Iron or aluminium?
Anyway, recently I was telling a friend about my plans and he thinks its a bad idea to use an aluminium block( he has an 87 GN and a 97 single turbo 383 z28) he said that it may nt last along time over 600rwhp. so I told him about :worship: Steve harlan and how he was putting down close to 600rwhp on the stock motor and plans to make more after his rebuild. My friend thinks it wont last forever. he advised me to get a 6.0L truck block, the thing is, I saw Godspeeds car, and it didnt seem all that fast I dont know if it was his heads and cam combo, or his heavy motor.
So anyway, I would like to know if the ls6 block could handle 700-800rwhp,( built of course) or would I be better off getting the iron block, if so, do I use teh ls6 heads, or the 6.0L heads?
I'm told when you make in excess of 600 or 700 RWHP, it gets harder to keep the Aluminum block stable. Keeping the heads down with a lot of boost gets problematic, too.
<small>[ June 03, 2002, 11:34 AM: Message edited by: Black LS1 T/A ]</small>
I think the aluminum heads are the biggest issue with high boost apps. The current clamping techniques seem to be able to hold them down but, the heads themselves distort. The aluminum blocks also seem to be decent(for how long is the ?) in high power apps. but, the iron block should add some insurance.
Once Harlan gets his car running we may see the first split LS1 aluminum block. Sorry Harlan <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
John
The C5R block is a nice piece and comes with billet main caps. Pretty pricey, but if price is no object well worth the investment.
Paul
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As mentioned above, its not that the heads wont stay on, its more that they bow up in the middle. Iron heads might stop this, good idea but it will probably be awhile before anyone trys it (we're all too weight consious.)
Iron block will be more resistant to detonation, but I believe the bottom end will be more stable as well. Sure, alum is lighter, but it takes twice as much to do the job. Aluminium's expansion rate is nearly twice what cast iron's is. Alum has better heat disspertion, but that isn't really the name of the game with performance motors. Heat = horsepower. If you notice most LS1s run better w/o a 160 degree 'stat, but some need it to control detonation.
Alum heads let you run more timing and compression, but thats because there's less mass and its dissipating the heat more. I'd rather have a ridgid block that is going to hold the boost and not deform.
+++ to alum is it's lighter, and the often overlooked ease of repair. Aluminium is a lot easier to weld and patch than cast iron. This means you can get a lot more radical in the head porting, cause if you hit water you can just weld over it and keep on porting vs having to get new castings.
I'm also weary about the differences in rates of expansion between the cast iron cylinder sleeves and the alum block in the LS1/LS6 blocks under extreme heat and/or detonation. Of course I'm the type that worries a lot.
Aluminium is over-rated, ceramics are where its at. But I'm rambling now so I'll shut up....
J.
<small>[ June 04, 2002, 11:18 AM: Message edited by: Crazyquik ]</small>


