Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Smallest twin for 5.7 ls1 swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2019 | 02:26 PM
  #221  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by panda240ss
sounds like you're still umad?
Sounds like you're still dumb

Originally Posted by ddnspider
That ITB was probably more than my turbo kit!
Well comprehension classes are probably cheaper to. You need those the most.

Originally Posted by islander033
When Robz was selling his vette, he admitted it was a light weight race car and wasn't streetable.

Pretty hard to be street when you have no alt... lol
That car as many are was in several different configurations.

Originally Posted by JoeNova
I just ordered parts to do another quick and dirty sub-$1000 twin setup.

I'll make sure I post pictures, a parts list, and a final cost when done.
Then Hio can see how much power he can make N/A on the exact same budget.

Spoiler: I win.
You have 2hrs to get it done. Pulled in shop to backed put and tuned ready to race.

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
To be fair I can use name brand stuff and still do a turbo setup cheaper then any sort of decently powerful NA car.

Lets make a low effort list with minimal fabrication using name brand parts:

Holley turbo manifolds - $470
Holley Crossover - $212
Precision 66 Wastegate - $510
Tial bov $260
Treadstone intercooler - $315
Borg S480 - $1200
Box of silicone couplers, fittings, and tubing as needed, call it $500 to cover it all.

There ya got about $3500 which compared to any NA setup is cheap! Lots of guys spend $3k on heads alone, not to mention all the other trinkets to milk out small gains on NA builds.

I could do a twin turbo setup as well. AGP cast turbo adapters are $500 and bolt to stock manifolds and have flanges for turbo and wastegate. Two 40mm gates same cost as one 66, a pair of 62mm turbos same as S480 basically, a dual inlet intercooler. Really a wash either way you wanna do it to easily make double what an NA build would make at even twice the budget.

But like you said plenty of budget stuff to do it substantially cheaper! So its not even a comparison to an NA build.
I'm not gonna have $3500 in my engine. No reason to spend 3k on heads to me. I certainly ain't gonna .

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
Yes, only way I could make it sort of fair! But I have done similar builds with flowtech, xs-power, huronspeed, etc.. manifolds and with many of those same parts its an easy path to 1000+hp. Considering the NA builds are barely breaking 500hp I know which route I would take. Both setups T6 single and twins I've seen 150mph on gate and faster with boost adjusted from the drivers seat, so that's why I call 130MPH slow as a turbo car literally cant even go that slow. Even my baby Chinese T4 single trapped 145MPH and that's about as small as a turbo as I'd ever run on anything, plus timing was in the dirt and it wasn't beating up parts like an NA build.
Cool....tell snail0.5 how slow his car is then. He literally gets railed by 114 cars.


Btw.....you dumb enough to ignore where i said i like turbos. I just don't think the 550hp turbo build op was wanting was the right way to go for that particular car.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2019 | 02:58 PM
  #222  
panda240ss's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 456
Likes: 14
From: MIAMI
Default

your still dumb enough to come back and keep getting railed here LOL
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2019 | 04:21 PM
  #223  
Tacuache92's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 4
From: Hawthorne CA
Default

Originally Posted by Gav
Sorry all, didnt want to spark a too lively debate. I should have said though i can get all hotside piping and possibly cold side for nothing. So hoping all will cost me is bov, wg, oil feed line, intercooler, injectors plugs and hoses. I realise it could spiral but thinking this would be waaay cheaper than a na 500whp drivable build. Already have turbo for £100. Maybe springs and rods if cost allows but wont be pushing high numbers anyway as would never get power down.
Sometimes its just for acheivement as well as never done turbo install. Will self tune with efilive i already have.
Unless someone could say otherwise.
Regards
Gav
I don't think you sparked anything at all!!
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2019 | 04:28 PM
  #224  
panda240ss's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 456
Likes: 14
From: MIAMI
Default

Originally Posted by Tacuache92
I don't think you sparked anything at all!!
this past 2 weeks hottest thread hahaha
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2019 | 10:04 AM
  #225  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by panda240ss
your still dumb enough to come back and keep getting railed here LOL

Ive been the one doing the railing. Most all of you have just veered off course about a 5.3/4.8 (which op doesn't have)and building turbo systems in 2 hrs. You completely overlooked op goals of acceleration.....which there was none. And from his reply he's not even interested in going that fast.

