Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

HPTuners for boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 03:53 AM
  #161  
1970camaroRS's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 4
From: Everett, WA
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
The new 3.0 scanner is much faster. So hopefully you guys are using it.
I'm reluctant since the current version works perfectly for my needs and my configurations, custom PID's and such would have to be redone.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 09:25 AM
  #162  
mOtOrHeAd MiKe's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 51
From: Saskatchewan, Canada - where arguing "DA" is for the slow and weak...
Default

Disclaimer: I didn't read anything posted before 1 Jan 16, so much has changed since.

I have been using HP Tuners for over 5 years, started with v2.22ish, and I must say that v3.0+ made the transition of our TBSS to boost (2.5bar OS) a relative breeze. Yes there was a lot of reading and research done in advance and during but overall it was pretty seemless. The same applied when we converted the truck for FlexFuel. If you want the answers handed to you pay someone to do the work - because this option doesn't exist.

Relearning and adapting to change is just part of the process; either that or you get left behind. And I have never had an issue with customer support from the staff at HP Tuners.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 09:09 AM
  #163  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Hi Gents, it's been awhile since I participated in my own thread, but it's because of the reason I'd mentioned before. My contract keeps me away from the car. I only get to see it every other weekend, and with that, I still have to tend my wife whom I only get to see on the same basis.

Recently:
I'd downloaded/installed ver 3.2 of HPTuners since I'd heard they'd re-enabled RTT(Real Time Tuning). I then took my most recent 3 bar OLSD tune file and performed a WRITE ENTIRE. Afterwards, I fired up the engine and started the VM Scanner.
  • Gear = Neutral, RPM = 1000, KPA = 47, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 11.9
  • Gear = Neutral, RPM = 2500, KPA = 30, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 10.X
  • Gear = 1st, RPM = 1000, KPA = 55, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 13.x
  • Gear = 1st, RPM = 2000, KPA = 65, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 19.x where it would then falter and almost die
  • The PW stayed locked at 2.2 no matter what I did, no matter what the TPS or MAP values. It was as if it was only going to administer that much fuel. Now, I could flap the thottle (but only in neutral)to make it rev to 3,000 rpm and above and it would FINALLY alter the 2.2, ,but that was it.

No problem I thought, "I'll just fire up RTT and make some adjustments". Nope, I could change the VE in the applicable area to any value, large or small and it had zero effect on the A/F ration my PLX wide band was displaying.

So, realizing that the RTT was not working for unknown reasons, I went into the editor and started modifying cells there. I'd upload and re-scan. No changes. I tried thirteen different flash files before getting exasperated and setting all the VE cells from 15 to 105 to '20'. THEN it had an affect, by flicking the PW back and forth rapidly from 1.9 to 2.2 and back.

So I reached out to the internet to see if anyone else was having issues similar to mine. I found a few but nothing to fix it. Then I called a tuner buddy of mine and told him of my experience. He said that on the LS1 PCM's (0411) he'd ran into the same thing for the 2 and 3 bar SD OS(Operating systems). He said he had to go back to the 2.24 version to upload (Write Entire) the 2 and 3 bar. He also confirmed that the RTT on 3.2 has not worked for him either. I have since found 3 other tuners telling me the same thing about the 3.2 RTT for LS1. Some of them mentioned, once the 3 bar OS was installed by 2.24, they could still subsequently tune them with 3.0 and 3.2.

So I got 2.24, uninstalled version 3.2 and reinstalled version 2.24. I then took my initial tune (before all the crazy changes I'd put in trying to get it to respond), peformed a 'write entire', then fired up the engine and scanner. Right away RTT was causing the desired effect. So I then went to the histograms and modified the VE with that. Soon, the engine was running like a champ. I took her for a drive to the gas station (still need to get the refreshed front end aligned and get the car inspected). Even out of boost, it really feels powerful. Can wait to turn up the wick next time I'm home!
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 10:02 AM
  #164  
coltboostin's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 16
From: Avon, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by mightyquickz28
Hi Gents, it's been awhile since I participated in my own thread, but it's because of the reason I'd mentioned before. My contract keeps me away from the car. I only get to see it every other weekend, and with that, I still have to tend my wife whom I only get to see on the same basis.

Recently:
I'd downloaded/installed ver 3.2 of HPTuners since I'd heard they'd re-enabled RTT(Real Time Tuning). I then took my most recent 3 bar OLSD tune file and performed a WRITE ENTIRE. Afterwards, I fired up the engine and started the VM Scanner.
  • Gear = Neutral, RPM = 1000, KPA = 47, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 11.9
  • Gear = Neutral, RPM = 2500, KPA = 30, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 10.X
  • Gear = 1st, RPM = 1000, KPA = 55, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 13.x
  • Gear = 1st, RPM = 2000, KPA = 65, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 19.x where it would then falter and almost die
  • The PW stayed locked at 2.2 no matter what I did, no matter what the TPS or MAP values. It was as if it was only going to administer that much fuel. Now, I could flap the thottle (but only in neutral)to make it rev to 3,000 rpm and above and it would FINALLY alter the 2.2, ,but that was it.

