Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

1020rwhp 860rwtq @ 20psi on my twin turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2005, 05:25 AM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

awsome results.
do you have any pics of your setup and a dyno sheet?

congrats again!
Old 04-26-2005, 07:14 AM
  #22  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Awsome numbers, Ford or not 1000+rwhp is too cool.
Old 04-26-2005, 07:14 AM
  #23  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are you trying to do 6th gear burnouts
Old 04-26-2005, 07:21 AM
  #24  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Tiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: HOUSTON-TX
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 04-26-2005, 07:54 AM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
quicksilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Incredible numbers for Ford or Chevy.
Old 04-26-2005, 08:07 AM
  #26  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Tydriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indy, IN
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice #'s.. Not a huge fan of that body style (I miss the 90-93 Mustang body-style) but nobody can argue with 1000+ hp.
Old 04-26-2005, 08:18 AM
  #27  
Teching In
 
Dustin Mustangs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Spartan Country!
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice indeed...

If you don't mind, I have a couple of Q's. First, what type of tranny. Second, when do you see boost and when does it hit full boost. Same question but on INTMD8's 383 before and after the BB'ing turbos if you happen to know.

I'm just curious to see how much 36ci and/or BB'ings have an effect on spool and this seems like a pretty fair comparison for both. Not to mention I've always had a thing for the turbos you're running and it seems like not to many others run them.

BTW, my screen name is a joke (certainly when your car is around!!) so don't take it the wrong way.
Old 04-26-2005, 08:56 AM
  #28  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Jeebus!!!

Nice numbers!

1) Are you still A2A fmic?

2) How do the oil feeds work compared to your old YSi setup?

3) As a followup to 2, how high do the turbos need to be mounted?
1)yes

2)same with a y fitting

3)higher than the highest level of oil in the pan
Old 04-26-2005, 08:59 AM
  #29  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dustin Mustangs
Very nice indeed...

If you don't mind, I have a couple of Q's. First, what type of tranny. Second, when do you see boost and when does it hit full boost. Same question but on INTMD8's 383 before and after the BB'ing turbos if you happen to know.

I'm just curious to see how much 36ci and/or BB'ings have an effect on spool and this seems like a pretty fair comparison for both. Not to mention I've always had a thing for the turbos you're running and it seems like not to many others run them.

BTW, my screen name is a joke (certainly when your car is around!!) so don't take it the wrong way.

posting under jims name:the tranny is amodular mustangs prepped tremec tko 600 to handle 900 plus ft/lbs.Peak boost was around 5000rpm.Jims is a 357c.i.and the his car is still apart.Thanks for the props
Old 04-26-2005, 09:17 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
 
slyws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: "Tr"Asheville
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome numbers man!!! I used to own a 94GT with a 357 in it. Just curious, how much $ do you have into the car, including engine, rearend, tranny etc...

-Sly
Old 04-26-2005, 09:43 AM
  #31  
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
awsome results.
do you have any pics of your setup and a dyno sheet?

congrats again!
Search on turbomustangs.com. There are pics on there.
Old 04-26-2005, 09:58 AM
  #32  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well a big part of the increase over Jim is going from on-center housings to tang housings. On top of that he had the smaller A/R's on the on-centers which will flow alot less. Good #'s btw...

Jose
Old 04-26-2005, 09:59 AM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
abadss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home of #3, NC
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice car, great #'s!
Old 04-26-2005, 11:21 AM
  #34  
I ruin the end of films...
iTrader: (2)
 
mongse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Taking back some video tapes
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you think of the TKO? I'm looking at putting one in another car and was looking for input from people who are running them in some serious setups (it'll be behind a twin turbo SB).
Old 04-26-2005, 11:41 AM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
hc_performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: memphis
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JZ 97 SS 1500
Well a big part of the increase over Jim is going from on-center housings to tang housings. On top of that he had the smaller A/R's on the on-centers which will flow alot less. Good #'s btw...

Jose
what is the difference between on-center housings and tang housings? Sorry but I am a noob to turbos.
Old 04-26-2005, 12:05 PM
  #36  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I believe Garrett has said around 15% drop of efficiency. I will check into it...I know it was a nice drop...lol. So its even more impressive Jim's car was making those #'s. His car was running 150mph and pulling 3800lbs. Thats moving....
Old 04-26-2005, 09:24 PM
  #37  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (119)
 
PRAY HRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CISSNA PARK, IL
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

damn.........the two of you have definately got your acts together! way to go and can't wait to see Jim's new #'s too.

Dave
Old 04-27-2005, 08:08 AM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
A DEE O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Holy ****, Dan................. Take me for a ride next time I come by the shop.................. Awesome..............
Old 04-27-2005, 09:29 AM
  #39  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Got Me SOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 6,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

for the hell of it, did you dyno on pump gas?
Old 04-27-2005, 09:42 AM
  #40  
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Race Car Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danimal95
the car is a 347 r blocked ford in a 95 mustang cobra,small hydraulic roller cam,RGR ported z304 motorsport heads,super victor carbed intake converted to efi,FAST engine management.
Good grief, is this Fordtech.com? The next thing we'll see is Bush kissing Keary! LOL


Quick Reply: 1020rwhp 860rwtq @ 20psi on my twin turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.