You don't win arguments doing dumb **** like that.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2019 | 01:10 PM
  #226  
JoeNova's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 109
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You have 2hrs to get it done. Pulled in shop to backed put and tuned ready to race.
Even if it takes me the whole day, how long is your slow junk going to sit in the machine shop being finished by someone else just to be slower than my 6 hour project.
:j est::jes t:

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I'm not gonna have $3500 in my engine. No reason to spend 3k on heads to me. I certainly ain't gonna .
I think its funny how you expect to make more power than Darth did by half-assing his setup.
The owner of the dyno you use must really like you to be giving you the correction factor that he has.
When you've started trapping 150s on a $2500 N/A setup, something you say MIGHT be relevant here.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2019 | 02:46 PM
  #227  
MY_2K_Z's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 43
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Ive been the one doing the railing. Most all of you have just veered off course about a 5.3/4.8 (which op doesn't have)and building turbo systems in 2 hrs. You completely overlooked op goals of acceleration.....which there was none. And from his reply he's not even interested in going that fast.

You don't win arguments doing dumb **** like that.
How much money willing to put on the line against a 2hr built turbo kit (recorded) that will dyno well over 550? I have no need to build another kit right now but at this point I will go build another one for the right money.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2019 | 04:22 PM
  #228  
cdk4219's Avatar
TECH Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 426
Likes: 45
From: ohio
Default

There definately seems to be a buffoon in every forum. The car forum that has an idiot that likes to argue about politics, the Rx7 forum that thought it was absolutely stupid to ls1 a second and third generation RX7, because more power could be made reliably with a rotary engine. The Lincoln forum thought blasphemy when I put the ls1 in the mark viiLSC, and argued that the 302 was better. The Mercedes forums hated my lq4 R129 sl600 because I ripped out the POS v12 and dropped a van engine and trans in.

Now there is an inside forum fool who jumps sections to proclaim that it can make more reliable hp at the 550whp level NA than the guys who have done this 15 plus years ago with turbos. I call this silverHo out for the challenge. I need to see this reliable street mannered 550whp ls1. They are still looking for Bigfoot as well.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2019 | 06:25 PM
  #229  
MY_2K_Z's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 43
From: Houston
Default

I have really enjoyed this thread though, it's a good laugh. The fact that he truly believes he's right just blows my mind.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 08:18 AM
  #230  
panda240ss's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 456
Likes: 14
From: MIAMI
Default

Originally Posted by cdk4219
There definately seems to be a buffoon in every forum. The car forum that has an idiot that likes to argue about politics, the Rx7 forum that thought it was absolutely stupid to ls1 a second and third generation RX7, because more power could be made reliably with a rotary engine. The Lincoln forum thought blasphemy when I put the ls1 in the mark viiLSC, and argued that the 302 was better. The Mercedes forums hated my lq4 R129 sl600 because I ripped out the POS v12 and dropped a van engine and trans in.

Now there is an inside forum fool who jumps sections to proclaim that it can make more reliable hp at the 550whp level NA than the guys who have done this 15 plus years ago with turbos. I call this silverHo out for the challenge. I need to see this reliable street mannered 550whp ls1. They are still looking for Bigfoot as well.
shes all talk no walk....at this point im not even sure if shes trolling or not?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 09:18 AM
  #231  
islander033's Avatar
7 Second Club
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 240
Likes: 404
From: Crossfield, AB
Default

Originally Posted by panda240ss
shes all talk no walk....at this point im not even sure if shes trolling or not?
The only thing she has backed up in the last 20 years was low 11s in the 1/4.....took 3 or 4 NA engines though. LOL
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 09:26 AM
  #232  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by MY_2K_Z
I have really enjoyed this thread though, it's a good laugh. The fact that he truly believes he's right just blows my mind.
The correct term is Napoleon complex.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 10:06 AM
  #233  
panda240ss's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 456
Likes: 14
From: MIAMI
Default

ILL laugh if he decides to go boost and changes his mind, lol
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 10:17 AM
  #234  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
Even if it takes me the whole day, how long is your slow junk going to sit in the machine shop being finished by someone else just to be slower than my 6 hour project.
:j est::jes t:



I think its funny how you expect to make more power than Darth did by half-assing his setup.
The owner of the dyno you use must really like you to be giving you the correction factor that he has.
When you've started trapping 150s on a $2500 N/A setup, something you say MIGHT be relevant here.
How am i half assing Darth's set up? Do you even know what my full set up is? Please splain w/o sounding as stupid as you typically do.

So now it's a 6hr project.....lol. what happened to those 2 hrs?
Originally Posted by MY_2K_Z
How much money willing to put on the line against a 2hr built turbo kit (recorded) that will dyno well over 550? I have no need to build another kit right now but at this point I will go build another one for the right money.
All of it.

