Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

New BTR CAST INTAKE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2019, 03:44 PM
  #261  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
NEstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 264
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
But, do you have any comparison data vs another intake option?
Exactly.
Old 11-12-2019, 05:32 PM
  #262  
TECH Fanatic
 
jayyyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,346
Received 829 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
But, do you have any comparison data vs another intake option?
No, I do not.
Old 11-12-2019, 05:48 PM
  #263  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jayyyw
I made 1049whp with this intake. SBE 5.3, billet s476, 24.5psi, TR6060, BTR Stage 2 cam. It peaked at 7200-7300, fell off rather quickly but then flatlined to 7500. I can post the dyno graph a little later. On the street, I pulled it to 7800 and it never felt like it dropped off.
So 1049 wheel at over 7k with a BTR stage 2, BTR intake, and a 6 speed.

Here is a 1194 wheel dyno pull on a T4 billet S476 at about the same boost at less than 7K RPM with a smaller cam and a stock gen 3 truck intake through an auto trans.

See why comparison data matters?


Old 11-12-2019, 06:40 PM
  #264  
TECH Fanatic
 
jayyyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,346
Received 829 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Never said it didn't. Just offered what I had.
Old 01-20-2020, 03:12 PM
  #265  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by white01ss
Ordered mine about a month ago and now it's looking like at least another month. I can't wait for this thing!

Car currently has a bad vacuum leak and isn't too happy. I suspect I've got a cracked FAST 92, but haven't taken it off yet to confirm. Honestly, don't really want to know until I get the BTR Equalizer in my hands. All the boost!
Mine came last month, but haven't had time to put it on yet. Turns out my "vacuum leak" was really a bad/old tank of gas causing high A/F ratio. So at least my FAST 92 isn't cracked.

Anybody have more results on this? Engine Masters did an episode on Blower Manifolds S4E46 where they tested different runner lengths that concluded the difference between them wasn't so great under boost.

Previous episode on Intercooler vs Water/Meth injection S4E45 was eye opening that it showed a big difference is cooling between cylinders when using water/meth into LS6 style intakes. Basically the rear cylinders got the most of it and the front ones didn't get much at all. Wonder how a short runner ram intake like the BTR does on cylinder distribution of fluid injection like water/meth or plate nitrous/fuel.
Old 01-24-2020, 05:41 PM
  #266  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Slow94Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Here are some overlays that I said I'd post a few months ago. Lol

Smoothing is as low as it goes. Trying to show as plain/real numbers as possible. Remember the hi ram was also paired with a converter that was tighter. This is as close of a comparison as I can provide.

1000 hp pull on both graphs is the same pull with the BTR intake

The first sheet has a hi ram overlay on the same boost level (both seem to have maxed out the turbo as in both cases more boost made negligible power gains)

The second being the closest peak power made with the hi ram vs btr to show the curve differences. The pull with the hi ram was 22 psi vs 25 with the BTR manifold.



The following users liked this post:
62nalide (01-25-2020)
Old 01-25-2020, 05:31 AM
  #267  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Surely it would make more sense to explain what colour is what ? Because I've no idea what you're showing.
The following users liked this post:
blackdak318 (06-22-2020)
Old 01-25-2020, 06:31 AM
  #268  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
GT Griller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hereford,Lubbock
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Reads like blue is btr and green is hi ram...looks like the hi ram outshines the btr all over the place if I'm reading it right.
Old 01-25-2020, 06:35 AM
  #269  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

That makes no sense, as at the low end you'd expect the HiRam to shine far above the BTR. So on the top graph the green trace looks odd below 5.5k. Unless there is some reason for not operating below 5.5k ?

And TBH...I'd expect the HiRam to shine over the BTR above 5.5k too.

The lower graph may make sense if the lighter coloured trace is the HiRam
Old 01-25-2020, 08:24 AM
  #270  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Slow94Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You sure are hard to please. Both times I've posted clear descriptions you have to question it.

I don't understand what was so difficult about the way it was explained

There is one line on each graph that is the same pull. That's the BTR intake. BLUE

GREEN is the hi ram on the same boost level

LIGHT BLUE is the hi ram on 3psi less boost FOR A CURVE COMPARISON
Old 01-25-2020, 09:04 AM
  #271  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,746 Likes on 1,304 Posts

Default

So the BTR is lousy essentially compared to the hi ram.
Old 01-25-2020, 09:39 AM
  #272  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
So the BTR is lousy essentially compared to the hi ram.

Which does seem expected. It's a pity as a lot of work did go into it

It just seems that it would take an exceptional combination...and very high rpm's for any short runner intake to really shine on an LS.

If anything, the 6-7" or so of the HiRam or maybe ProFlo or whatever the exact number is, is around the sweet spot for a normal high rpm motor, and the 10"+ of the factory types the sweet spot for everything under 7k.
Old 01-28-2020, 04:04 PM
  #273  
TECH Fanatic
 
jayyyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,346
Received 829 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slow94Formula
You sure are hard to please. Both times I've posted clear descriptions you have to question it.

I don't understand what was so difficult about the way it was explained

There is one line on each graph that is the same pull. That's the BTR intake. BLUE

GREEN is the hi ram on the same boost level

LIGHT BLUE is the hi ram on 3psi less boost FOR A CURVE COMPARISON
To be fair, I was confused as well. Thanks for clearing it up. I sold my BTR intake to go to the Hi Ram. Unfortunately the setup is drastically different, so I won't have any comparisons.
Old 02-03-2020, 10:57 PM
  #274  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
ls13ater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Lincolnton nc
Posts: 274
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

If your going to run the btr intake with truck accessories you might want to skip threw my video, you will have to modify the alternator bracket, use a 07 later water pump,




Last edited by ls13ater; 08-09-2020 at 10:09 PM.
Old 06-21-2020, 03:40 AM
  #275  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
C5natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 659
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Here were our results with the BTR Equalizer 3 intake on a n/a application. To be fair, the cam on this car (BTR LS3 Stage 4) peaks at around 6800rpm, so it wasnt the best setup for the E3 intake. However we were curious how it would do against a ported LS3 intake on your average cammed street car.


Our first test on this car with the ported LS3 inatek and 102mm tb,
Old 06-21-2020, 04:58 AM
  #276  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

you'd probably need to go to 8-8500rpm to see good gains
Old 06-21-2020, 05:22 AM
  #277  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
C5natie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 659
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
you'd probably need to go to 8-8500rpm to see good gains
Agreed. Not many street cars spinning that high though. However, it does look killer under the hood.
Old 06-22-2020, 11:46 PM
  #278  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
GT Griller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hereford,Lubbock
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Damn that sucks ***. That ls3 is hard to beat we all know that but to lose that much under 6500rpm is crazy for the amount of hype the btr gets.
Old 06-23-2020, 12:28 AM
  #279  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,743
Received 423 Likes on 307 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT Griller
Damn that sucks ***. That ls3 is hard to beat we all know that but to lose that much under 6500rpm is crazy for the amount of hype the btr gets.
The BTR does exactly as advertised. It was not designed for sub 6k power. You can tell that just by looking at it.
Old 08-09-2020, 04:24 PM
  #280  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Anybody try this crossover kit?

https://nitrousoutlet.com/i-30561161...sover-kit.html


Quick Reply: New BTR CAST INTAKE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.