with motor oil.

If using motor oil use this:

First pass 30lbft second pass at 60lbft, and finally a 3rd at 80lbft.

install the 5 smaller ARP bolts and torque them to 28lbft.

Also I compared the ARP stud to the China stud and the black oxide on the ARP is much thicker. So 70ftlbs with arp lube probably over torqued them a bit.

Not that it won't "work", obviously it does. There are alot of variables people tend to ignore. I think thats why there are so many failures.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 01-18-2014 at 12:24 PM.
Old 01-18-2014 | 12:21 PM
  #69  
3pedals's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 6
From: WPG MB
Default

I got mine direct from Alper. no info there. I expected it in the box, nope.
If the Ebay site has acurate info then mine are over tq'd at 80. we will see how they hold up
Old 01-18-2014 | 12:32 PM
  #70  
Forcefed86's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,066
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Originally Posted by 3pedals
I got mine direct from Alper. no info there. I expected it in the box, nope.
If the Ebay site has acurate info then mine are over tq'd at 80. we will see how they hold up
That link I sent is Alper motorsports and they suggest 70-75. I'm sure it will be fine. The fastest stock block 5.3 car (1/8th) that I spoke with torqued his to 75. Same alper studs. He runs 30psi through a T88 on his and has been 5.18 in the 1/8th at 138 on them. Thats the hardest I've seen them pushed. Said he tried to go to 80 and the stud wanted to twist, so he left it.

http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=603924
Old 01-18-2014 | 01:22 PM
  #71  
Camaro9969's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 4
From: Granby, Mass
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Like I said back in post 43...

Over torquing a stud to 90lbs that is rated for 70lbs will result in less clamping force. Going over the yield point of a fastener (max stretch point) will permanently deform the bolt and weaken the clamping force. (or just break)

Same goes for ARP. Just because it doesn't break at 90ftlbs+ doesn't mean it's holding the head down better.
Didn't torque the arps to that just was saying what was done on the cheap jy motor. The arps were torqud to spec and one snapped off before I got to finish my third pass
I was watching the gauge snapped about 60-65ft lbs
Old 01-18-2014 | 02:08 PM
  #72  
Exidous's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 3
From: Under a rock
Default

I got a set of the Alper's as well. The quality leaves a bit to be desired as four of the large nuts were not threaded perpendicular to the stud and the pressure face would "wobble" as you rotated it. Alper was more than happy to send me four more nuts and they were perfect. Overall I've very happy with them for the price.

I haven't passed any boost through them yet but they torqued down just fine with ARP lube to 75lbft.
Old 01-18-2014 | 02:18 PM
  #73  
2muchboostNY's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Default

Good info....so just to reiterate, the Alper studs "should" be good to 75 lbs using ARP lube correct?
Old 01-18-2014 | 02:31 PM
  #74  
Exidous's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 3
From: Under a rock
Default

Yes. And make sure you check the flatness of the pressure face of the nut while spinning it on the stud. Four of mine were not square.
Old 01-18-2014 | 06:00 PM
  #75  
2muchboostNY's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Default

^^thanks for the heads up.
Old 01-18-2014 | 10:18 PM
  #76  
Turbo D's Avatar
Launching!

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 2
From: Calgary
Default

Arp bases their torque rating at 80% of yield of the stud. I'm sure there is some variance if somebody is using a $500 snap on digital torque wrench or a $15 one from HF.
Old 01-18-2014 | 11:04 PM
  #77  
WheelsUp84z's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 4
From: Concord, NC
Default

I've used ARP and the Alper motorsports one. Got a 900rwhp nitrous vette, my "beater" 97 (540whp on one kit), and my single turbo camaro running the Alpers, no issues whatsoever on the performance side. The only thing I dont like is the smaller studs dont have a hex bit slot to tighten them into the block with, gonna use your fingers.
Old 01-20-2014 | 10:35 AM
  #78  
aknovaman's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 105
From: Hog Back, KS
Default

I know this is not a wrench thread but just FYI.

Snap on wrenches can be out of tolerance just as well as the HF ones. I have used and calibrated both . Both keep their accuracy over long term the same. At work, last week, we got 6 Snap on wrenches brand new that would not pass initial calibration specs. They were very non-linear. The new digital wrenches from snap on are actually 1% and asre dead on the $$ for accuracy. I highly recommend them.
Old 01-20-2014 | 10:37 AM
  #79  
Forcefed86's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,066
Likes: 783
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Originally Posted by aknovaman
I know this is not a wrench thread but just FYI.

Snap on wrenches can be out of tolerance just as well as the HF ones. I have used and calibrated both . Both keep their accuracy over long term the same. At work, last week, we got 6 Snap on wrenches brand new that would not pass initial calibration specs. They were very non-linear. The new digital wrenches from snap on are actually 1% and asre dead on the $$ for accuracy. I highly recommend them.
Also a good point. My Torque wrench was certified and in spec through my work.
Old 01-20-2014 | 10:49 AM
  #80  
aknovaman's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 105
From: Hog Back, KS
Default

We have a more house press that can put tension and force on parts at work. Just need to convince my boss to let me test some studs at work to see how they perform far as stretch and if the nuts or stud threads fail first. ;-)


Quick Reply: Budget/eBay head studs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.