Full kit built installed tuned and ready for a pass. By 1 man. You have 2hrs....get it done.

Include time you order the parts to. Because that's all part of it.....unless yall in some time warp where that dont matter. I mostly want that time documented for my own lulz tho.


Originally Posted by cdk4219
There definately seems to be a buffoon in every forum. The car forum that has an idiot that likes to argue about politics, the Rx7 forum that thought it was absolutely stupid to ls1 a second and third generation RX7, because more power could be made reliably with a rotary engine. The Lincoln forum thought blasphemy when I put the ls1 in the mark viiLSC, and argued that the 302 was better. The Mercedes forums hated my lq4 R129 sl600 because I ripped out the POS v12 and dropped a van engine and trans in.

Now there is an inside forum fool who jumps sections to proclaim that it can make more reliable hp at the 550whp level NA than the guys who have done this 15 plus years ago with turbos. I call this silverHo out for the challenge. I need to see this reliable street mannered 550whp ls1. They are still looking for Bigfoot as well.
I really don't think the issue ever was na vs turbos. It started about having a different viewpoint to get op his ACCELERATION goals.

Turn to **** from there by mouth breathers being in full defense of their sister wives.


Originally Posted by MY_2K_Z
I have really enjoyed this thread though, it's a good laugh. The fact that he truly believes he's right just blows my mind.
I am right for op goals. Unless he just wants to play with turbos. Either way his goals should be higher.


Originally Posted by panda240ss
shes all talk no walk....at this point im not even sure if shes trolling or not?
Pretty good walk when 2 of the mouth pieces with boost + whatever else can barely beat a bolt on engine. Kinda sad on their part.

W/o a doubt i am right for op's goal of 550whp.
Originally Posted by islander033
The only thing she has backed up in the last 20 years was low 11s in the 1/4.....took 3 or 4 NA engines though. LOL
Only thing you have backed up is being a bitch.

Originally Posted by ddnspider
The correct term is Napoleon complex.
You do seem to have that issue. It's why you block me....you don't want the troof.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 10:32 AM
  #235  
panda240ss's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 456
Likes: 14
From: MIAMI
Default

maybe we should one day all meetup at a event and run it?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 10:33 AM
  #236  
islander033's Avatar
7 Second Club
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 240
Likes: 404
From: Crossfield, AB
Default

Acceleration goals... Hiollary gonna show y'all how to swiss cheese a car?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 11:49 AM
  #237  
Tacuache92's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 4
From: Hawthorne CA
Default

I guess ill ask the magic question. whats the difference between N/A acceleration Vs lets say a twin turbo setup on a 2 step?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 01:12 PM
  #238  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Tacuache92
I guess ill ask the magic question. whats the difference between N/A acceleration Vs lets say a twin turbo setup on a 2 step?
The NA motor doesn't make the torque that the boosted motor does and typically has a narrower powerband......all to say the acceleration is slower.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 02:33 PM
  #239  
Tacuache92's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 4
From: Hawthorne CA
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
The NA motor doesn't make the torque that the boosted motor does and typically has a narrower powerband......all to say the acceleration is slower.
So In reality it doesn’t matter what the op’s acceleration goals are, since a boosted setup will out do it, just like it will out do everything else? Interesting....
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2019 | 03:30 PM
  #240  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by panda240ss
maybe we should one day all meetup at a event and run it?
It seems to happen at us41 about once a year.

Originally Posted by islander033
Acceleration goals... Hiollary gonna show y'all how to swiss cheese a car?
You showed us how to run 19s with 900+ whp.

Originally Posted by Tacuache92
I guess ill ask the magic question. whats the difference between N/A acceleration Vs lets say a twin turbo setup on a 2 step?
How is that a magic question?

Originally Posted by ddnspider
The NA motor doesn't make the torque that the boosted motor does and typically has a narrower powerband......all to say the acceleration is slower.
What was wrong with your boosted h/c junk? It was a complete turd for what it was.

Originally Posted by Tacuache92
So In reality it doesn’t matter what the op’s acceleration goals are, since a boosted setup will out do it, just like it will out do everything else? Interesting....
Acceleration goals always matter.

Op said he's not really interested in running 10s or 9s......but if you tt a 2500lb car with a ls1 in it you're gonna run 9s. And tgat wouldn't even be hard in HIS car na. So there was the reasoning to asking. Now if he boosts it and still only runs 10s like several others in here i would say that's a waste of effort.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.