Wideband and ECU discrepancy
Wideband and ECU discrepancy Has anyone ever experienced a discrepancy between your wideband gauge and what shows up on a datalog or laptop "dashboard?" I don't have my ride running yet, but wondering of it happens and then which one you "believe" or go with. Seems they should all be really close as they read and calculate from lambda. Let me know. BTW, I'll be running Holley hp and an AEM 30-4110 wideband. Thanks in advance.
Why not run the wideband that's for the HP system? The widebands for the Holley efi are really good weather you have the Bosch, or the ntk.
I will tell you that aem widebands are almost always off. Usually in the bad way, like reading richer then what it actually is. I have one on my arm series 2 on my 240, and while chucking it against a know good reading sensor it was about .4 richer then the known good reading wideband. But I can adjust all of that to make it ready right in my ems.
Turbo hayabusas that come to my shop with them again always read wrong.
Just use the Holley sensors and calibrations, you'll be fine.
I will tell you that aem widebands are almost always off. Usually in the bad way, like reading richer then what it actually is. I have one on my arm series 2 on my 240, and while chucking it against a know good reading sensor it was about .4 richer then the known good reading wideband. But I can adjust all of that to make it ready right in my ems.
Turbo hayabusas that come to my shop with them again always read wrong.
Just use the Holley sensors and calibrations, you'll be fine.
I was going to use the AEM mainly to be able to watch a gauge while driving. No way to watch a gauge using the Holley from what I understand. Unless I use a tablet, which I'm trying to avoid. Any way to rescale the AEM to match what the Holley is reading? Not sure.
You can't rescale the gauge it's self, you would have to change it in the Holley. Don't know how to do that.
Instead of loading up on gauges, why not buy the 3.5" Holley efi touch screen display. Is $230. You can do all your tuning through it if you want. I have one, my Main reason for getting it is because it displays up to 4 sensors at once. So I have afr, ethanol content, fuel pressure and boost. And you can set the screen to flash any color you want for a shift light.
Instead of loading up on gauges, why not buy the 3.5" Holley efi touch screen display. Is $230. You can do all your tuning through it if you want. I have one, my Main reason for getting it is because it displays up to 4 sensors at once. So I have afr, ethanol content, fuel pressure and boost. And you can set the screen to flash any color you want for a shift light.
Trending Topics
The sensors are linear and usually will give you a voltage reading for minimum and maximum AFR. Then you enter that into your ecu and it will usually match the gauge. That's how my AEM EMS and Microsquirt setups did it anyway. I'd guess the Holley ECU has something similar? Pretty **** poor deal if you have to run the holley sensor with the holley ECU.
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo The sensors are linear and usually will give you a voltage reading for minimum and maximum AFR. Then you enter that into your ecu and it will usually match the gauge. That's how my AEM EMS and Microsquirt setups did it anyway. I'd guess the Holley ECU has something similar? Pretty **** poor deal if you have to run the holley sensor with the holley ECU.
I guess you don't "have to" run the Holley sensor, but I know for sure when you buy an ecu with the ls harness it comes with a wideband all wired and ready to go. So why wouldn't you? But his case was for watching afrs without a lap top hooked up. A hefi canbus gauge, or screen is the way to go.
Did a little reading on the touch screen. I really like how you can watch everything and also load any tune off the SD card. That could be very advantageous as well. Drive around on one tune, then switch over once at the track or in a good "test spot." Couldn't find much on changing the tune though, as far as seeing a spark or AFR map and making changes.
Man this was a long *** time ago, as a matter of fact, I haven't tuned a stock ecu in probably 3 years. But I remember on my truck, I had my AEM Wideband feeding one of the inputs on the HPTuners interface and there was a slight difference. This was actually a big topic back then (voltage offsets and/or ground issues). I remember the subject being discussed extensively on the HPTuners forum. You had to go in and adjust the formula that converted the voltage output of the wideband to the O2 numbers seen by the tuners interface.
9 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
Has anyone ever experienced a discrepancy between your wideband gauge and what shows up on a datalog or laptop "dashboard?" I don't have my ride running yet, but wondering of it happens and then which one you "believe" or go with. Seems they should all be really close as they read and calculate from lambda. Let me know. BTW, I'll be running Holley hp and an AEM 30-4110 wideband. Thanks in advance.
If you're using analogue voltage outputs then there will always be the potential for discrepancies.
What the wideband controller actually calculates as lambda or other values and then outputs as an analogue voltage may not always be exactly what whatever display sees after all wiring, connectors etc are taken into account
As much as I dont like Innovate's stuff, it is handy that you can program their outputs so they're easy to test.
ie flatline the output at 1.0v and see if 1.0v is actually displayed on whatever the receiving device is.
same for 2, 3, 4, 5v.
That way you know if there are any wiring issues or offsets that need looked into.
or if the data is fed via a datastream, serial, CAN etc then you wouldnt have any voltages to worry about
So what about all the MS guys that run an AEM gauge/wideband to the ecu and have nothing to compare it to? Are they all off? I'd think it couldn't be much or they be hurting engines left and right.
9 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
But unless you have some means of verification then there is either assumption or trust involved.....if of course you deem the actual wideband reading to be 100% accurate in the first place.
The gauge will be calibrated to the sensor it was meant for right out of the box. I'd always try to make the ECU match the gauge reading... Depending on how clean your 5v source is to your gauge or your ecu the readings may vary a tad. Especially as your voltage jumps around when charging/driving.
The gauge will be calibrated to the sensor it was meant for right out of the box. I'd always try to make the ECU match the gauge reading... Depending on how clean your 5v source is to your gauge or your ecu the readings may vary a tad. Especially as your voltage jumps around when charging/driving.
9 Second Club
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 185
From: Norn Iron
All being equal all displays should be reading the same values at all times.
How the remote device is fed the information is key. Analogue voltages carry the biggest risk of differences, information transmitted via some sort of datastream there should be a good chance of accuracy.
A lot of the issues arent down to the devices themselves, just the wiring, connections, grounds etc etc.
That said, I flatlined the output of an MTX-L ages ago for testing into a Motec...and there were 0.5v variations ! The readings didnt seem so bad when the engine was running as MTX gauge did seem pretty close to the values seen on the Motec with the calibration I used and I wasnt using the analogue into the Motec for any actual tuning anyway, so it wasnt a big deal.
Never did look into whether the MTX's output was unstable or whether it was something at the Motec/wiring end that wasnt happy.