No problem I thought, "I'll just fire up RTT and make some adjustments". Nope, I could change the VE in the applicable area to any value, large or small and it had zero effect on the A/F ration my PLX wide band was displaying.

So, realizing that the RTT was not working for unknown reasons, I went into the editor and started modifying cells there. I'd upload and re-scan. No changes. I tried thirteen different flash files before getting exasperated and setting all the VE cells from 15 to 105 to '20'. THEN it had an affect, by flicking the PW back and forth rapidly from 1.9 to 2.2 and back.

So I reached out to the internet to see if anyone else was having issues similar to mine. I found a few but nothing to fix it. Then I called a tuner buddy of mine and told him of my experience. He said that on the LS1 PCM's (0411) he'd ran into the same thing for the 2 and 3 bar SD OS(Operating systems). He said he had to go back to the 2.24 version to upload (Write Entire) the 2 and 3 bar. He also confirmed that the RTT on 3.2 has not worked for him either. I have since found 3 other tuners telling me the same thing about the 3.2 RTT for LS1. Some of them mentioned, once the 3 bar OS was installed by 2.24, they could still subsequently tune them with 3.0 and 3.2.

So I got 2.24, uninstalled version 3.2 and reinstalled version 2.24. I then took my initial tune (before all the crazy changes I'd put in trying to get it to respond), peformed a 'write entire', then fired up the engine and scanner. Right away RTT was causing the desired effect. So I then went to the histograms and modified the VE with that. Soon, the engine was running like a champ. I took her for a drive to the gas station (still need to get the refreshed front end aligned and get the car inspected). Even out of boost, it really feels powerful. Can wait to turn up the wick next time I'm home!

Did you call HP tuenrs for advise here? Wonder if the issue is with the software or your set up...
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 11:54 AM
  #165  
jdoyle's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 3
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by mightyquickz28
Hi Gents, it's been awhile since I participated in my own thread, but it's because of the reason I'd mentioned before. My contract keeps me away from the car. I only get to see it every other weekend, and with that, I still have to tend my wife whom I only get to see on the same basis.

Recently:
I'd downloaded/installed ver 3.2 of HPTuners since I'd heard they'd re-enabled RTT(Real Time Tuning). I then took my most recent 3 bar OLSD tune file and performed a WRITE ENTIRE. Afterwards, I fired up the engine and started the VM Scanner.
  • Gear = Neutral, RPM = 1000, KPA = 47, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 11.9
  • Gear = Neutral, RPM = 2500, KPA = 30, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 10.X
  • Gear = 1st, RPM = 1000, KPA = 55, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 13.x
  • Gear = 1st, RPM = 2000, KPA = 65, PW(Pulse Width) = 2.2, A/F ratio = 19.x where it would then falter and almost die
  • The PW stayed locked at 2.2 no matter what I did, no matter what the TPS or MAP values. It was as if it was only going to administer that much fuel. Now, I could flap the thottle (but only in neutral)to make it rev to 3,000 rpm and above and it would FINALLY alter the 2.2, ,but that was it.

No problem I thought, "I'll just fire up RTT and make some adjustments". Nope, I could change the VE in the applicable area to any value, large or small and it had zero effect on the A/F ration my PLX wide band was displaying.

So, realizing that the RTT was not working for unknown reasons, I went into the editor and started modifying cells there. I'd upload and re-scan. No changes. I tried thirteen different flash files before getting exasperated and setting all the VE cells from 15 to 105 to '20'. THEN it had an affect, by flicking the PW back and forth rapidly from 1.9 to 2.2 and back.

So I reached out to the internet to see if anyone else was having issues similar to mine. I found a few but nothing to fix it. Then I called a tuner buddy of mine and told him of my experience. He said that on the LS1 PCM's (0411) he'd ran into the same thing for the 2 and 3 bar SD OS(Operating systems). He said he had to go back to the 2.24 version to upload (Write Entire) the 2 and 3 bar. He also confirmed that the RTT on 3.2 has not worked for him either. I have since found 3 other tuners telling me the same thing about the 3.2 RTT for LS1. Some of them mentioned, once the 3 bar OS was installed by 2.24, they could still subsequently tune them with 3.0 and 3.2.

So I got 2.24, uninstalled version 3.2 and reinstalled version 2.24. I then took my initial tune (before all the crazy changes I'd put in trying to get it to respond), peformed a 'write entire', then fired up the engine and scanner. Right away RTT was causing the desired effect. So I then went to the histograms and modified the VE with that. Soon, the engine was running like a champ. I took her for a drive to the gas station (still need to get the refreshed front end aligned and get the car inspected). Even out of boost, it really feels powerful. Can wait to turn up the wick next time I'm home!
hey bud, are you still in Texas?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 12:46 PM
  #166  
Rawr256's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 747
Likes: 18
Default

