V8 Long Stroke for high Boost
In the boost usually engines with a large thickness of the cylinder walls are preferred, I have seen on average, that around the boost, for example, many use the lsx 427 instead of the lsx 454, I guess it is for the smaller bore and therefore a greater thickness of the walls, and consequently a greater solidity of the block under high boost.
So by logic, building an engine for high boost, wouldn't it be convenient to just increase the stroke, using dedicated connecting rods and crankshaft, instead of increasing the bores? It would increase the displacement, and maintain a good block strength under high boost .............. why then around, the majority increase the bore?
Mike Moran built a 5" bore space big bore BBC with a short stroke for his TT combo, makes stupid power.
People don't usually boost the LS 454 because the gasket between the cylinder bores is really, really thin.
Boosted 440", 427" and 388" are way more common mostly because turbo engines like to rev, big stroke means big piston speed means big frictional losses and limited rpm.
Hell there are guys out there like Capizzi making 1,300-1,400hp on sbe 5.3's at 8,500+ rpm.
With blocks that have big bore spacing and tall decks, it is less of an issue than with an LS.
Running less displacement and more boost is always an option. V8 guys are a decade behind import guys in that ideology.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
- Over Square is when the cylinder bore is wider than the stroke. (High revving, lower torque production)
- Under Square is wen the cylinder bore is narrower than the stroke. (Low revving, higher torque production)
Great example is the 5.3 LS, bore is 3.780 inches and stroke is 3.622 inches so an over square design that incorporates a thick cylinder wall.
Now if we toss a stroker crank shaft in with a 4.00" stroke we get 363ci and an under square design which as we all know with strokers makes more torque but won't have the rpm of the original 5.3 crank.













