Twins vs. single turbo....
02-21-2005, 07:30 PM
#21
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bensenville, IL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think any turbo setup ,single or twin, can be efficient and make good power, if properly designed. I went single for the cost factor. And i also like the look of one big turbo under the hood. (not saying mine is huge or anything)
02-21-2005, 08:07 PM
#22
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboTPI
I think any turbo setup ,single or twin, can be efficient and make good power, if properly designed. I went single for the cost factor. And i also like the look of one big turbo under the hood. (not saying mine is huge or anything)
02-21-2005, 08:38 PM
#24
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cablebandit
i didnt pick twins....i picked Incon because of the durability of the kits out at the time.
02-21-2005, 08:45 PM
#25
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HellRaiser
So far from everything I read it seems that icon was the best kit made. They make great power and they seem to last for a long time.
02-22-2005, 07:11 AM
#29
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OH
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cablebandit
i think 4500-5500
Yep, a few of us early buyers got the stage I for 4400! They did go up to 5500 after the intro - and most of the people who were screwed paid that figure
If I ever sell my kit it'd go for 6k.