I had similar issues with running HPT 3.2. Could be user error or could be a glitch on their end, from you talking with others it sounds more like a glitch they haven't addressed yet. I've been running one of the last releases of the 2.24 along with the beta of 3.1 just to have the newer features with my G8 and be able to RTT my TA. Hopefully it will be fixed in the future. After playing with the new scanner it does have its benefits but the RTT is such a nice feature for me with the TA when a change/tweak is needed with the VE. Wish they could implement it with the newer ECM's but sounds like that isn't really an option.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 04:07 PM
  #167  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Originally Posted by jdoyle
hey bud, are you still in Texas?
Yes. Richardson TX
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 04:18 PM
  #168  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Originally Posted by coltboostin
Did you call HP tuenrs for advise here? Wonder if the issue is with the software or your set up...
Yes. I sent an email with the text of my experience, my tune and a log file. After a day or two, the simply replied, " Its your tune. We can't help you. We don't have personnel to help with your tune" ( something to that effect anyway). Well, if they know something is wrong with the tune, can they not say what was wrong?

At any rate, after canvassing several other users and tuners, it does appear that for the LS1 crowd, the 3 bar OS loaded by 3.2 is not functioning correctly. One gent with a twin turbo corvette setup said he was close to just selling the car after using 3.2 and encountering what I had.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 05:14 PM
  #169  
RonSSNova's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 814
From: Portland, OR
Default

I've been tuning a car with 3bar os with no issues using 3.2
I wrote the file last year with 2.24.

Why did you choose to write entire with 3.2?

Ron
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 05:38 PM
  #170  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 12
From: Visalia, California
Default

Damn, just updated to the latest build from a 3.0.x, now you've got me concerned.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 05:47 PM
  #171  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
I've been tuning a car with 3bar os with no issues using 3.2
I wrote the file last year with 2.24.

Why did you choose to write entire with 3.2?

Ron
Hi Ron,
Believing it to possibly be a corrupt segment or two, I wanted to be sure to overwrite all segments. Since I'd had so many issues with my tune and thinking it far more likely I'd bungled something that an implementation issue, I bought a mail order tune from a sponsor and loaded it. Same.Damn.Behavior... No difference until I reloaded 2.24 and 'write entire'd it. Didn't end up even using the mail order tune.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 05:49 PM
  #172  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Originally Posted by 67Firebird455
Damn, just updated to the latest build from a 3.0.x, now you've got me concerned.
Well, you can corroborate my findings If you put in a 3bar OS using write entire and it's fubar'd, I can send you 2.24 and you can fix it.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 05:58 PM
  #173  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 12
From: Visalia, California
Default

Originally Posted by mightyquickz28
Well, you can corroborate my findings If you put in a 3bar OS using write entire and it's fubar'd, I can send you 2.24 and you can fix it.
I do, and that's what I'm afraid of. I have never used 2.24 before, so it wouldn't hurt to get it if 3.2 has some oddities. I wondered why RTT never worked in the version I had, it seems counter intuitive to release a new version that doesn't offer it. If you've got a dropbox/drive link you could fire over for 2.24 so I can leech it, that'd be awesome man.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 07:04 PM
  #174  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Can you access this? https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8L...w?usp=drivesdk
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2016 | 11:35 PM
  #175  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 12
From: Visalia, California
Default

Originally Posted by mightyquickz28
Sure can man. Thank you sir. I'm going to try to test 3.2 out with my 3 bar os and see what happens.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2016 | 12:42 AM
  #176  
67Firebird455's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 12
From: Visalia, California
Default

Damn, my RTT is working fine on mine on the new 3.2 release I just installed. Just changed my VE at 45kPa / .8 (idles at 750) and it richened it up at idle when I edited that box with a higher number. Leaned back out when I reduced the number.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2016 | 06:33 AM
  #177  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Glad to hear it whatever we can do to make these cars that we love run great is good for me. Are you using a 0411 or a P59 PCM?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2016 | 08:04 AM
  #178  
Cyrperformance's Avatar
TECH Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Not sure if this is of any help but, I had several issues when going to the 3.2 also. Did recieved a quick reply of it is your file. Uninstalled and reinstalled from my customer center and most of the problems were fixed. Only problem I had left was the scanner would freeze after roughly one minute of recording. After a week or so I wrote in again with this issue and recieved the download the latest version, it has been fixed. Apparently they release a new version almost daily with bug fixes that are reported. So far so good after that.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2016 | 08:27 AM
  #179  
mightyquickz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 133
From: East Chatham, New York
Default

Aha.. that's great to hear, that they are addressing issues. As long as I can tune the car, I'm happy. Thanks for the feedback on your experience!

Originally Posted by Cyrperformance
Not sure if this is of any help but, I had several issues when going to the 3.2 also. Did recieved a quick reply of it is your file. Uninstalled and reinstalled from my customer center and most of the problems were fixed. Only problem I had left was the scanner would freeze after roughly one minute of recording. After a week or so I wrote in again with this issue and recieved the download the latest version, it has been fixed. Apparently they release a new version almost daily with bug fixes that are reported. So far so good after that.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2016 | 09:12 AM
  #180  
Cyrperformance's Avatar
TECH Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

No problem. Hope it works out, 3.2 scanner has nice functions that make quite a bit of difference in the ease of use department
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE