5.3L w/ 317?
Don't get me wrong I understand that 317 heads aren't necessarily the best choice but they seem to be pretty readily available for about $250 and I'm looking for something that has a little bit better of a flow rate and larger valves. Port and polishing the 862 that I have would seem kind of dumb and a waste of money. Any other suggestions would be highly welcome I'm kind of stumped and I don't want to spend $1,000 for one head from trick flow
Last edited by Forcefed86; Mar 2, 2017 at 06:16 PM.
Still think it would be enough of a pig to warrant 4.8 flat top pistons or 243 heads?
I've got all the above and am really torn about it since the car sees only street time and very rarely ever sees a track.
I wouldnt run the compression that low with a manual. U really need a converter and trans brake to help build boost when u dont make much power NA
Last edited by Forcefed86; Mar 2, 2017 at 07:43 PM.
CX 76s arent a great choice IMO. The turbine wheels are too small compared to the comp wheel. They will be lazy. Look at the 72/68 rev 9 turbos. Or the gt3582s for really quick spool depending on the power u want. Both are cheap.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
2 of these would be nice and give you room to grow on once you pop the gen3 engine.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rev9-TX-72-6...RVtqBn&vxp=mtr
2 of these would be nice and give you room to grow on once you pop the gen3 engine.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rev9-TX-72-6...RVtqBn&vxp=mtr
Ideally you want the exhaust wheel and compressor wheel similar in size. With twins on a 5.3 at mild RPM... .68 housings will provide better response and is about as small as your gonna get in cheap china T4 turbos with exhaust wheels large enough for a an LS.
Ideally you want the exhaust wheel and compressor wheel similar in size. With twins on a 5.3 at mild RPM... .68 housings will provide better response and is about as small as your gonna get in cheap china T4 turbos with exhaust wheels large enough for a an LS.
8.6:1 VS 9.1:1 Won’t give you 5% increase in NA power. 1 full point usually gives closer to 4%. .5 bump is like 2% and not worth farting with IMO.
With a like rotating assy, a 6.0 is actually weaker than a 5.3. The meat between the cylinders isn’t as thick and tends to eventually split at big power levels. Especially if the 6.0 block is bored/stroked.
You really don’t need a forged bottom for 700hp. Pick up a 2005+ 5.3, gap the rings and add tons of boost. The 317 head is fine, but also not necessary for 700ish hp. You can easily meet that goal and more with the small valve castings. You can also look for gen4 rods/pistons (ebay, ls1tech classifieds, etc) and drop them in the engine you have now.
I ran a bone stock 2006 4.8 with a small 212/212 @112 .56x lift cam. Small valve heads, untouched. And went 9.01 @ 151 on 19lbs of boost. (s476 t4). Depending on your chassis weight, gearing, and tune up… I’m pretty confident I could make a gen3 low compression SBE 5.3 last at 700hp for a long time if that’s your goal. Going by weight and trap I was over 700hp all season. Lower to mid 800 range when I turned it up and went 8’s. That’s with a pretty light 2800lb car. (+200lb driver).
If you build the turbo kit correctly with small 2” piping, correct torque converter good flowing IC core, decent intake manifold (stock truck is great), and proper cam…. 8.6:1 is not “too low” in my experience. Should be able to light it off easy and you’ll have a ton of extra cushion in the tune. Great for a first time turbo build.
8.6:1 VS 9.1:1 Won’t give you 5% increase in NA power. 1 full point usually gives closer to 4%. .5 bump is like 2% and not worth farting with IMO.
With a like rotating assy, a 6.0 is actually weaker than a 5.3. The meat between the cylinders isn’t as thick and tends to eventually split at big power levels. Especially if the 6.0 block is bored/stroked.
You really don’t need a forged bottom for 700hp. Pick up a 2005+ 5.3, gap the rings and add tons of boost. The 317 head is fine, but also not necessary for 700ish hp. You can easily meet that goal and more with the small valve castings. You can also look for gen4 rods/pistons (ebay, ls1tech classifieds, etc) and drop them in the engine you have now.
I ran a bone stock 2006 4.8 with a small 212/212 @112 .56x lift cam. Small valve heads, untouched. And went 9.01 @ 151 on 19lbs of boost. (s476 t4). Depending on your chassis weight, gearing, and tune up… I’m pretty confident I could make a gen3 low compression SBE 5.3 last at 700hp for a long time if that’s your goal. Going by weight and trap I was over 700hp all season. Lower to mid 800 range when I turned it up and went 8’s. That’s with a pretty light 2800lb car. (+200lb driver).
If you build the turbo kit correctly with small 2” piping, correct torque converter good flowing IC core, decent intake manifold (stock truck is great), and proper cam…. 8.6:1 is not “too low” in my experience. Should be able to light it off easy and you’ll have a ton of extra cushion in the tune. Great for a first time turbo build.
Youve been a great help man
I scored a set of gen 4 rods and flat top 5.3's off here, so I figured with 317 heads the comp. wouldn't be to far off, and I would have a little more power our of boost. So far I haven't needed it, lol. But the flat tops gave me the option of the 317 heads, but I understand the boost can make it up if needed, lol.
I scored a set of gen 4 rods and flat top 5.3's off here, so I figured with 317 heads the comp. wouldn't be to far off, and I would have a little more power our of boost. So far I haven't needed it, lol. But the flat tops gave me the option of the 317 heads, but I understand the boost can make it up if needed, lol.
If I remember correctly when adding those flat top pistons it brings your compression up to about 10.1:1. I'm not too worried about the compression as much as I'm wanting to have better flowing heads and bigger valves without spending thousands of dollars trying to port and polish the casting 862 that come with mine







