Turbo choice
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Stafford,va
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo choice
Ok so im running a lc9 5.3 and im trying to figure out what turbo to go with im thinking of doing twin precision 6062's because I already have them or if I should do a single precision 76mm. Any advice would be helpful im trying to get to atleast 900hp!
#2
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
more depends if u want a twin setup or single I guess? shouldn't have too much turbo lag either way. Im throwing twin 70mm magnum turbos on a 5.3 and I shouldn't have that much of a lag issue as long as I get a good cam and tune. A lot of it is in tuning now adays.
#3
Unless you just have money to throw away, I would ditch the twins concept. And just go with the single precision 7675. It will make 900rwhp by itself. And not have all the hassle of all the extras that come with twins.
#4
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude has a point, my headache got far worse when I bought this kit instead of getting the on3 kit..like the fact I spent a extra 1k on it over a brand new on3 kit, and I gotta relocate my battery, oil feed and drain lines..yada...yada...might sell this kit and go back to my original idea but I bought this kit to keep my exhaust I have on the car so idk.
#5
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Stafford,va
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK this is going in a gen3 Camaro back half car so I have a lot of room to work with but I was leaning towards doing a single turbo but the going with a big single turbo is really expensive upwards ok 4k for just the turbo for the right turbo and i wasn't sure If running big turbo will cause a lot of lag
#6
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK this is going in a gen3 Camaro back half car so I have a lot of room to work with but I was leaning towards doing a single turbo but the going with a big single turbo is really expensive upwards ok 4k for just the turbo for the right turbo and i wasn't sure If running big turbo will cause a lot of lag
Trending Topics
#9
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Stafford,va
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wanna do a single turbo but I don't want the lag but but I cant have it not getting in boost at high rpm's because of the gear that's in the car so I trying to find a happy medium
#10
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 76mm turbo is fine, turbo lag is more in tunes now than actual size unless you go stupid big like..90+ then cubes will matter but short of like 85mm or bigger lag is more tune based than size based.
#11
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
OK this is going in a gen3 Camaro back half car so I have a lot of room to work with but I was leaning towards doing a single turbo but the going with a big single turbo is really expensive upwards ok 4k for just the turbo for the right turbo and i wasn't sure If running big turbo will cause a lot of lag
#13
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Id do this you just have to move stuff in the engine bay to make it work like me, if u want to run filters you have to move the battery and other stupid stuff so the filters fit. Unless your kit is rear mounted in which case nice! wish mine was lol save me a ton of hassle....
#14
9 Second Club
Greddy make some very compact foam filters, or K&N do some very small ones too.
Neither are ideal, but IMO even a poor filter is better than none at all as long as it doesnt massively affect performance.
Although wouldnt say the Greddy ones seem to filter that well either...but still better than nothing or a piece of **** screen.
Neither are ideal, but IMO even a poor filter is better than none at all as long as it doesnt massively affect performance.
Although wouldnt say the Greddy ones seem to filter that well either...but still better than nothing or a piece of **** screen.
#15
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Greddy make some very compact foam filters, or K&N do some very small ones too.
Neither are ideal, but IMO even a poor filter is better than none at all as long as it doesnt massively affect performance.
Although wouldnt say the Greddy ones seem to filter that well either...but still better than nothing or a piece of **** screen.
Neither are ideal, but IMO even a poor filter is better than none at all as long as it doesnt massively affect performance.
Although wouldnt say the Greddy ones seem to filter that well either...but still better than nothing or a piece of **** screen.
#16
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Stafford,va
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the good thing is my fuel cell and battery is already in the back but the 6062's with a bigger hot sides on them should be good since I have them and they are fairly new they only have about 10 passes on on one and the other one is still in the box but the big reason I don't want to run twin its more money and everything has to be done twice 2 oil feeds 2 oil drains 2 wastegate 2 dump tubes and so on so I think a single will be a lot easier to work with! I think with rods, pistons, good heads and cam with the right turbo should put me in the 9's what do you all think!
#17
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the good thing is my fuel cell and battery is already in the back but the 6062's with a bigger hot sides on them should be good since I have them and they are fairly new they only have about 10 passes on on one and the other one is still in the box but the big reason I don't want to run twin its more money and everything has to be done twice 2 oil feeds 2 oil drains 2 wastegate 2 dump tubes and so on so I think a single will be a lot easier to work with! I think with rods, pistons, good heads and cam with the right turbo should put me in the 9's what do you all think!
#18
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Stafford,va
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok the motor im running is a lc9 aluminum 5.3 and with me in the car its 3300pnds tubbed in the rear with a 14point cage and my power goals I want to be around 850 900 area and it has a 33in tire on it what do u think with this setup could I break into the 9's
#19
9 Second Club
Well the good thing is my fuel cell and battery is already in the back but the 6062's with a bigger hot sides on them should be good since I have them and they are fairly new they only have about 10 passes on on one and the other one is still in the box but the big reason I don't want to run twin its more money and everything has to be done twice 2 oil feeds 2 oil drains 2 wastegate 2 dump tubes and so on so I think a single will be a lot easier to work with! I think with rods, pistons, good heads and cam with the right turbo should put me in the 9's what do you all think!
It really isnt a hard decision to make.
#20
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Stafford,va
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are right its not as hard as im making it seem but that's why im trying to get advice the greatest forum of ppl who knows there stuff I have a goal set of where I want to be and if twins is the best way to get to my goal that the way I will go but if I can get it done with a single that would be better Im trying to get to where you are Stevie im wanna get to that single digits club!