Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Someone explain this

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2006, 06:34 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Vols Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Landrum,SC
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Someone explain this

Before I got my SS I had a 96 GT Conv. Both cars charged with V-9 Vortech systems. The SS is aftercooled the GT was not. Here is the thing why could I get away with 10psi on the stock Stang internals with nothing more than a Hypertech tune an all the LS1 will stand is 6.5-7psi with a custom dyno tune. Neither car is/was daliy driven. Im just curious my tuner kept my tune safe an stongly urged me not to go down on the pulley size an I read alot on this board an other sites not to go more than 7psi on stock bottom ends. Is this just the way it is or was I pushing my luck in the Stang with a ticking time bomb? Im not complaing though the GT mode 262rwhp an the almighty LS1 made 475
Thanks guys
Old 07-19-2006, 06:38 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
JD_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Vols Fan
Before I got my SS I had a 96 GT Conv. Both cars charged with V-9 Vortech systems. The SS is aftercooled the GT was not. Here is the thing why could I get away with 10psi on the stock Stang internals with nothing more than a Hypertech tune an all the LS1 will stand is 6.5-7psi with a custom dyno tune. Neither car is/was daliy driven. Im just curious my tuner kept my tune safe an stongly urged me not to go down on the pulley size an I read alot on this board an other sites not to go more than 7psi on stock bottom ends. Is this just the way it is or was I pushing my luck in the Stang with a ticking time bomb? Im not complaing though the GT mode 262rwhp an the almighty LS1 made 475
Thanks guys
What is the compression on your mustang. I've seen guys run 8.5 lbs with an upgraded fuel system and tune, on the stock bottom.
Old 07-19-2006, 06:40 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
98turbls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Oklahoma
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm pretty sure that the compression was MUCH lower on the stang...That makes a huge difference as far as how much boost you can run...
Old 07-19-2006, 06:53 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Jesse_Boyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

as mentioned, static compression makes a big difference. However, there's a ton more to it. The additional displacement and flow of the LS1 heads verses the stock GT make a big difference. Cam stats as well...

some of that should explain the HP difference.

As far as the difference in boost you ran, that depends on the strength of internals and compression ratio
Old 07-19-2006, 07:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Vols Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Landrum,SC
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As I mentioned before it was stock stang internals an what ever the compression is on those cars. What is the stock compression on a 98 LS1? The stang did have 30lb/hr injectors an T-rex feul pump.
Old 07-19-2006, 09:40 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
novi2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

on the stang you more than likely had 9:1 compression the ls1 is what 10:1?
Old 07-19-2006, 10:53 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (23)
 
Bird-Of-Prey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Think of it more in terms of horse power or flow (CFM). A stock shortblock can only take so much before having to go forged. Boost is not nessesarely (spelling?) a good thing. It is merely a measurement of restriction. If you take an engine such as the LS1 which has superior flow cababilities vs. the 4.6 GT you won't need near as much boost to make the same HP. Assuming both motors could handle the same RWHP level before they let go, An LS1 may only take 8lb's boost to reach 550rwhp where as a GT may require 12-15lb's for the same rwhp level.
Old 07-28-2006, 03:58 AM
  #8  
Teching In
 
PewterWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wait are you saying that you only got 262rwhp running a v-9 vortech at 10psi on your gt? Or is that after you took off the supercharger? j/w
Old 07-28-2006, 06:54 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

work out the horsepower per cubic inch, see which is better.

boost is just a measure of intake pressure, nothing more.
Old 07-28-2006, 07:35 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
Firechikn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I know a car that ran 12psi on a stock ls1. Boost #'s are for ricers. Imagine the amount of air flow if you put 10psi on a straw, compaired to 10psi on a 2.5" pipe. CFM is the only true measurement that counts.
Old 07-28-2006, 08:35 AM
  #11  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Vols Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Landrum,SC
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes 262rwhp on the GT with the charger an a dyno tune IT SUCKED!!!!
Old 07-28-2006, 09:22 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Camaro_Zach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
work out the horsepower per cubic inch, see which is better.

boost is just a measure of intake pressure, nothing more.
thank you. haha, its a common misconception amongst people.
Old 07-28-2006, 01:10 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
 
ChevyNo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran 12psi on my stock block, but with alky injection. Pump seized and boom it went.

- Dug
Old 07-28-2006, 02:06 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Vols Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Landrum,SC
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i dont have alky injection but I do have a aftercooler.
Old 07-28-2006, 03:28 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

96-98 mustang heads SUCK.

I've been in 12# vortech cars, that make less than 300 rwhp.

Plus a hypertech tune on a blown mustang is asking for trouble...

Ryan
Old 07-28-2006, 03:37 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Vols Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Landrum,SC
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow
96-98 mustang heads SUCK.

I've been in 12# vortech cars, that make less than 300 rwhp.

Plus a hypertech tune on a blown mustang is asking for trouble...

Ryan
My thoughts exactly thats why I have an LS1 now.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.