Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

turbo 4.8 compression ?s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2015, 10:52 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
lsx68firstgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MI
Posts: 137
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default turbo 4.8 compression ?s

I have a low mile 4.8 with a vsracing 7875 turbo. Its a L20 motor with 8.8 compression with 243 heads and I am worried it will be a dog out of boost. I have a 4l80e with 4.11 gears which will be swapped for 3.31 gears when funds permit. The pistons have valve reliefs and I have a set of gen 4 flat top pistons and rods laying around and was wondering if they would raise the compression enough to be worth it. Thanks for any help.
Old 04-27-2015, 11:48 AM
  #2  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,986
Received 746 Likes on 547 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lsx68firstgen
I have a low mile 4.8 with a vsracing 7875 turbo. Its a L20 motor with 8.8 compression with 243 heads and I am worried it will be a dog out of boost. I have a 4l80e with 4.11 gears which will be swapped for 3.31 gears when funds permit. The pistons have valve reliefs and I have a set of gen 4 flat top pistons and rods laying around and was wondering if they would raise the compression enough to be worth it. Thanks for any help.
Everyone's definition of "dog out of boost" is different. A 4.8 isn't a power house NA, so it's going to feel like a turd out of boost if you don't make radical changes. Tiny bump in compression won't even be noticeable IMO. Buy a custom cam setup to give you a healthy bump in DCR if out of boost response is a big deal to you. Loose converter can also make a big difference. IMO leave it alone and make up for the lower CR with boost, converter, cam. The trick is to light the turbo off as quickly as possible. That way you'll spend very little time "out of boost". PTC 9.5 with the 17 blade stator worked really well on my 8.6:1 5.3. Plenty of slip down low and still coupled hard up top.
Old 04-27-2015, 01:29 PM
  #3  
Launching!
 
dirty_old_chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That 4.8 isn't gonna want to swallow a cam that requires valve reliefs. If you want to bump up compression a bit, I would suggest looking for some 862 heads. The cam should stay conservative. I would suggest an intake closing event no later than 35-36 degrees. Even with the stock cam, those engines don't want to do much under 2500-3000 rpm. The faster you can get that cam making torque, the earlier that turbo will spool.
Old 04-29-2015, 09:02 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
lsx68firstgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MI
Posts: 137
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well I picked up a tick stage 3 turbo 223/227 cam. Converter is a billet circle d 3200. Thanks for th info.
Old 05-04-2015, 08:52 AM
  #5  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I would of recommended the Stage 2 4.8/5.3 cam at the largest and only if you just absolutely have to hear the cam at idle. If you want the best performance and can live with the idle that comes with it, I'd of recommended the Stage 1 4.8/5.3 camshaft.

I reserve the Stage 3 being used in 4.8's for all out racing applications with S480 or larger turbochargers, trans brakes and 4000+ RPM stall converters.

It will probably be even doggier out of boost with the Stage 3 cam than it would of been with the stock cam. The Stage 1 cam would of really helped get it to spool quicker.
Old 05-04-2015, 09:39 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 186 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

I've got a set of 862 heads. If you're interested, PM me.
Old 05-21-2015, 10:42 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
lsx68firstgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MI
Posts: 137
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
I would of recommended the Stage 2 4.8/5.3 cam at the largest and only if you just absolutely have to hear the cam at idle. If you want the best performance and can live with the idle that comes with it, I'd of recommended the Stage 1 4.8/5.3 camshaft.

I reserve the Stage 3 being used in 4.8's for all out racing applications with S480 or larger turbochargers, trans brakes and 4000+ RPM stall converters.

It will probably be even doggier out of boost with the Stage 3 cam than it would of been with the stock cam. The Stage 1 cam would of really helped get it to spool quicker.
ah I see. only reason I went with it is because a local guy with a 5.3 bone stock has a btr cam with very similar cam specs to the stage 3 but a little more aggressive and it runs great. But like you said, its a all out track car. But I figured since I don't mind aggressive cams at all and since I don't have power breaks it wouldn't be to much of an issue. I do want an aggressive idle as im not looking to push it to its limit but at the same time I don't want it to impact power in a bad way. Thanks for the info.
Old 05-21-2015, 10:54 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
lsx68firstgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MI
Posts: 137
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Everyone's definition of "dog out of boost" is different. A 4.8 isn't a power house NA, so it's going to feel like a turd out of boost if you don't make radical changes. Tiny bump in compression won't even be noticeable IMO. Buy a custom cam setup to give you a healthy bump in DCR if out of boost response is a big deal to you. Loose converter can also make a big difference. IMO leave it alone and make up for the lower CR with boost, converter, cam. The trick is to light the turbo off as quickly as possible. That way you'll spend very little time "out of boost". PTC 9.5 with the 17 blade stator worked really well on my 8.6:1 5.3. Plenty of slip down low and still coupled hard up top.
Thanks for the info. Im now questioning what I should do cam wise after martin chimed in. Back to the drawing board I guess haha. Should of listened to people more educated then just judging off anothers car.
Old 05-22-2015, 07:04 AM
  #9  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,986
Received 746 Likes on 547 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lsx68firstgen
Thanks for the info. Im now questioning what I should do cam wise after martin chimed in. Back to the drawing board I guess haha. Should of listened to people more educated then just judging off anothers car.
Recently put together a turbo 4.8. 500HP and a mean aggressive idle where the goals. I went with the edelbrock 2215 cam. It's a very low lift design has the aggressive idle while maintaining a -2 overlap at .050. So it shouldn't be too horrible for mild boost. Cam was $312.

