I have a 99 frc full exhaust, boost a pump, d1sc full kit and supporting mods twin Innercooled. Should I stick with it or go with a mp112? I have a guy wnting to trade. It has the upgraded carbon jack shaft. What are your thoughts? Car makes 520 on 12 psi on a safe tune. Thanks in advance.

 

D1SC all the way.. Mp112 are too small for even an LS1 IMO. They tap out around 500hp.

 

That would be a horrible trade for you.

 

I agree

 

He's trying to get over on you. Keep the D1SC without a doubt.

 

One more for the D1...

 

Lol d1 for sure!

 

Thanks guys. I'm really wanting a top mount. Almost snagged a 3.3 whipple the other day but I called about an hour too late. I was unsure about the mp112 seemed small. Thanks again.

 

D1! Unless you would like to add a heater to your mod list!!!

 

I had a maggie on my camaro and now have a D1 ,big difference more power and less weight so much more fun driving with the D1.

 

If you like to create and a go slower go for it otherwise keep the centri.

 

Yea Mp112 chokes out quick and turns into a furnace

 

X13 on keeping the d1sc. I do love the sound of the Maggie's though.

 

Dude do not do that trade.

 

I bet he does.

 

Not going to thanks to you guys :-). As for topmount versus centrifugals in general what do you guys think pros and cons?

 

Centri pro: gas milage.... intercooler options..... blower runs cooler...makes more all out power.... bypasvslve options.....
Con... Some people dont like the look...

"Topmount" pro: looks cool
Con: heat soak.... inefficient. ... heatsoak... lack of intercooler... pumps hot air as it sits on top of your hot motor.

 

Tvs2300 or any centri blower. Only way to go

 

IMO I would go D1SC or P1SC over an mp112...

 

Well to be fair, the top mount does make instant boost, which is a pro and a con in my opinion. If your car is already pretty quick, adding that much instant torque will make you slower since it just blows the tires off at 2500rpm. But if you had a truck, with tall tires, and awd, then having all that massive torque down low would be useful, but then it would just run out of steam by 4500-5000rpm.