Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

t4 borg s475 power on 5.3 or 4.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2017, 02:26 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (490)
 
one fast zo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 791
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default t4 borg s475 power on 5.3 or 4.8

Ok so I did some work for a guy and was given a S475 T4 turbo with divided housing. It has a 74.5 mm comp wheel and a 83mm exhaust wheel with a 1.00ar and a t4 flange. So will this work well with a small ci 5.3 /4.8 engine? What can it make for boost and power. This might go on a auto 2000 camaro. Any good advise is helpful. As most of you know i'm a big ci Nitrous guy.
Old 04-06-2017, 03:05 PM
  #2  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Will work fine. Should be able to make 900 crank with that unit if it's setup right on either of those engines.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 04-07-2017 at 12:15 PM.
Old 04-06-2017, 05:11 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (490)
 
one fast zo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 791
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So no problem that it has a divided housing with a small 1.00ar and a t4 flange?
Do you really think it could make 750whp?

Last edited by one fast zo6; 04-06-2017 at 05:56 PM.
Old 04-06-2017, 05:44 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
94heritage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Its made over 750 whp hundreds of times
Old 04-06-2017, 05:53 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (490)
 
one fast zo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 791
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I thought was with AR of 1.25 or 1.32 with a t6 flange?
Old 04-06-2017, 08:35 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
94heritage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

No several people have done it with the standard 1.10 housing most of them come with. I seriously doubt a 1.0 housing is going to choke it that much more than the 1.10 or even the 1.24. The 83 turbine will be your limiting factor. But for 750 whp it will flow more than enough air. Regardless of housing size.
Old 04-06-2017, 08:57 PM
  #7  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

People have made more than 750 wheel with turbos that have an even smaller turbine.

Not all housings with the same A/R are equal. You can effectively double the housing size and keep the same A/R if done right, since it is a ratio and not a measurement.

My S475 with a 1.10 A/R T4 was making huge power at 26-28 PSI on a 5.3.
I had them upgrade me to a billet 80mm and they sent it back with a smaller 1.00 A/R turbine. I bet I would still have no issues making 800whp. If I want more, its $150 to swap to the 1.25 A/R.
Old 04-07-2017, 10:39 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I love my S475/T4/1.10AR on my low compression 4.8. It freaking hauls *** now that a buddy has helped me dial in my tune. About to get my alky control kit going and tune above 16psi. These little motors love RPM, and they love boost. I wouldn't be stressed over the 1.00AR housing to be honest.
Old 04-07-2017, 10:49 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
2muchboostNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@67....what kind of low compression are you running on the 4.8?
Old 04-08-2017, 08:15 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2muchboostNY
@67....what kind of low compression are you running on the 4.8?
Whatever low DCR I've got with the LS6 cam, 317s on top of this 4.8. Even 14* timing and almost 17psi, 11.0-11.2AFR on straight 91 in 3rd gear the plugs look good and it loves it.
Old 04-09-2017, 09:28 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
2muchboostNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice...I somehow completely missed your build specs in your sig lol.
Old 02-15-2018, 10:02 AM
  #12  
Teching In
 
Buschlight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Da UP , MI
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 94heritage
No several people have done it with the standard 1.10 housing most of them come with. I seriously doubt a 1.0 housing is going to choke it that much more than the 1.10 or even the 1.24. The 83 turbine will be your limiting factor. But for 750 whp it will flow more than enough air. Regardless of housing size.


Anyone in here try the 83mm t6 s475 on a merged set up? Wondering how it would behave on something like the hooker turbo manifold kit. I' on the fence t6 83 or t4 83
Old 02-15-2018, 10:19 AM
  #13  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buschlight
Anyone in here try the 83mm t6 s475 on a merged set up? Wondering how it would behave on something like the hooker turbo manifold kit. I' on the fence t6 83 or t4 83
It'll behave like a turbo...

Most people can't tell the difference between merged vs open.
Old 02-15-2018, 10:38 AM
  #14  
Teching In
 
Buschlight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Da UP , MI
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Joe. But I'm not sure if what I wants going to be a t6 or a t4. Cars mainly going to be a street car. The t6 is cheaper too.
Old 02-15-2018, 10:51 AM
  #15  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Twin scroll is designed for a twin scroll manifold. Which you won’t have, so no advantage to go that way… no real disadvantage either if it’s cheaper.

IMO T4 is for smaller engines or twins. T6 housing is what you want on any of the LS stuff. (even the 4.8) I started with the 1.10 T4… then went to the 1.25, Then went with the larger 87/96 wheel in my 1.25 T4… Finally went to 1.32 T6 and wish I would have started with the T6…

More power, less back pressure, and it spools within a couple hundred RPM of the T4. Aside from space constraints… I don’t see why anyone would want a T4 on a V8. I’m looking at the 1.58 T6 housing now… Lag is *mostly* tune and part combo related… My JY 4.8 will spool the T6 S480 just fine.
Old 02-15-2018, 10:56 AM
  #16  
Teching In
 
Buschlight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Da UP , MI
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a t6 1.32ar 96mm s475.. but I was thinking the t6 1.10 83 would be a lot more suitable for a set up like that
Old 02-15-2018, 10:59 AM
  #17  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Keep what you have… build the combo to spool it the way you want.
Old 02-15-2018, 08:18 PM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
gametech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockbridge GA
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Twin scroll is designed for a twin scroll manifold. Which you won’t have, so no advantage to go that way… no real disadvantage either if it’s cheaper.

IMO T4 is for smaller engines or twins. T6 housing is what you want on any of the LS stuff. (even the 4.8) I started with the 1.10 T4… then went to the 1.25, Then went with the larger 87/96 wheel in my 1.25 T4… Finally went to 1.32 T6 and wish I would have started with the T6…

More power, less back pressure, and it spools within a couple hundred RPM of the T4. Aside from space constraints… I don’t see why anyone would want a T4 on a V8. I’m looking at the 1.58 T6 housing now… Lag is *mostly* tune and part combo related… My JY 4.8 will spool the T6 S480 just fine.
One key statement you made. Space constraints. A T6 eats up a bit of real estate in a street car. Anytime I see a guy say "mostly street" car, I think if you can do rolling highway burnouts with T4 power, maybe you should go with the easier packaging.
Old 02-15-2018, 10:01 PM
  #19  
Teching In
 
Buschlight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Da UP , MI
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You make a good point but I happen to have a lot of room!
Old 02-16-2018, 08:43 AM
  #20  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,856
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

The compressor housings are the largest part and they are the same size.

The T6 housing may have been a .75” larger all around than the T4. I could see how routing a 5” downpipe could be very difficult in a tight spot though. With the LJMS adaptors they have now, dropping it down to 4” is a bolt on affair.

I was so tight on space I had to cut off the huge exhaust flange and weld on 4” Vband to make it work on my car. This literally let me drop in place of my old T4 S400 setup. Same exhaust and all. Just cut off with a sawzall and welded an ebay 4” Vband on it with a mig welder.


Quick Reply: t4 borg s475 power on 5.3 or 4.8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.