Old 05-22-2015, 11:26 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
lsx68firstgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MI
Posts: 137
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Recently put together a turbo 4.8. 500HP and a mean aggressive idle where the goals. I went with the edelbrock 2215 cam. It's a very low lift design has the aggressive idle while maintaining a -2 overlap at .050. So it shouldn't be too horrible for mild boost. Cam was $312.

92 s10 4.8 swap edelbrock 2215 cam - YouTube
That s10 sounds mean! Not that I want a nasty idle I just don't want a "stock" sounding cam. The car it's going in has big and little tires with a 4" cowl hood so I just want it to sound like it looks to a certain extent. How well do you think this cam would work in a 6.0?
Old 05-22-2015, 11:43 AM
  #11  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,986
Received 746 Likes on 547 Posts

Default

For a low boost 500-600HP goal I think it would work just fine on a 6.0.

Come up with a power goal and a desired RPM range. I’m sure Martin could hook you up with something a little more ideal. I literally just wanted to show boat this build around to sell it. The crowd I’m targeting doesn’t’ care about an ideal cam… they just want it to sound mean! My 8 second car idles like a minivan at 750RPM
Old 05-22-2015, 12:00 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
lsx68firstgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MI
Posts: 137
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

At least 600 whp shifting at 6500. The last setup had 500 whp so with a turbo I want a healthy gain. Only reason I ask about the 6.0 is I may know of one I can get.
Old 05-22-2015, 12:19 PM
  #13  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,986
Received 746 Likes on 547 Posts

Default

4.8’s are gutless as it is. Easiest to get rid of that with a loose converter and boost. Then cam it for the top end. 6500 is on the low side IMO for a 4.8. Seems like guys are buzzing them to 7k+ pretty easy. Low RPM and big boost don’t seem to get along with the SBE LS engines. I always thought limiting RPM was the way to go as well, but with the LS stuff I don’t think your doing yourself any favors... especially with a 4.8.

6.0 has a lot more grunt down low. IMO you’d build that setup opposite. Tight converter, less rpm, “small” cam.

This guy runs his 4.8 up to 7500rpm… with a lot of converter slip. Not optimal with ls6 cam and factory intake, but the engine doesn’t seem to mind.

$220 Gt45 turbo maxed out at 17lbs...

Old 05-22-2015, 01:15 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
lsx68firstgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: MI
Posts: 137
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Going with a different motor. Thanks for all the info .
Old 05-23-2015, 05:01 AM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Mongoose350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by lsx68firstgen
Going with a different motor. Thanks for all the info .
FYI before you buy the 6.0. You're kind of doing the same thing as before, only in a differant way. That 78/75 is going to max out pretty fast on the larger 6.0 then it would on the 4.8. It should make 700whp, but don't expect much more. That may seem like plenty to you now but sooner or later, you're going to want more and that will mean buying another turbo. Much more expensive than a JY motor. A 4.8 might not have much grunt down low, but your an auto so that's easily delt with, and that cheap 78/75 will make much more on the smaller motor.

Just don't get impatient and ask around. Know what you want and be willing to make nessecary sacrifices, because nothing is going to excel at everything. It seems like your looking at this from a NA perspective but turbos are a differant animal. I don't think a little soft at low rpm is going to matter much to you at 7000+RPM and 800+whp.

Also, the 4.8's are popular because the short stroke and small bore allows them to take a ton of boost absolutely stock. Doing nothing but throwing in some ARP rod bolts and 20lbs is cake walk, with a good tune of course.

I remember watching this build. This guy ment to get a 5.3 but the JY gave him a 4.8 by mistake. So he said **** it and used it, untouched bottom end.

Last edited by Mongoose350; 05-23-2015 at 05:15 AM.
Old 06-02-2015, 01:23 PM
  #16  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,986
Received 746 Likes on 547 Posts

Default

2215 idle on open down pipe 750-800 RPM. 2006 4.8.




Quick Reply: turbo 4.8 compression ?s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.