methanol direct port injection ... worth it ?
does direct port injection worth the money and the time to me ?
I was going to do DP meth with a single nozzle in front of the IAT sensor.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Basically 1gph of meth fuels 6.66 HP. So most decent single alky pumps can supplement about 260HP if using straight meth. What percent of your total power is 260 crank hp about? If you can supplement 50% of your fuel with methanol, it has higher octane and antiknock properties than E85. 20-30% of your total fueling with meth will still give you a very healthy octane and antiknock benefits. But the gains aren’t linear. So going from 50% to say 100% isn’t going to give you twice the benefit. No where near actually. 50% is a great target and could handle all the boost most of us would want to throw at an engine, even without an intercooler.
I've run typical dual nozzle setups before and the direct port just seemed better, more evenly distributed and smoother if you will. That said I ran a triple nozzle way back with nothing but windshield washer fluid like you said with no intercooler and it worked pretty damn well for what it was before the nicer systems came out.
Basically 1gph of meth fuels 6.66 HP. So most decent single alky pumps can supplement about 260HP if using straight meth. What percent of your total power is 260 crank hp about? If you can supplement 50% of your fuel with methanol, it has higher octane and antiknock properties than E85. 20-30% of your total fueling with meth will still give you a very healthy octane and antiknock benefits. But the gains aren’t linear. So going from 50% to say 100% isn’t going to give you twice the benefit. No where near actually. 50% is a great target and could handle all the boost most of us would want to throw at an engine, even without an intercooler.
I've run typical dual nozzle setups before and the direct port just seemed better, more evenly distributed and smoother if you will. That said I ran a triple nozzle way back with nothing but windshield washer fluid like you said with no intercooler and it worked pretty damn well for what it was before the nicer systems came out.
Obviously nothing is lighter and less lag but requires good tuning.
Only meth works in some race cars but most of the meth kits 3 gal tanks aren't enough for extended driving in a street car with the volume needed (with direct port I could empty a 3 gal tank in less than an hour of spirited driving).
Air to air is about the most dummy proof thing out there, no refills, no pumps to turn on or pumps to fail, etc... my big air to air added about 40 lbs to the nose but IAT's hardly ever got high.
Air to water has the best possibility of lowest IAT's but also usually the heaviest, but you can distribute that weight in a better spot. My air to water added about 20lbs to the nose, but I put the tank in the trunk and that 50lbs or so helps traction. With that move I took my lightweight battery (17lbs) off the nose and put a full sized battery in the trunk as well. Both changes helped street traction a good bit. You can have the pump run all the time but I think that is a waste and just heats up the reservoir, so I just hit the pump before making a pull. That said I just went around and ripped on my car, forgot to turn on the IC pump and IAT's still didn't get over 115* which is about what they hit with an air to air anyways. But with ice water and a good pump its possible to get sub ambient temps which is the draw the more complicated and heavier system.
Depends how much money is worth to you, and your time.
Is it better than what you currently have ? Of course it is. Although at only 20psi, unless it's poor fuel or not built with your chosen fuel in mind, methanol isnt needed.
Although IMO it seems difficult to make a nice and neat port injection system
In reality, at pressure, with boost via a nozzle...real world flows are much much lower. I extensively tested my AEM pump with various nozzles and at different duties etc. Real world I deemed it to have only around 1200cc of effective flow regardless of nozzles. ie. 1.2LPM.
Bigger nozzles just seen spray pattern turn to **** but no actual extra flow anyway. Or not enough to justify the poor spray.
In actual use, max pressure ever seen in the line is around 140psi. All these 200psi, 300psi claims etc...I presume are either against a dead head, or with extremely small nozzles.
But at least with a port system, you are helping to ensure a more equal flow to each cylinder.
That still seems to be a test that is unclear as to how good or bad some pre TB injection systems may be. I'd suspect a carb intake car might fair better as those manifolds were intended for wet distributions in the first place. But for other dry intakes....it'd be nice to see some individual cylinder lambda readings under load with some systems and different intakes, and the thermocouple in each runner that RH/Engine Masters did would be welcome to see as an actual test run at the same time, rather than 8 tests run at different times, 1 for each runner.
And even better held under load for maybe 10-15secs to get a proper test for heat soak and to allow the TC to stabilise, as all IAT sensors and most thermocouples are very slow to respond.










